It sure was but they fumbled the bag
Rockstar is light years beyond these other studios
- Thread starter The Devil's Advocate
- Start date
It sure was but they fumbled the bag
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
For a while they were to go to open worl/sandbox game but now that every AAA game is now open world they’ve effectively caught up to them. They haven’t put much distance between them and the competition since San Andreas outside of making really good looking games. They haven’t evolved their gameplay at all.
RDR2 uses the same exact dead eye system as teh first game. They didn’t even think of expanding upon it. Same quest structure, same story arcs.
The Devil's Advocate
Call me Dad
Turn off the HUD and all the auto aiming and try it
I always turn off the hud and mini map. I don't fast travel either. none of that really forces you to use the survival mechanics in RDR2 thoughTurn off the HUD and all the auto aiming and try it
Rockstar mostly has the open world sandbox game down. You may not like anything else, but they have refined that aspect.
The programmer in me really cosigns this 100x. What they did with rdr2 is a technical masterpiece.
Fani Willis fan
Veteran
with RDR2 i think they sacrificed too much meat and potatoes in terms of gameplay in order to really push the performance factor, visually and tech wise.
Its the same gripe i have with Botw, (although the graphics are lackluster compared to RDR2’s leap)
Imagine catching feelings cause people speaking the truth about how shytty gaming studios are compared to 1 that makes quality shyt
Dudes really in here aggy like bytches
Imagine catching feelings, because Red Dead came and went, got over shadowed Last of US 2 and Ghost of Tsushima
so now you have to make a thread about a rock star, a company nobody is talking about because they make the same again for two decades, just because a popular game looked like shyt on a 7 year old consoles
yall fan boys are ridiculous, I though Cyberpunk was gonna be over hyped trash, you can see my post in this forum, Witcher 3 was overrated
all the problems with the physics in this game were in Witcher 3, that game had TERRIBLE PHYSICS, yet nobody cared, yet want to act brand new with this game
because dumb ass rock star fans thinks this was suppose to some kind GTA type of game when anybody with half a brain new this is basically a first person witcher 3 in a cyberpunk setting
Deep_Black_Conscious
Superstar
this thread is horrible
all these piff GOATier games and people too jaded and snobbish to care
too busy being stans and fanboys
the level of quality for AAA games has been unprecedented and yet here we are
all these piff GOATier games and people too jaded and snobbish to care
too busy being stans and fanboys
the level of quality for AAA games has been unprecedented and yet here we are
Dushane Hill
Superstar
Part of me wishes Rockstar were the ones who picked up Cyberpunk. For all its flaws driving around the city at night is pretty fukking incredible.
Gizmo_Duck
blathering blatherskite!
Cyberpunk is a table top role playing game, rockstar doesn’t make role playing games.
Dushane Hill
Superstar
Yeah I get it, but I think it could have been interesting if rockstar picked it up and turned it into more of a third person action adventure like GTA or RDR but with some of the RPG elements. Always thought it would be interesting to see Rockstar bring out a new IP in a futuristic setting.
MillionMills
Superstar
Rockstar by far is the best at open world games. People in this thread trying to argue against it are just on some stan shyt. The only developer coming close is Bethesda
This.Turn off the HUD and all the auto aiming and try it
I've spend most of my time on the game like that. Not for everyone.
But, fukking amazing to me.