no but i'll tell you what is stupid. someone makes a logically sound argument and while you don't agree with it you call it stupid without actually proving it so.
usually this is done because somebody doesn't really like what you're saying and beyond that they got nothing.
Honestly, your contributions in this thread are so piss-poor, I dont know where to begin. I mean, you're confusing the idea of men physically protecting their family, with a movement for equality. This idea that because women fought to be able to have more agency over their lives, and have the chance to perform physically neutral jobs (doesnt the fact that women want to work help the household?), should also mean they physically fight your battles or protect the household is one of the more asinine things Ive heard.
You use the example of sacrifice "women and children first", but how often does that happen in real life? Thats not the same as a man confronting a burglar, because its just common sense that a man would do that given his strength, versus that of his wife.