Ive heard Chris and some of his actors describe his process and its not how you described it at all
Oppenheimer (Directed by Christopher nolan)
- Thread starter Max.
- Start date
null
...
I guess soi see ... i must be wrong then ... about his eye movies
This shyt 3 hours long?
Watched the first 45 minutes and gave up
I got a short ass attention span
Gonna give it another go soon
I thought I saw it during the screening and it was confirmed reading up on the movie after, but there's a quick shot of a black glove pushing her head in the water. There's a conspiracy theory that she was actually killed.
We’re they supposed to re-write his life and exploits to make it an original story?!
Bugzbunny129
All Star
We’re they supposed to re-write his life and exploits to make it an original story?!
Look at these stans all mad. Its bigger than retelling what happened. Besides the public talks, everything else is the same. Dialogue. Shots. Reactions. Transitions. Story beats.
Nolan did NOT write this movie. Is my point.
The Original ‘Oppenheimer’: How the BBC Brought the Father of the Atom Bomb to Life Long Before Christopher Nolan (EXCLUSIVE)
Decades before Christopher Nolan's movie, a BBC exec went to America to make a $1.5 million TV show about J. Robert Oppenheimer.
variety.com
“Goodchild who used his research to write a book on Oppenheimer that published alongside the series in 1980 — had some interaction with Kai Bird, co-author of the 2005 Oppenheimer biography “American Prometheus” that Nolan’s film is based on. However, neither he nor Caleb were contacted by the “Tenet” director or Universal Studios as the new film came together. In fact, the pair are full of questions about how the movie turned out, and how it compares to the series. “I wonder what attracted [Nolan] to Oppenheimer,” Caleb says.”
* their movie obv did
The book the movie is “based on” has nothing to do with the original series. They met briefly.
And yes. Straight PRIVATE conversations are in both. Straight SHOT FOR SHOT scene transitions. Oppenheimer invites his future wife out and invites her husband too. Same response. Cut tot riding horses. Same way. All the private moments are exact.
Of course it was gonna have the senate hearings and all that and be based on truth. But a scene for scene remake? The same exact private lines of “made up” dialog? Do you think this mans entire lifes dialogue is written down. The OG writers made a lot of that shyt up based on info. Nolan just relaid it down as is and cut around it.
Why dont yall rewatch the bbc film for yaselves. They didnt remake “fat man and little boy” they remade the bbc series. Why are those films comoletely diff but these 2 are the exact same movies. EXACT.
If any other big director did this they would be shyt on. Guy took an entire script and just replaced actors and cut out exposition wnd placed his name on it. The only scene i didnt see in this flick were the fukk scenes (and they are def cribbed as well, from both the series and oppenheimers infamous interview himself) and the dissapointed winstein scene used in beginning and end.
What a writer…
I dont expect brand new information. But i expected something new brought to the table somewhat. Obviously there is a degree of artistic lisence taken wiyh any movie. Ive NEVER seen a director get writing credit for cribbing an entire film before and be hailed as some revolutionary filmmaker.
And i dont even know why first guy bringing up the black and white. Thats the one artistic thing he brought to the entire picture. Atleast he did that.
Even the revelation of strauss being behind it all (complete with wife flipping out over it) and all his behind the scenes talks are EXACTLY the same. Beat for beat, same movie. Close ups of the wifes face as oppenheimer tells his story at the clearance hearing. Her being mad after. Annoying lawyer. You telling me they couldnt change it up a little? That it “all happened tbis way”. Get real.
Yall bytch about remakes all day yet sucking this mans dikk when he just straight shot for shot remade a film and didnt even advertise the fact or does anyone seem to know.
What i expected is all his public appearance stuff to be the same. Instead EVERYTHING was. The shots. How they transition. What they transition to. Its more than dialogue.
This film is a paint by numbers copy. Fact. In any other profession, this is plagiarism. He dint even know how to properly give credit to source material.
Last edited:
Look at these stans all mad. Its bigger than retelling what happened. Besides the public talks, everything else is the same. Dialogue. Shots. Reactions. Transitions. Story beats.
Nolan did NOT write this movie. Is my point.
The Original ‘Oppenheimer’: How the BBC Brought the Father of the Atom Bomb to Life Long Before Christopher Nolan (EXCLUSIVE)
Decades before Christopher Nolan's movie, a BBC exec went to America to make a $1.5 million TV show about J. Robert Oppenheimer.variety.com
“Goodchild who used his research to write a book on Oppenheimer that published alongside the series in 1980 — had some interaction with Kai Bird, co-author of the 2005 Oppenheimer biography “American Prometheus” that Nolan’s film is based on. However, neither he nor Caleb were contacted by the “Tenet” director or Universal Studios as the new film came together. In fact, the pair are full of questions about how the movie turned out, and how it compares to the series. “I wonder what attracted [Nolan] to Oppenheimer,” Caleb says.”
* their movie obv did
The book the movie is “based on” has nothing to do with the original series. They met briefly.
And yes. Straight PRIVATE conversations are in both. Straight SHOT FOR SHOT scene transitions. Oppenheimer invites his future wife out and invites her husband too. Same response. Cut tot riding horses. Same way. All the private moments are exact.
Of course it was gonna have the senate hearings and all that and be based on truth. But a scene for scene remake? The same exact private lines of “made up” dialog? Do you think this mans entire lifes dialogue is written down. The OG writers made a lot of that shyt up based on info. Nolan just relaid it down as is and cut around it.
Why dont yall rewatch the bbc film for yaselves. They didnt remake “fat man and little boy” they remade the bbc series. Why are those films comoletely diff but these 2 are the exact same movies. EXACT.
If any other big director did this they would be shyt on. Guy took an entire script and just replaced actors and cut out exposition wnd placed his name on it. The only scene i didnt see in this flick were the fukk scenes (and they are def cribbed as well, from both the series and oppenheimers infamous interview himself) and the dissapointed winstein scene used in beginning and end.
What a writer…
I dont expect brand new information. But i expected something new brought to the table somewhat. Obviously there is a degree of artistic lisence taken wiyh any movie. Ive NEVER seen a director get writing credit for cribbing an entire film before and be hailed as some revolutionary filmmaker.
And i dont even know why first guy bringing up the black and white. Thats the one artistic thing he brought to the entire picture. Atleast he did that.
Even the revelation of strauss being behind it all (complete with wife flipping out over it) and all his behind the scenes talks are EXACTLY the same. Beat for beat, same movie. Close ups of the wifes face as oppenheimer tells his story at the clearance hearing. Her being mad after. Annoying lawyer. You telling me they couldnt change it up a little? That it “all happened tbis way”. Get real.
Yall bytch about remakes all day yet sucking this mans dikk when he just straight shot for shot remade a film and didnt even advertise the fact or does anyone seem to know.
What i expected is all his public appearance stuff to be the same. Instead EVERYTHING was. The shots. How they transition. What they transition to. Its more than dialogue.
This film is a paint by numbers copy. Fact. In any other profession, this is plagiarism. He dint even know how to properly give credit to source material.
The only Nolan films I stan are in the Batman trilogy lmao. I just check the thread, from time to time, to see people’s thoughts on the movie. I thought yours was funny because because you really mad about this.
The energy you put into this dissertation. I ain’t even mad, I write them too when I’m passionate about a subject. Just understand it won’t be a concern to me when I go see it this week lol.
Bugzbunny129
All Star
The only Nolan films I stan are in the Batman trilogy lmao. I just check the thread, from time to time, to see people’s thoughts on the movie. I thought yours was funny because because you really mad about this.
The energy you put into this dissertation. I ain’t even mad, I write them too when I’m passionate about a subject. Just understand it won’t be a concern to me when I go see it this week lo
Laugh out loud bruh
I find it equally hilarious people are defending something they themselves have no idea about because they stan a director. I fukk with nolan but i am dissapointed that ive see this film before and couldn't put my finger on it. All my posts are dissertation-esque.
And noone can say anything about it cause its all there.
Thanks for just accepting the L for nolan since you dont have the facts. You are a bigger man for it!
And yes one of the buggest films of the year is a 85% carbon frame by frame copy, in the era where people are saying filmmaking is dying, one of the most respected filmmakers just did a paint by numbers film. Yea. Its kinda annoying to me. For sure.
Give me a TLDR of your bullshyt. I'm not reading all of thisLook at these stans all mad. Its bigger than retelling what happened. Besides the public talks, everything else is the same. Dialogue. Shots. Reactions. Transitions. Story beats.
Nolan did NOT write this movie. Is my point.
The Original ‘Oppenheimer’: How the BBC Brought the Father of the Atom Bomb to Life Long Before Christopher Nolan (EXCLUSIVE)
Decades before Christopher Nolan's movie, a BBC exec went to America to make a $1.5 million TV show about J. Robert Oppenheimer.variety.com
“Goodchild who used his research to write a book on Oppenheimer that published alongside the series in 1980 — had some interaction with Kai Bird, co-author of the 2005 Oppenheimer biography “American Prometheus” that Nolan’s film is based on. However, neither he nor Caleb were contacted by the “Tenet” director or Universal Studios as the new film came together. In fact, the pair are full of questions about how the movie turned out, and how it compares to the series. “I wonder what attracted [Nolan] to Oppenheimer,” Caleb says.”
* their movie obv did
The book the movie is “based on” has nothing to do with the original series. They met briefly.
And yes. Straight PRIVATE conversations are in both. Straight SHOT FOR SHOT scene transitions. Oppenheimer invites his future wife out and invites her husband too. Same response. Cut tot riding horses. Same way. All the private moments are exact.
Of course it was gonna have the senate hearings and all that and be based on truth. But a scene for scene remake? The same exact private lines of “made up” dialog? Do you think this mans entire lifes dialogue is written down. The OG writers made a lot of that shyt up based on info. Nolan just relaid it down as is and cut around it.
Why dont yall rewatch the bbc film for yaselves. They didnt remake “fat man and little boy” they remade the bbc series. Why are those films comoletely diff but these 2 are the exact same movies. EXACT.
If any other big director did this they would be shyt on. Guy took an entire script and just replaced actors and cut out exposition wnd placed his name on it. The only scene i didnt see in this flick were the fukk scenes (and they are def cribbed as well, from both the series and oppenheimers infamous interview himself) and the dissapointed winstein scene used in beginning and end.
What a writer…
I dont expect brand new information. But i expected something new brought to the table somewhat. Obviously there is a degree of artistic lisence taken wiyh any movie. Ive NEVER seen a director get writing credit for cribbing an entire film before and be hailed as some revolutionary filmmaker.
And i dont even know why first guy bringing up the black and white. Thats the one artistic thing he brought to the entire picture. Atleast he did that.
Even the revelation of strauss being behind it all (complete with wife flipping out over it) and all his behind the scenes talks are EXACTLY the same. Beat for beat, same movie. Close ups of the wifes face as oppenheimer tells his story at the clearance hearing. Her being mad after. Annoying lawyer. You telling me they couldnt change it up a little? That it “all happened tbis way”. Get real.
Yall bytch about remakes all day yet sucking this mans dikk when he just straight shot for shot remade a film and didnt even advertise the fact or does anyone seem to know.
What i expected is all his public appearance stuff to be the same. Instead EVERYTHING was. The shots. How they transition. What they transition to. Its more than dialogue.
This film is a paint by numbers copy. Fact. In any other profession, this is plagiarism. He dint even know how to properly give credit to source material.
Bugzbunny129
All Star
Come at me for finding out yall hero a fraud, put the burden of proof on me.
And then be unable to read the WHOLE 5 paragraph 2 mins of text to accept you dont know what the fukk your talking about
Yall remedial as fukk sometimes. Heavily. But what should i expect from a forum that communicates through smileys because their reading comprehension is 2nd grade level
I guess retelling a true story makes him a fraud. You niccas is fkin weird
And FTR, I CHOSE not to read your bullshyt. do not insult my intelligence
Bugzbunny129
All Star
Again. Learn to read at a qualifying level and you will find the info for which you seekI guess retelling a true story makes him a fraud. You niccas is fkin weird
And FTR, I CHOSE not to read your bullshyt. do not insult my intelligence
You the one asking questions you dont wanna read the answer to, calling me out by name to waste my time.
This fukking place i tell ya.
Heres some smileys so you understand
Me
You
Me
You
Me.
You
Me.
