Whenever a politician like Rahm Emmanual comes along, a real slimy, a-moral "Democrat", fresh out of the Whitehouse where he pushed Obama to the right, stamped with the seal of approval of Obama takes over the reigns of a city like Chicago, the first thing he wants to do is cut 144 million dollars. Chicago hasn't had a teachers strike in TWENTY-FIVE YEARS, meaning the gov and the union have been working in unison up until today.
Which one of these two parties has changed? Richard Daley was the Mayor of Chicago since 1989 and through countless rounds of collective bargaining has maintained good relations with the teachers union. Rahm Emmanual, perhaps gearing up for a bigger run on a bigger stage, immediately picks a fight with the teachers union and asks them to pay for a fiscal crisis they did NOT create.
Friends, we must consider what each party wants in order for us to properly determine who is the guilty party in this narrative. Cicero asked "Cui Bono", which means, "Who Benifets", and that is where you find guilt and innocence.
If the Chicago Public School teachers want better teaching conditions, air conditioning, smaller class sizes, more control over their own curriculum, and good pensions so new teachers can be hired, who benefits? The teachers, and most importantly, THE STUDENTS.
If CPS teachers take a cut without gaining anything, which is what the city wants, who benifits? The fiscal picture of Chicago remains unchanged, and its the STUDENTS who take the cut. Kids don't have a union. If you cut 50k out of a schools budget they lose pens and pencils. If you cut 50k out of a schools pay pool they lose teachers and motivation.
Teachers should be paid to a point where they are not worried about pay, and focused on the very sensitive task at hand. Stand with the teachers and not the politicians. They raise your kids and want whats best for them, because that is ultimately whats best for the teachers.