It’s proven that separate can never be equal if property taxes change the dynamics of primary education
Next steps: Republicans say they're repealing minority-targeted scholarship programs
- Thread starter RamsayBolton
- Start date
Wow. Thanks for that. What can we do this this info?
Wait... what?
You think black people are worse off now than they were during segregation.... but you don't think black people were better off during segregation than they are now?
Your brain is fried.
As insane as it sounds, he was arguing FOR Jim Crow
Nahh you’re just remedial“Black people were in a ‘better position’ economically during segregation, but that doesn’t mean they were ‘better off’ economically during segregation”
The word knots we tie ourselves into
A person who has been working a dead end job with no career advancement opportunities but has saved some money can quit their dead end job and use their savings to go back to college to increase their earning potential.
That person who had a full-time job with 6 months of emergency savings is in a better economic position than a recent college grad with no job. That does not mean they’re “better off” than the college grad because the college grad has a higher earning potential and statistically will earn more over a lifetime.
I think your brain is fried because you spend too much time on this website that you’re passing off your lack of reading comprehension as my posts
Kyle C. Barker
Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
Nahh you’re just remedial
A person who has been working a dead end job with no career advancement opportunities but has saved some money can quit their dead end job and use their savings to go back to college to increase their earning potential.
That person who had a full-time job with 6 months of emergency savings is in a better economic position than a recent college grad with no job. That does not mean they’re “better off” than the college grad because the college grad has a higher earning potential and statistically will earn more over a lifetime.
You're ignoring so many economic variables with this statement.
For one, the person who saved up 6 months worth of emergency savings can go back to college too (and much easier than person one might I add).
The second person is also in a much better position to invest in stocks/property since they have capital while person one will be in school for 4 years getting pummeled by inflation.
Edit: nevermind, I see you're gish galloping trying to defend jim crow lol. You spent 7 weeks coming up with that response?!?
Last edited:
There isn’t a second person dumbass
Let me make it as remedial as possible:
A person working a stable but dead end job with no career advancement opportunities and money saved up is in a better economic position than a recent college graduate that has yet to gain employment.
That same person is not “better off” not going to college because over time that college graduate will earn significantly more over a lifetime in addition to career advancement, higher quality of life, longer lifespan etc etc.
The point being illustrated that being in a better position economically is not the same as being “better off”
You can’t quote a single post of me defending Jim Crow but then again you can barely read in the first place
It didn’t take make 7 weeks to come up with a reply. I’m actually successful and have a life outside thecoli. This is just entertainment
If that’s what your brain interpreted then the public school system failed youAs insane as it sounds, he was arguing FOR Jim Crow
Carter Blanche aack of shyt
Hes correct though as hes talking about economics where black americans as an unintended consequence of jim crow/segregation was them being able to build economic wealth as they were forced to do most if not all their business within the communities they were segregated into. If we listen to you guys, the narrative would be black people never could build their own communities when american history has said otherwise. Obviously, the government and america has always gotten in the way so you had towns like tulsa oklahoma being destroyed and etc etc whether its through some state ordered riot or urban renewal. They are always trying go prevent black people from being great. However certain circumstances would change all that by the end of the 60s. There were many wealthy black communities like the hill district in pittsburgh. You clearly dont research and youre a democrat shill so youre not about uplifting black people. You act as an apologist for white supremacist on the left telling us to vote for them. You support politicians who do not support or havent done shyt for the black community and even anti black shyt.
Last edited:
Low Quality Posting
That’s his posting style. @8WON6 just called him out for doing the same thing.
I clearly said “black people were in a better economic position during Jim Crow than today”
He changes that to:
All he does makes strawman arguments against things you never even said buries these arguments in a massive post that takes up half the page
Yes he does. Dude literally is just talking in circles because hes knows that what hes standing by is bullshyt. Then when enough people tell him to sit down, he acts like a victim looking for sympathy.
Holy shyt you're dumb.
I never claimed that. That’s not even remotely close.
You already got a Low Quality Post warning the first time you denied saying it.
The fact that you think you can win this one to the point that you keep upping the thread.
