Saw a lot of ignorant posts in here so I had to chime in. This strike is NOT about money. Compensation is the least of the issues and they were already close on that issue. The main problem is teacher benefits and job security related to those standardized tests. Think about it, if you've already had benefits in place, is it fair to diminish them? Sure, you may be covered, but what about your family? Also, standardized test should not be used as a tool for evaluating students. I've seen students who did well end up not amounting to shyt,can't conversely, those who did poor and went on to successful careers with multiple degrees. Is a teacher a failure because their student bombs on the SAT? Is the teacher remarkable or just lucky if they happen to have a student who scores a perfect 36 on the ACT? One of the main reasons I didn't pursue a teaching career other than my la k of patience is the beurocracy bullshyt, and those bad ass kids. We never had proper resources in HS...we couldn't even take our textbooks home. I've seen disruptive students damn near assault teachers and the teachers are powerless. Yes, teachers make a decent salary, but at what cost?
Also, I am a product of CPS, and our days weren't that short. 9am-3pm most of the time in grammar school...one year I recall staying as late as 4:30pm on certain days. In HS, it was 8am to about 2:30. It really depended on your schedule, because you may stay past 3, but by senior year, you may leave before 2pm.
Do teachers have it as bad as some other employees? Not really, but that shouldn't factor into what THEY are dealing with. I definitely support the teachers in all this.