Because the ENTIRE concept of Brahminism is based on purity, dumbass. As her mother said, her mom broke a 1000-year line of staying within the Brahmin genetic purity and left.
Not to mention the whole part about her being a Black Baptist her entire life and never once identifying as Hindu or following the basic Brahmin Hindu rules regarding vegetarianism, caste purity, etc.
The funny thing is, by your argument you just admitted that she's Black, although your logic only works for race and doesn't work for religion.
Her family has a 1,000 year line of adhering to Brahmin Indian ideology and after one generation that line of thinking entirely went away
Gtfoh, Brahmin Indian Kamala Harris showed her full Brahmin ass with pushing for those truancy laws.
You claimed she was talking about the state law, when in the interview she is CLEARLY talking about the anti-truancy programs she ran in San Francisco and says nothing about the state law. And she had already explicitly denied that she would want to take the state law national and expressed regret for how others had abused it.
This is what I claimed:
Oh and the video also mention Kamala Harris is on record saying if she ran for President she'd make the truancy laws a national policy. Somebody might want to ask if she still intends to push for this. I wouldn't put it past a Brahmin to overstep and push for policies that will disproportionately put lower class individuals into the system. She's done it before.
The video I referenced does mention this, links to the above article and provides a reference.
You''re the one who lied and claimed she was convicted, jailed, had a conviction on her record which was hurting her job prospects. You made ALL of that up and are trying to hang on the last scraps of the false narrative you made up.
I was wrong about her conviction and right about her being in jail. Her and the interviewer both explicitly state multiple times she was in jail. You can say no she didn't until the cows come home but I can go to the actual person who will tell you she went to jail.
Breh, NOWHERE in that entire article does it ever say that Cheere Peoples was in jail. The article doesn't even use the word "jail" in reference to Peoples's case. It said she was ARRESTED, not put in jail. That's why they spend so long emphasizing the humiliation of being in handcuffs but don't say a single word about being put in a cell.
There's a reason why you haven't said whether she spent 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, etc. in jail, despite this being a famous case that people have talked about for over 10 years. That would be a clear feature of a story if it had happened. But you can't find it, and you're straight up quoting a story that never says she spent any time in jail at all as your "evidence". Because she was arrested, booked, and released by a right-wing Republican D.A. who was being a hardass for election cred in a right-wing Republican county.
You got caught lying, again, for the 4th or 5th time this thread.
Breh I linked this article as a point of reference of her arrest time being April 2013. The entire point of that follow up was to clear up your misunderstanding of the sentence you took out of context and to address your penchant for going on these weird off tangent rants based on your personal misunderstanding of the point being made (like you're doing, right now).
I referenced a video with her out her mouth saying she went to jail when I discussed her jail time.
I referenced that article when I'm speaking on the timeline of when it happened because you went on this weird tangent about 2010 and Kamala being District Attorney due to misreading that paragraph.