The articles written before the video was posted were horribly written. It was confusing about exactly what happened. I didn't see the woman spit on the guy like some article was saying. He clearly initiated the physical confrontation.
You see him hitting her there and people running out. How long was it before the son came into the store? It clearly had to be at least a few more seconds before he came in and saw his mother getting beaten. If he sees his mom getting punched in the face, then I think shooting him in the back would be justified there. However, it becomes an issue when leaving the store and shooting the man as he was allegedly fleeing, and then the mother allegedly telling her son to shoot a witness.
I'll wait for more information to come out about the later parts, as the original articles seem to be inaccurate and poorly written.
If the son shot the guy in the back OUTSIDE of the store if the man was running away, then he's toast.
You see him hitting her there and people running out. How long was it before the son came into the store? It clearly had to be at least a few more seconds before he came in and saw his mother getting beaten. If he sees his mom getting punched in the face, then I think shooting him in the back would be justified there. However, it becomes an issue when leaving the store and shooting the man as he was allegedly fleeing, and then the mother allegedly telling her son to shoot a witness.
I'll wait for more information to come out about the later parts, as the original articles seem to be inaccurate and poorly written.
If the son shot the guy in the back OUTSIDE of the store if the man was running away, then he's toast.