And so what
, it's some weirdo slash egoistical shyt
The real heavyweights like Steven Spielberg,James cameron,George Lucas et al don't go around including their name in the title
they do.
but unlike nolan they avoid repetitive crass hackneyed in-your-face self-ingratiating odes to intelligensia ...
"ohhhh the date is clicking just like a geiger-counter".
"ohhhh tenet is the same spelt backwards".
"ohhhh the last scene reveal is soooooo consequential".
"ohhhh face-still conveys emotions".
"ohhhh oh so clever science"
we get it chris ... you are really really clever
maybe a case for more show and less tell. he needs to turn down the volume on his obvious-isms.
villeneueve, ridley scott etc don't try so hard to show us how clever they are, while simultaneously effortlessly doing just that.
it's like Scorsese with the gangster-isms. Tarantino with the wisecracks.
these things work most of the time but when overplayed they suggest hubris and seem repetitive.
nolan is good-to-great but he risks becoming a parody of himself. like tarantino and Scorsese to become a great Nolan will have to transcend himself i.e. grow up.
on a related note, compare black hole discussion in event horizon with interstellar for
entertainment value.
