Brother....I'm clarifying what the media said.
They were either repeating what prosecution told them or witnesses.
There is no video of the man being shot outside either, but this is what the news reported.
But we can see on camera her trying to wrestle the gun from the boy, like the media said
so they dropped the charges because Twitter influenced them to but they had video that clearly showed them a crime was committed. And you are calling us insane.
You don't know what the prosecutor was basing her statements on. Could have been the police report, but it undoubtedly wasn't video as such you claim or we wouldn't be here.
Smh, this is not about defending the dude who got shot. This is about what this woman as a mother did to her child. Y'all really think traumatizing your 14 year old son and risking his future by getting him involved in a physical fight with a fully grown man and telling him to kill someone is not bad parenting The boy is supposed to be reading comic books, not carrying weapons and being his mothers bodyguard. Of course punshing her in the face was wrong, but she could have avoided this whole situation by just buying her food and leaving instead of continuing the argument. When the video starts, he is pleading with her to shut up and leave him alone, but she doesn't. So there was no immedeate threat that warrented for her to call for help. She could have just left it alone. Instead, she apparently told her son to come and bring a weapon. The responsible thing would have been to just leave, not involving a child into this mess. Her than telling that child to keep shooting even after that guy was injured and fled and then telling him to kill a woman that didn't pose a thread is completely fukked up. And even if they will get off, her son will carry this shyt with him for the rest of his life. He killed a man at 14 because his mother is irresponsible
Colincel babblePeople realy think that it's okay to shoot an unarmed man in the back as they run away from you ....the coli.com
How was this situation avoidable?I think the saddest thing about this scenario is that everyone commenting on this situation is saying something along the lines of "he had it coming" and that this won't have any negative effect on the young man who killed someone. Situation seemed completely avoidable to me, I don't understand the praise.
So because she said it, it must be true? The most obvious answer is she lied. I really don't give a fukk what she initially said because at this point we know what we initially started turned out not to be true. There is no way she is sitting on proof a crime was committed to save face for social media. And since they decided to drop the charges they could have just released the entire video, they could release the text messages. The video you want to exist doesn't exist. Give it up breh, and stop talking in absolutes on shyt you have no direct knowledge of.
THE PROSECUTOR SAID
IT WAS BASED ON SURVEILLANCE FOOTAGE.
YOU nikkaS RUNNING IN
THE THREAD LATE AS fukk
POSTING DUMB shyt.
YOURE NOT FROM HERE
AND YOURE NOT FAMILIAR
WITH THIS WISHY WASHY ASS D.A.
SHES THE SAME BROAD WHO
DECIDED TO CHARGE R.KELLY
DUE TO A TV SHOW
AND DROP ALL CHARGES
ON JUSSIE SMOLLET...
SO YEA SHE DOES CONFORM
TO SOCIAL PRESSURE.
OUTSIDE OF THAT SHES
VERY LENIENT AND A BIG
REASON CRIME HAS RISEN
IN THE CITY.
SHE GIVES SLAPS ON
THE WRISTS FOR EVERYTHING
AND LETS ALL TYPES CRIMINALS
BACK ON THE STREETS.
THE FACT THAT SHE WOULD
CHARGE A FELLOW
BLACK WOMAN WITH MURDER
IS TELLING.
SHE DEFINITELY SAW ENOUGH
TO CHARGE HER
AND I GUARANTEE SHE PULLED
THOSE TEXT MESSAGES BEFORE
MAKING A DECISION.
So because she said it, it must be true? The most obvious answer is she lied. I really don't give a fukk what she initially said because at this point we know what we initially started turned out not to be true. There is no way she is sitting on proof a crime was committed to save face for social media. And since they decided to drop the charges they could have just released the entire video, they could release the text messages. The video you want to exist doesn't exist. Give it up breh, and stop talking in absolutes on shyt you have no direct knowledge of.
So you agree she is a liar, and you can't believe anything she says, yet you choose to believe she saw a video that we have no proof exist?
THE SAME WAY SHE
HAD PROOF JUSSIE SMOLETT LIED
AND STILL DROPPED ALL CHARGES?
STOP BEING PURPOSELY DENSE.
Good point.
But the initial info in the article and the info in the article after the charges were dropped literally still have the same information in it.
With prosecution not telling us about any new evidence coming to light to exonerate the mother and son of wrong doing.
In the initial article, I believed it stated that the prosection already was aware that the man had hit the woman.
So whether they had access to the cell phone footage at the time, doesn't matter.
fukk the deceased family.For the umteenth time, the boy eliminated the threat with deadly force, but he wasn't suppose to eliminate the life afterwards. I honestly don't believe the decease's family members would have blamed that boy for shooting him to protect his mother, especially after seeing how their loved one was pounding on her. But I'm sure that boy following him outside, and finishing him off, changed their minds. Plus it put the mother and the boy in danger. Why is that so hard for people to see, I don't know.
So you agree she is a liar, and you can't believe anything she says, yet you choose to believe she saw a video that we have no proof exist?