It was obvious as hell until people tried to make it about Tory fukking both and people mad Meg lied to Gail king about jtShe texted Meg’s bodyguard moments after the shooting saying “Tory shot Meg” and in her first interrogation by police said Tory shot her. she didn’t recant til much later after she admitted that there was some discussion of bribery without full on saying it.
Add on to Tory sending the apology text, the defense own witness saying they saw Tory shooting, gun residue on him, DNA being inconclusive (no dna was found on the magazine, it was inconclusive on the gun. All that means he ain’t load the gun). It was always pretty clear what happened.
The reality is, they was probably all fighting, Kelsey and Tory fought over the gun, Tory shot at Meg’s foot on some drunk shyt/bruised ego after she talked shyt about his music career. He later contacted both Meg and Kelsey and offered money for them to keep quiet. Kelsey took the money and switched up her story but is just a bad liar and looked crazy on the stand.
Tory’s defense didn’t even put up a compelling argument for Kelsey being the shooter. Their argument was “Meg slept around, so her friend had more of a motivate to shoot her”? Huh? That don’t even make sense. So Kelsey shot Meg because she’s so upset they slept with the same person and then Tory grabbed the gun and let off in the air is the story people want me to believe? That just never made much sense to me. The more obvious explanation is the dude who has always had a complex and is a fake gangster wannabe pulled out a gun in the heat of a fight/argument and let off some rounds at Meg’s feet.
Meg told The truth in court tho…why Tory ain’t get on the stand?