What is a biracial called in the land of black people?
Black.
What is a biracial called in the land of black people?
nope. it is always distinguished. whether it be 'coloured' or 'mixed' race. no way a half white or asian person is viewed as a pure african.Black.
Das what I'm sayingBathtub?
nope. it is always distinguished. whether it be 'coloured' or 'mixed' race. no way a half white or asian person is viewed as a pure african.
everyone has an admixture even whites, unless you live in an old world nation or something, you most likely have an admixture. but its what the vast majority are.(1) Black =/= pure African
(2) ADOS aren't pure Africans yet are Black, so that little logic you are using falls flat. And we aren't in South Africa, rather we are in America.
idpol in full effect
everyone has an admixture even whites, unless you live in an old world nation or something, you most likely have an admixture. but its what the vast majority are
you are behind and better figure it out before asking for reparation. some white parent is going to file and be all over it. white men allocating the funds to who knows where, white/latina women using it as child support, it'll be wild. Brazil already had an issue with this when they tried to give 'negroes' in the north scholarships. prados and white people out of no where became black, blonde and all.
same thing. african is not an ethnicity, black is. and I am showing you how the vast majority of black people view biracials and not through your outdated one-drop rule which appears to be being challenged (finally) by black people themselves as I see the thread title and Kamala's daily threads.Your argument was, Black = pure African. That's not true, pure African = pure African.
Black = of African descent.
same thing. african is not an ethnicity, black is. and I am showing you how the vast majority of black people view biracials and not through your outdated one-drop rule which appears to be being challenged (finally) by black people themselves as I see the thread title and Kamala's daily threads.
fixed and what you should be asking.why would I adopt the classification model of the white man.
How can she be a Brahmin Indian when her grandparents were Brahmin Indians and her mother was a Brahmin Indian? Really?How can she be a "Brahmin Indian" when she's not even Hindu? Kamala's mom had already broken all of her Brahmin caste's rules by marrying a non-Indian (thus rejecting her culture and destroying the genetic lines of caste purity),
Kamala NEVER mentions that California law in the interview, she's talking about her own anti-truancy programs that she ran as D.A. in San Francisco, where she helped reduce truancy by 30% without putting a single parent in jail. The Department of Education doesn't have any control of criminal law and wouldn't be able to make any law jailing parents for truancy, she's just talking about them implementing programs to try to reduce truancy among children.
I'm going to need someone to dig a little deeper in that given Brahmin Indian Kamala Harris's history on truancy laws. I'm also going to need timelines on what you're referencing when you say she'll drop the issue altogether. Was this at a later date than that 2019 Angela Rye interview?
She went "to" the jail to have her booking photo taken and be charged. She was never jailed.
Wrong yet again. The law was passed in 2010, Kamala was still just D.A. of San Francisco at the time (though she was running for Attorney General).
Kamala pushed for the law as the San Francisco D.A., but it was also officially endorsed by the California District Attorneys Association, the California State Parent-Teachers Association, and the California Teachers Association. It passed 58-17 in the Assembly and 23-13 in the Senate with strong bipartisan support and was signed by a Republican governor.
Like I said already, I don't support the idea at all and I'm not a fan of her time as prosecutor. But I'm also far-left on prosecution compared
Biden and by proximity Kamala since she is part of this administration really haven’t done anything for the have nots, if anything they sacrificed the people for the sake of corporations and the banks and I doubt a kamala administration is going to move the needle as far as helping the people is concerned, and the Ukraine war was provoked by the west because they got agendas that the public aren’t privy tooDems in power choose their positions about 50-50 weighing what the middle class wants and what the rich want (as opposed to Republicans, who 100% follow the rich - there's actually a political study on this exact topic). If their constiuencies in the middle class / rich want to help poor people, they'll do it, but that's not common. Dems in 1990s-2010s specifically were dominated by neoliberals who push capitalism and the global agenda and were especially close to Republicans-lite.
However, starting in 2016 and especially 2018-2020, there's been popular pressure pushing Democrats further to the left and somewhat more in support of the poor. As I noted back in 2019, Kamala was running on a fairly liberal agenda, though she hadn't been nearly as liberal when she was a DA/AG. Biden in 2020 was running on a MUCH more liberal agenda than he had legislated as a senator from the 1970s-2000s. Though he didn't govern quite as liberal as he ran, he still governed significantly more liberal than he used to be, even more liberal than Obama goverened when Biden was his VP.
I think Kamala, similarly, has been feeling that push from the left and will govern even more liberal than Biden.
This isn't true. The majority of Dems vote against the Republican tax cuts for the rich, increased military spending, authorizing the War in Iraq, etc. However, you are right that SOME dems vote for some of those things, and that sometimes included dems with power (like Hillary voted to authorize the Iraq War). And they deserve to take shyt for that when they do so.
How can she be a Brahmin Indian when her grandparents were Brahmin Indians and her mother was a Brahmin Indian? Really?
Breh I literally gave you these exact quotes in my post and and then my personal thoughts on it:
Rye asked Harris if she would "extend the [anti-truancy] program on a federal level, or try to figure out ways to address truancy on a federal level?"
"Yeah," Harris responded, "but as president it would be really doing it through the Department of Education. I did it through the mechanisms I had, because I wasn't running the city, I wasn't running the county. I wasn't running the state."
Again this is a fictional recount of the event that you made up.
The "at that time" in sentence two was the time Cheere Peoples went to jail. April 2013
The Human Costs Of Kamala Harris’ War On Truancy
The "progressive prosecutor" wanted to transform how California responded to students missing school. Parents like Cheree Peoples wound up paying the price.www.huffpost.com