Jesus H. Christ
I died for your sins
at republicans choosing Michael Steele for RNC just so they can say that they are an inclusive party.
*puts on tinfoil hat* go on....
at republicans choosing Michael Steele for RNC just so they can say that they are an inclusive party.
Funny in all seriousness I should just save my thoughts on this subject in a word document. When I gather my thoughts, I'll make an entirely new thread for you.
But that's not what they did. You guys really think the Republicans are pandering? That's their problem. They don't pander at all. They don't even step up to bat. They have the mantra that either you are with us or against us.
But that's not what they did. You guys really think the Republicans are pandering? That's their problem. They don't pander at all. They don't even step up to bat. They have the mantra that either you are with us or against us.
chill, they were saying the same in 2004 about republicans never losing again.I read an article "2012 or Never" and they discussed on how if the Rethugs lose this election, they may forever lose the grip of national elections from now on due to the changing demographics, higher tolerance on homosexuals, and younger people being more educated than before. It's looking to become true cause the Rethugs base is filled with aging baby boomers that are slowly losing the grip on social issues.
i think that's what they did to an extent. Steele was kind of like a "test run" to see if we'd positively respond to it type thing. once they saw the experiment failed miserbly they gave him the boot and have since been on that "with us or against us" tip.
I'm more conservative politically, but I still voted for Obama in 08'.
What amazes me is how some Democrats honestly believe that parachuting Obama into the presidency wasn't "pandering" either. As if he weren't a "token" by any definition. Prior to Obama, GOP Presidents were pretty much alone in putting black faces in high places.
shyt...people can say what they like about the racial issues...but GWB had discussions with Condolezza and Colin Powell in the same room...making him da only white man in the room.
i think that's what they did to an extent. Steele was kind of like a "test run" to see if we'd positively respond to it type thing. once they saw the experiment failed miserbly they gave him the boot and have since been on that "with us or against us" tip.
chill, they were saying the same in 2004 about republicans never losing again.
nah with bush i believe it was geniune. see my last post. his bro is married to a latina so he's got love ...and as far as black folk he's genuinely not racist at all. (fukk kanye for his comments btw)Test Run?
Really?
What was Bush's entire administration?
" Bush had more African-Americans and Hispanics among his closest advisers than did Democratic challenger John Kerry, who won a majority of black and Hispanic votes."
USATODAY.com - Bush is opening doors with a diverse Cabinet
You can't even come from that angle sis. The problem with Republicans is that they operate under a system that we don't trust because race will always be a central role in our lives.
the electoral math favors Obama. all he has to do is get either Florida or Ohio and Romney has no real path to the white house. Ryan was a base pick they're conceding the independents and trying to turn out the base.this
plus Obama supporters dont seem exited so they will stay home and its all down to a few states and their electoral votes
The parallel? In 2004, Democrats chose an uncharismatic, wooden, super-rich intellectual from Massachusetts who was painted as a flip-flopping, out-of-touch elitist. In 2012, Republicans chose an uncharismatic, wooden, super-rich intellectual from Massachusetts who was painted as a flip-flopping, out-of-touch elitist -- only it was by his own party and during the primaries.