It's not the same thing my boy. I shyt on Nintendo as much as the next man. But there's clear reasons why this is different.
Nah if you can play Zelda because it's designed around 30fps. Then you can play this because it's designed around 30fps at a base minimum.
If you can't deal with 30fps, then you won't be playing Zelda which I'm almost sure will dip under 30fps even.
If you can't deal with 30fps in 1st person games only then just wait for the patch or play it on PC.
If the game on console didn't have a 60fps mode I can understand people being upset, if there was no other option to play it at 60fps or even play the game for under 70 bucks I could understand.
But people saying they should have just delayed the game tells me that these dudes really only care about perception and not games. And that's on all sides.
Being disappointed that 60fps wasn't ready for launch on Console is fine. But people talking all this other stuff tells me that they just want another feather in their cap to cape about there system of choice.
This is essentially like being upset about parts of your dishes not coming out all at once after being given the option to wait for it all...
It's still coming just not as quick as some of the rest.
People say they ok with a delay(or want fresh food) and to take your time, but then complain about how it all should have been ready.
its just 60fps is what" the people" want nowadays... Outside of fighters, and fps I don't care at all.
