first, the other side is not lawyered up. that nikka is talking shyt. second, intent supersedes sales. if intent can be proven before a sale is made, a claim to the trademark for THAT market (water, in this instance) can be argued and successfully won. am i saying that nigerian would win? he should, with the right counsel. if you all are so convinced this idea was NOT stolen, why is it that this mollywater nikka only just now appeared. there is zero trace of him when mining google for mentions. his google ranking isn't even worth mentioning. everything about this dude's venture screams, ", oh, shyt. molly plus water? = $$$$ let me get on that shyt quick"
and mollywater can't issue a cease and desist, because it came after nigerian's company. and the proof of that is readily available.
at this nikka bringing up google - fukk you are stupid