I hate you so muchYou pumping him up like gas
I hate you so muchYou pumping him up like gas
Good to see that you think this is a fukkin joke. You laugh while he makes racially derogatory statements to and about black posters. Meanwhile you’re in here standing up for him more than you stand up on behalf of your own. With that man to man deflection option - because he talks about movies and shows.I hate you so much
This doesn't just go for white people though. Trust is something earned, not given, regardless of whether they're black, white, man, woman, whatever.
Good to see that you think this is a fukkin joke. You laugh while he makes racially derogatory statements to and about black posters. Meanwhile you’re in here standing up for him more than you stand up on behalf of your own. With that man to man deflection option - because he talks about movies and shows.
He’s the one that called you a “boy” and yet you have more words to cover for him than you did to check the disrespectful nature of his posts coming at everybody else. The type of disconnect is what- like the more that I think about it, how can you sit there and just pass this off like the context of his comments aren’t right there??
Repeat offender I see.@MartyMcFly still dodging this thread, I see. I guess taking a stand against racism and white privilege in the entertainment industry only goes so far when it involves your white hero.
lol @ all the black guys with the big smirks and that shook white lady.
So I guess black children being murdered and raped by the slave masters were given passes. And Nat Turner took that up as a method of self defense - he didn’t make white slave owners inflict brutal violence against black people to make them rise up in the first place.Yes, I'm white. But ignoring your simpleton race baiting shyt, Nat Turner did murder children. No matter how just the cause he was fighting for, that's something I never want to see glorified.
I'm iffy about Nat Turner glorification but I do have to say it is a master stroke of trolling genius to call it The Birth Of A Nation.
That’s an inside joke between me and @Tanahashi Coates which is why I told him I hate him. That’s why I laughed and he knows why I laughed
And this is who they die on a hill for to position against other black posters.It's not even about the content of the cases. It's about the fact that people did not accept the result of the Zimmerman trial, and the same can be said about Parker's case. You can call it an (over)simplified comparison but at the end of the day it's nonsensical to support the notion that a court ruling is always the correct ruling, so the mere fact that he was cleared of his charges in itself is not proof of his innocence.
I only used Zimmerman as an example because it's an obvious case of people disagreeing with the court ruling, I'm not sure what's so hard to get about that.
You're really defending that cac? Did you read the last quoted post?Most humans understand the concept of context throughout dialogue, you on the other hand work as a computer system that picks all the racial buzz words in a poster's post history, regardless of the contextual meaning, slaps them all together in a string of posts, and think you've done something. Go sell your cunt and stop being annoying on internet forums
Yeah gawd forbid you actually come into TLR where we hold while people accountable for their racism and racist talking points. Instead of you know, express their racist thoughts under the guise of movies and films.Now I know why you never come to TLR
Yes, I'm white. But ignoring your simpleton race baiting shyt, Nat Turner did murder children. No matter how just the cause he was fighting for, that's something I never want to see glorified.
I'm iffy about Nat Turner glorification but I do have to say it is a master stroke of trolling genius to call it The Birth Of A Nation.
It's not even about the content of the cases. It's about the fact that people did not accept the result of the Zimmerman trial, and the same can be said about Parker's case. You can call it an (over)simplified comparison but at the end of the day it's nonsensical to support the notion that a court ruling is always the correct ruling, so the mere fact that he was cleared of his charges in itself is not proof of his innocence.
I only used Zimmerman as an example because it's an obvious case of people disagreeing with the court ruling, I'm not sure what's so hard to get about that.
All the shyt you mention about Zimmerman's behavior is fukking circumstantial and you call me the idiot?
If you want to twist Zimmerman's case into whether him killing Trayvon was legal or not, you can twist Parker's case into whether him having sex with the woman was consensual or not since he already admitted he had sex with her. See how easy it is to pick & choose your own interpretations out of favoritism?
Again, it's obvious there's an agenda at work here but let's not act like all of a sudden people who question the court system almost on the daily start taking their judgment as gospel out of favoritism. It's one or the other, not this pick & choose shyt.