some of yall are slow. The articles state the 1st shot happened when he hit the mother. The video only shows the 1st shot and matches the story. What the video doesnt show is what happened before the fight or after the first shot which is why they are in trouble. The argument clearly had been going on for a while before the video started cause dude is telling her just to take her food and go. The articles state the guy ran after being shot. The kid chased him down and shot him in the back and the mother told him to keep shooting and execute him. Then she tried told him to shoot the girlfriend/witness as well and when he didnt she tried grabbing the gun to do it but the kid didnt let her. Video is not the only evidence used in court. Eye witnesses and forensics are just as important and they can see where the body ended up (since he ran), determine how and where he was shot and find shell casings etc.Honestly it seems you are playing stupid. The video pretty much tells us the initial article/details are inaccurate. Also in the video you can clearly hear her tell him to go get back in the car. Do you think she would have called him in there to intervene only to tell him to get back in the car? If anything it seems like she knew the situation might escalate and didn't want him involved.
Why are you taking the article to be fact piece?some of yall are slow. The articles state the 1st shot happened when he hit the mother. The video only shows the 1st shot and matches the story. What the video doesnt show is what happened before the fight or after the first shot which is why they are in trouble. The argument clearly had been going on for a while before the video started cause dude is telling her just to take her food and go. The articles state the guy ran after being shot. The kid chased him down and shot him in the back and the mother told him to keep shooting and execute him. Then she tried told him to shoot the girlfriend/witness as well and when he didnt she tried grabbing the gun to do it but the kid didnt let her. Video is not the only evidence used in court. Eye witnesses and forensics are just as important and they can see where the body ended up (since he ran), determine how and where he was shot and find shell casings etc.
some of yall are slow. The articles state the 1st shot happened when he hit the mother. The video only shows the 1st shot and matches the story. What the video doesnt show is what happened before the fight or after the first shot which is why they are in trouble. The argument clearly had been going on for a while before the video started cause dude is telling her just to take her food and go. The articles state the guy ran after being shot. The kid chased him down and shot him in the back and the mother told him to keep shooting and execute him. Then she tried told him to shoot the girlfriend/witness as well and when he didnt she tried grabbing the gun to do it but the kid didnt let her. Video is not the only evidence used in court. Eye witnesses and forensics are just as important and they can see where the body ended up (since he ran), determine how and where he was shot and find shell casings etc.
No, the mom told the son to go to the car when the argument started, instead the son grabbed his moms gun and came back to dude beating the shyt out of his mom.The son was waiting in the car, the mother could have just taken her food and left and would have never gotten punched.
But she was suppose to fight a man by herself?
A fight she didn't start at that
Yall living in lala land
Doesnt matter what was said that led up to it. He punched her because he was fed up with her words and got shot for that. Unless you believe words are cause to punch a woman. Doesnt even really matter who the mother told the boy to shoot. It shows the boy had enough sense not to listen to his emotional mama and kill innocent people. He shot the one person he saw as a threat
The Mother is educated, has a degrees, owns multiple properties, worked with several community organizations, no criminal history,gun was registered & licensed..
She literally pulled up in a clean ass whip with pro black flags..
Yall turned her into a section 8 hoodrat who sent her son on a murder spree...Even tho the video shows different
Im seeing Maga & White Feminists defend her more than yall nikkas..
Cause They are more factual than random folks speculating on Twitter and facebook.Why are you taking the article to be fact piece?
And now his life is ruined caused that's not how the law works. The first shot can be justified as self defense. Chasing someone down and shooting them in the back isn't.
The article is written to make the mother look terrible but I knew something was up once I saw the background of all parties. The mother is educated, makes a decent living, and has good children. The other dude is a literal goon with a long criminal record.The Mother is educated, has a degrees, owns multiple properties, worked with several community organizations, no criminal history,gun was registered & licensed..
She literally pulled up in a clean ass whip with pro black flags..
Yall turned her into a section 8 hoodrat who sent her son on a murder spree...Even tho the video shows different
Im seeing Maga & White Feminists defend her more than yall nikkas..