Let's face it to most women when it comes down to it men are disposable

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
70,500
Reputation
3,924
Daps
111,423
Reppin
Tha Land
why is a man supposed to take the lead of a person that is said to be his equal? can you lead someone and really be considered equal to them?
Yes you can. Equal doesn't mean equal rolls. It means equal opportunity, respect, and responsibility. A man and a woman should compliment each others traits, not do all the same stuff. The best leaders are those that walk with the people, not those that stand above them.

your definition of act like a man and act like a woman are outdated in the sense that this is the age of equality not the age of scarce resources where a woman's job is to sit at home and pop out babies, raise those babies, keep the cave together and a man's job is to get that spear and go kill something to feed them all and her value was in the ability that if it came down to it the species needed her for life to continue while he was disposable because any other man could fill his role.

Times have changed but rolls haven't. It's deeper than spears and caves. It's about your character. As a man and as a leader you are supposed to lead regardless of what any one else feels, or does. It's not about who brings the food home or who washes the dishes. It's about you as the man leading your family to prosperity. You make the decisions, not because you are superior to anyone else, or cause you make more money,but because your decisions are what makes the family prosper. If you take the leadership role and do it well your woman will look to you to lead her in the correct direction.

A dictator cannot be equal with the people, but a leader can.
 

Roid Jones

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
55,885
Reputation
7,578
Daps
166,789
One time I saw this guy beating up on his girl, and not to long into the fight this older guy stepped in and tried to stop him.....you know what happened?

The chick and her boyfriend ended up beating up the older guy, because she felt like he shouldn't have hit her man.

My nikka, I stood there like :dwillhuh: :mindblown:

This nikka came to save you and you turn around and help your boyfriend beat him up????? Where the hell they do that at :wtf:

shyt was crazy b. Cops had to come and break it up.

I have seen this happen before, it makes no sense to me
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
46,624
Reputation
3,964
Daps
70,707
Reppin
Michigan
The bottom line is as a man you got to take the lead, but leave those women that want to be on that equality with benefits nonsense alone. When you hear all of these 'smash the patriarchy feminists' prattling on, don't give them any of the benefits that a man will provide. Let them feel firsthand what the absence of a strong male provides. The male is only expendable because so many men choose to be and give away their benefits without requiring appreciation in return.
The attitude that a man must be a leader because he is a man and that is his role is nothing more than indoctrination. When you push that forward it enables those who want all of the good and none of the bad to pick and choose their points of equality without really being questioned.

A man must lead because deep down many women are inferior to him not because they are woman but because they choose to be so and due to that choice they have neither the capacity nor desire to lead. It's not that it's his responsibility as a man it's that if somebody doesn't step up and take the lead then chaos will ensue.
 

Un-AmericanDreamer

Simp City
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,740
Reputation
1,312
Daps
30,392
Yes you can. Equal doesn't mean equal rolls. It means equal opportunity, respect, and responsibility. A man and a woman should compliment each others traits, not do all the same stuff. The best leaders are those that walk with the people, not those that stand above them.



Times have changed but rolls haven't. It's deeper than spears and caves. It's about your character. As a man and as a leader you are supposed to lead regardless of what any one else feels, or does. It's not about who brings the food home or who washes the dishes. It's about you as the man leading your family to prosperity. You make the decisions, not because you are superior to anyone else, or cause you make more money,but because your decisions are what makes the family prosper. If you take the leadership role and do it well your woman will look to you to lead her in the correct direction.

A dictator cannot be equal with the people, but a leader can.

How can you lead if she has all the money though? You're gonna lead on her dime? shyt doesn't even make sense. I agree with the rest though. If you're gonna lead as a man, you're going to have to be the breadwinner because that's where the power lies.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
70,500
Reputation
3,924
Daps
111,423
Reppin
Tha Land
How can you lead if she has all the money though? You're gonna lead on her dime? shyt doesn't even make sense. I agree with the rest though.

Because she respects your descisions and expects you to make the correct ones. Money is nothing if you dont do the right things with it. She trusts you with her money more than she trusts herself.
 
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
16,276
Reputation
2,260
Daps
53,046
Reppin
Continental U.S.
Brehs we can't have it both ways. If you wanna be the leader in ya relationship you gotta act as such. The problem is ya nikkas want that lead role in name only. So ya want to be treated like u lead the relationship till danger come then cower and hide behind ya girl? :skip:

Ya nikkas might as well be gay. Then ya be the same nikkas crying bout women emasculating men out there.

SN: Of course I ain't taking a gunshot for a casual girlfriend but my wife and kids I'll die for, hell even my fiance i"ll die for.
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
46,624
Reputation
3,964
Daps
70,707
Reppin
Michigan
Yes you can. Equal doesn't mean equal rolls. It means equal opportunity, respect, and responsibility. A man and a woman should compliment each others traits, not do all the same stuff. The best leaders are those that walk with the people, not those that stand above them.



Times have changed but rolls haven't. It's deeper than spears and caves. It's about your character. As a man and as a leader you are supposed to lead regardless of what any one else feels, or does. It's not about who brings the food home or who washes the dishes. It's about you as the man leading your family to prosperity. You make the decisions, not because you are superior to anyone else, or cause you make more money,but because your decisions are what makes the family prosper. If you take the leadership role and do it well your woman will look to you to lead her in the correct direction.

A dictator cannot be equal with the people, but a leader can.
You are indoctrinated to the feminist agenda. Your thoughts of associating man and leader are what women want you to think because it furthers their agenda. If you don't question why you feel a man should lead then you become a toy soldier to a sex that many of which view you as disposable.

A man is not a leader by default because he is a man. If a man becomes a leader it's because who or what he is leading shuns the responsibility of leadership and he accepts that responsibility. Women are more than capable of leading they just don't want to because with leadership comes both it's ups and downs.

It's like the beta male wants to be treated like the alpha but wants none of the responsibility the alpha male carries. It is that attitude that makes both the beta male and women inferior. It's because they're choosing inferiority to relinquish responsibility.
 

Un-AmericanDreamer

Simp City
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,740
Reputation
1,312
Daps
30,392
Because she respects your descisions and expects you to make the correct ones. Money is nothing if you dont do the right things with it. She trusts you with her money more than she trusts herself.

She doesn't have to respect your decisions if her money is being used to sponsor your decision making, understand? There seems to be a relationship between money and leadership.
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
46,624
Reputation
3,964
Daps
70,707
Reppin
Michigan
Brehs we can't have it both ways. If you wanna be the leader in ya relationship you gotta act as such. The problem is ya nikkas want that lead role in name only. So ya want to be treated like u lead the relationship till danger come then cower and hide behind ya girl? :skip:

Ya nikkas might as well be gay. Then ya be the same nikkas crying bout women emasculating men out there.

SN: Of course I ain't taking a gunshot for a casual girlfriend but my wife and kids I'll die for, hell even my fiance i"ll die for.
I don't want to relinquish leadership or hide behind my girl. I simply don't want to stand in front of someone that views me as dispensable if push came to shove and who has a primary concern in a crisis is self preservation even if its at my expense. Someone who feels entitled to me protecting them and being willing to lay down my life for them because they feel that's my job because of my gender.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
70,500
Reputation
3,924
Daps
111,423
Reppin
Tha Land
She doesn't have to respect your decisions if her money is being used to sponsor your decision making, understand? There seems to be a relationship between money and leadership.

Yes she does. If she feels like her best chance of success is following your lead, she will follow you. Leaders don't have to possess the money, they have to direct the money.
 

MeachTheMonster

YourFriendlyHoodMonster
Joined
May 24, 2012
Messages
70,500
Reputation
3,924
Daps
111,423
Reppin
Tha Land
You are indoctrinated to the feminist agenda. Your thoughts of associating man and leader are what women want you to think because it furthers their agenda. If you don't question why you feel a man should lead then you become a toy soldier to a sex that many of which view you as disposable.
I lead because I am a man, and I am a man because I lead.

A man is not a leader by default because he is a man. If a man becomes a leader it's because who or what he is leading shuns the responsibility of leadership and he accepts that responsibility. Women are more than capable of leading they just don't want to because with leadership comes both it's ups and downs.
Women are capable leaders but they are better followers.

It's like the beta male wants to be treated like the alpha but wants none of the responsibility the alpha male carries. It is that attitude that makes both the beta male and women inferior. It's because they're choosing inferiority to relinquish responsibility.
You are in here complaining about responsibility. You want to act like a woman but be respected as a man. A man a leader doesn't sit around complaining about what others do/don't do. They go out and lead.
 

winb83

52 Years Young
Supporter
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
46,624
Reputation
3,964
Daps
70,707
Reppin
Michigan
I lead because I am a man, and I am a man because I lead.


Women are capable leaders but they are better followers.


You are in here complaining about responsibility. You want to act like a woman but be respected as a man. A man a leader doesn't sit around complaining about what others do/don't do. They go out and lead.
No you are a man because you were born with a penis. You lead because you choose to.
You have completely failed to explain the dynamic you're talking about. I in fact did a better job explaining why men lead than you did. You are a leader because you believe that an ancient dynamic that came into existence because it had to for the species to survive still applies even if the threat is gone just because it was established as a pattern back then. You seem to take pride in the fact that you're doing this job and that's fine but honestly your pride blinds you to the fact that many of these followers don't really appreciate your leadership they only feel entitled to it at times when that role is inconvenient to them. They want to stand next to you when it's sunny but behind you when the storm hits. If you knowingly let them do that you're a fool.

There's no real benefit to being a boss when your employees get paid the exact same amount you do and you get to take all the blame and fall on the sword when shyt hits the fan. At that point you're no longer a boss just a dispensable scapegoat in moments of crisis. If you knowingly or rather unknowingly accept that role it really makes you their fool. For taking the brunt of the negativity you should demand compensation beyond what they're seeing.
 
Top