Popular WHITE youtuber states that BLACK christians = uncle toms

[Blackout]

Bruh.

You stole religious concepts, dropped the name, and claim you're "unique" now.

fukk out my face man.

I didn't steal anything. The idea of a higher power isn't strictly for the religious. It was there before religion and it will be there after religion.

I never claimed to be unique because there are other nonreligious theists out there.

Of course you'd want me out of your face because I'm right and your wrong.

 

[Ain't That Something]

Sure.
that this god EXISTS (which is a characteristic) and intervenes or does not intervene with the world. He flip flops since he isn't sure, but he's certain that his deity does have a stance on intervention.

God exist is not a characteristics it's a hypothesis he came by with the world and his existence as the only evidence He never said anything bout God inteference with the world you putting words in his mouth.

TO EVEN HAVE A STANCE...is dogmatic.

But he doesn't have a stance his ultimate stance would be that he don't know so where is the dogma in that

Its a very nuanced argument but it deals with the fact that having an unsubstantiated opinion, one way or the other, is ultimately dogmatic.



Nope. Not yet.

Again he doesn't have an opinion he goes by the universal rule for there to be creation there must be a creator

He doesn't have to. He claimed that his god EXISTS AND intervenes. which isn't a logical statement beacuse you can't take that for a fact.

You can't prove such a claim.

It sounds like I'm being anal, but the premise that everything needs a creator is not universally true.

He is dogmatic because he claims this higher power exists (and admits to lacking evidence) and that this higher power interactions with the universe (with no evidence).

Name me one thing that was created that did not have a creator I'm waiting

 

[Crakface]

"Is"...is not "ought"

Religious belief is not the result of tradition but rather ignorance.

The very things that modern africans in vast swaths of the continue attribute to religion are better explained by formal educations in biology, physics, and other general sciences westerners take for granted.

There ARE no (confirmed) existences outside of organic life.

Doesn't mean you can't enjoy this life any more, but that doesn't give you the credibility to start making shyt up to pass the time.

You SHOULD (hopefully if your education and appreciation of honesty is worth a damn) know better.

I think they'll do both and be ok, soon as you cacs stop trying to tell other people how to think. As a people your shrinking and its obviously because you posture as spiritual while living as devil worshippers.

 

[Blackout]

There goes Napoleon saying I claimed something. I already showed him that I never made a claim but he pretends that I still did.

He is as delusional as any religious nut.

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

A non-black calling blacks Uncle Toms?

Call a spade a spade

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I didn't steal anything. The idea of a higher power isn't strictly for the religious. It was there before religion and it will be there after religion.

I never claimed to be unique because there are other nonreligious theists out there.

Of course you'd want me out of your face because I'm right and your wrong.

Oh really now?

So you're going to ignore the fact that you're:

1. stealing religious concepts

2. rebranding religious concepts

3. pretending that NO ONE picked up that you jacked the most vague concepts out there

4. attributing CHARACTERISTICS and ABILITIES to this deity

5. equating your vague lust for their to be something (dogma) as there actually BEING something there...

6. A non-religious theist IS A DEIST. A deist is basically a SUPER broad p*ssy ass theist who is scared to be associated with religions because of the negative stigma so they prance around like they're "more reasonable" and "open minded" by attaching themselves to vague ideas with no backing or rationale yet act like they "don''t claim anything"

Get the entire fukk out of here with that bullshyt.

If you keep claiming it, i'll keep debunking it.

I'm not changing my view on your sorry ass-wannabe-unique, self-centered watered down religion.

You can keep playing that game with other people, but I'm WAY too versed in this shyt.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

There goes Napoleon saying I claimed something. I already showed him that I never made a claim but he pretends that I still did.

He is as delusional as any religious nut.

1. you claimed theres a god

2. you claimed this god intervenes with the universe.



Doesn't get simpler than that.

I think they'll do both and be ok, soon as you cacs stop trying to tell other people how to think. As a people your shrinking and its obviously because you posture as spiritual while living as devil worshippers.

"you cacs?"

Breh...what do you think I am?

 

[Arishok]

So what if you both believe and do not believe in God/Gods

 

[GoPro]

These cacs just trying to pull black people down into their depraved mindstate. Sorry cacs, we'll never be like you. We were a spirtual people before you and we'll continue to be a spiritual people after you. Christianity is not suitable for the termperment of white people which is why they're having such a hard time practicing it. They have to always find some moral reason why the sick shyt they do is justified instead of just admitting that they're mentally warped.

You see how prevalent they are in committing devious acts. Pedophilia, beastiality, sexual sadism. Cacs is the devil's apprentices.

 

[Blackout]

Oh really now?

So you're going to ignore the fact that you're:

1. stealing religious concepts

2. rebranding religious concepts

3. pretending that NO ONE picked up that you jacked the most vague concepts out there

4. attributing CHARACTERISTICS and ABILITIES to this deity

5. equating your vague lust for their to be something (dogma) as there actually BEING something there...

6. A non-religious theist IS A DEIST. A deist is basically a SUPER broad p*ssy ass theist who is scared to be associated with religions because of the negative stigma so they prance around like they're "more reasonable" and "open minded" by attaching themselves to vague ideas with no backing or rationale yet act like they "don''t claim anything"

Get the entire fukk out of here with that bullshyt.

If you keep claiming it, i'll keep debunking it.

I'm not changing my view on your sorry ass-wannabe-unique, self-centered watered down religion.

You can keep playing that game with other people, but I'm WAY too versed in this shyt.

My only belief is that a higher owner exists and that it may intervene in this universe. That's about it.

I never said it was more valid than any other possibility out there and I def did nit say that it was anything close to being a fact.

So no I'm not a deist and I'm not stealing anything because I doubt any religion looked to our ability to create like I have to based my belief on.

 

[Kitsune]

It has been secured

Thankyou

 

[Blackout]

1. you claimed theres a god

2. you claimed this god intervenes with the universe.



Doesn't get simpler than that.



"you cacs?"

Breh...what do you think I am?

A claim is to assert something as fact. I did no such thing.

Its good to know the meanings to the words you use.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

God exist is not a characteristics it's a hypothesis

...that he believes and has adopted.

The time to believe something is when you have evidence, which he admitted a few pages ago that he does NOT have.

he came by with the world and his existence as the only evidence

He claimed he didn't have evidence so you dont get to make his argument FOR him.

He never said anything bout God inteference with the world you putting words in his mouth.

Oh really...

Read this:

http://www.thecoli.com/goto/post?id=5395911#post-5395911

http://www.thecoli.com/threads/popu...istians-uncle-toms.146073/page-8#post-5396409

Done deal

But he doesn't have a stance his ultimate stance would be that he don't know so where is the dogma in that

His stance isn't that "he doesn't know"

His stance is that HE BELIEVES THIS GOD EXISTS AND does XYZ.

Again he doesn't have an opinion he goes by the universal rule for there to be creation there must be a creator

Thats not a universal rule.

Name me one thing that was created that did not have a creator I'm waiting

You can't prove a negative.

It seems like it'd be a logical impossibility...but you can't TECHNICALLY prove that

...oh...and quantum physics

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

A claim is to assert something as fact. I did no such thing.

Its good to know the meanings to the words you use.

You believe a god exists and it does XYZ things.

Too bad.

 

[Blackout]

You believe a god exists and it does XYZ things.

Too bad.

Yea I believe that but I still acknowledge that we don't know in the end.

None is enough to label me as dogmatic or religious so too bad.