Not a lie, Brahmin Indian Kamala Harris has in fact gone on record saying truancy would be something she'd look into if she ever became President.
How can she be a "Brahmin Indian" when she's not even Hindu? Kamala's mom had already broken all of her Brahmin caste's rules by marrying a non-Indian (thus rejecting her culture and destroying the genetic lines of caste purity), not to mention that she converted to Christianity and started eating meat which is strictly forbidden by her Brahmin caste. There's an old 2003 interview where Kamala's mom mentions that in marrying Donald Harris, she had broken a 1000-year bloodline of purity. Everything her mom fought for in joining the Black civil rights movement and teaming up with a bunch of Marxists is against Brahmin ideology. Kamala has identified as Black Baptist her entire life, attends church regularly, swore into office on a Bible. She recognizes her cultural heritage, but she's never identified as Hindu nor woud Brahmins acdept her as one.
"The
ritual purity of the Brahmans is maintained through the observance of numerous taboos, many of which relate to diet and contact with lower castes. Most Brahman castes are strictly
vegetarian, and their members must abstain from certain occupations. They may not plow or handle any impure material, such as leather or hides"
Brahman, highest ranking of the four varnas, or social classes, in Hindu India. The basis of the age-old veneration of Brahmans is the belief that they are inherently of greater ritual purity than members of other castes and that they alone are capable of performing certain vital religious tasks.
www.britannica.com
In 2019 this is what she said in an interview with Angela Rye
Harris's comments came during an interview with Angela Rye, a lawyer and liberal political commentator. Rye asked Harris if she would "extend the [anti-truancy] program on a federal level, or try to figure out ways to address truancy on a federal level?"
"Yeah," Harris responded, "but as president it would be really doing it through the Department of Education. I did it through the mechanisms I had, because I wasn't running the city, I wasn't running the county. I wasn't running the state."
Rye pressed her, asking, "do you think the Department of Education is more suited to handle truancy issues?"
"Yeah, I do," Harris said.
The Free Beacon is a right-wing newspaper, you just believed their bullshyt without checking the interview yourself? Kamala NEVER mentions that California law in the interview, she's talking about her own anti-truancy programs that she ran as D.A. in San Francisco, where she helped reduce truancy by 30% without putting a single parent in jail. The Department of Education doesn't have any control of criminal law and wouldn't be able to make any law jailing parents for truancy, she's just talking about them implementing programs to try to reduce truancy among children.
I'm going to need someone to dig a little deeper in that given Brahmin Indian Kamala Harris's history on truancy laws. I'm also going to need timelines on what you're referencing when you say she'll drop the issue altogether. Was this at a later date than that 2019 Angela Rye interview?
The Angela Rye interview was in August 2019. She had already definitively said that the attempts to jail parents were wrong and she wouldn't pursue such a law as president back in April 2019.
"Sen. Kamala Harris on Wednesday expressed “regret” over the “unintended consequences” of a 2011 California truancy law, which she supported as the state attorney general and which she said led to the criminalization of parents.
The presidential hopeful said in a clip posted by the podcast “Pod Save America” that it was “never the intention” that parents of children who missed too much school would be criminalized.
“My regret is that I have now heard stories that where, in some jurisdictions, DAs have criminalized the parents,” Harris said. “And I regret that that has happened and that, the thought that anything that I did could have led to that, because that certainly was not the intention, was never the intention. Never was the intention.”
Harris said the criminalization of parents happened “in other jurisdictions, not under my watch ever. I had no control over that.” The senator added when she was district attorney of San Francisco, from 2004 to 2011, “we never sent a parent to jail.”
Harris said she would not support a similar truancy law if she becomes president.
That's out her mouth in the interview that she went to jail.
She went "to" the jail to have her booking photo taken and be charged. She was never jailed.
At least you admit your past claims that she was convicted, jailed, and that she had the conviction on her record to hurt her job prospects were all false.
Also, Brahmin Indian Kamala was the Attorney General at that time and states-wide truancy laws were her pet project.
Wrong yet again. The law was passed in 2010, Kamala was still just D.A. of San Francisco at the time (though she was running for Attorney General).
Kamala pushed for the law as the San Francisco D.A., but it was also officially endorsed by the California District Attorneys Association, the California State Parent-Teachers Association, and the California Teachers Association. It passed 58-17 in the Assembly and 23-13 in the Senate with strong bipartisan support and was signed by a Republican governor.
Like I said already, I don't support the idea at all and I'm not a fan of her time as prosecutor. But I'm also far-left on prosecution compared
BECAUSE HE POINTED OUT
