Kamala's Racial Identity Discussion

that guy

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
5,479
Reputation
648
Daps
18,135
That's what I said. Now can you stop being a vague troll and actually expound on what your problem is. Aside from parading around like you're a Trump supporter.
You said “that is enough for me” meaning to you already have your mind made up that you expect nothing from the democratic candidate for the next four years. That’s why your thinking is retarded, not because you’re against project 2025.

“My only expectation for my vote for a candidate is to not be the other candidate”

Do you hear how stupid that sounds? This is how terrible politically discourse has become in the US.
 

Secure Da Bag

Veteran
Joined
Dec 20, 2017
Messages
40,150
Reputation
20,449
Daps
126,438
All I know is Kamala Harris is not Project 2025. Trump is though. So that's enough for me. :smugbiden:

You said “that is enough for me” meaning to you already have your mind made up that you expect nothing from the democratic candidate for the next four years. That’s why your thinking is retarded, not because you’re against project 2025.

“My only expectation for my vote for a candidate is to not be the other candidate”

Do you hear how stupid that sounds? This is how terrible politically discourse has become in the US.

How is it possible to jump to so many wrong conclusions from a one sentence post :dead:

So imagine you reading Project 2025 and still finding it in yourself to clown someone for saying "All I know is Kamala Harris is not Project 2025" because you are ok with what's in it?

That's me imagining you reading...... and nothing about anything you've posted in here shows you are read.
 

that guy

Superstar
Bushed
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
5,479
Reputation
648
Daps
18,135
All I know is Kamala Harris is not Project 2025. Trump is though. So that's enough for me. :smugbiden:

You said “that is enough for me” meaning to you already have your mind made up that you expect nothing from the democratic candidate for the next four years. That’s why your thinking is retarded, not because you’re against project 2025.

“My only expectation for my vote for a candidate is to not be the other candidate”

Do you hear how stupid that sounds? This is how terrible politically discourse has become in the US.
 

Ohene

Free Sheist
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
72,649
Reputation
6,100
Daps
124,836
Reppin
Toronto
Both of them had a Black father. Obama's mother was White, Kamala's mother was Indian.

Obama's father left before he was 2 and he never knew him. Kamala's father raised her until she was 7 and she continued to live with him on holidays and summer vacations through high school.

Obama grew up in Hawaii and Indonesia with almost no Black people around him. Kamala grew up in a majority black neighborhood in Berkeley until she was 12, and after that attended a 40% Black high school in Montreal.

Obama knew one radical Black socialist in Hawaii. Kamala was practically raised by an entire crew from the Afro-American Association in Berkeley.

Obama went to Columbia. Kamala went to Howard.


I don't think


Obama didn't get more "cred" for being Black until he moved to Chicago and started working as a community organizer in his mid-20s. Claiming "Obama is Black but Kamala is Indian" makes no objective logical sense.
It’s crazy
 

UpNext

Superstar
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Messages
4,439
Reputation
945
Daps
16,232
Why lie? Kamala said all the way back in 2019 that she didn't like how some D.A.'s abused the law and would never push for it nationally.

Not a lie, Brahmin Indian Kamala Harris has in fact gone on record saying truancy would be something she'd look into if she ever became President. In 2019 this is what she said in an interview with Angela Rye


Harris's comments came during an interview with Angela Rye, a lawyer and liberal political commentator. Rye asked Harris if she would "extend the [anti-truancy] program on a federal level, or try to figure out ways to address truancy on a federal level?"

"Yeah," Harris responded, "but as president it would be really doing it through the Department of Education. I did it through the mechanisms I had, because I wasn't running the city, I wasn't running the county. I wasn't running the state."

Rye pressed her, asking, "do you think the Department of Education is more suited to handle truancy issues?"

"Yeah, I do," Harris said.

According to the Center for American Progress, there is no national definition of truancy. States determine their own definitions of, and responses to, truancy—a reflection of America's historical preference for governing education at the state and local level.



I'm going to need someone to dig a little deeper in that given Brahmin Indian Kamala Harris's history on truancy laws. I'm also going to need timelines on what you're referencing when you say she'll drop the issue altogether. Was this at a later date than that 2019 Angela Rye interview?

Lying again. She was NEVER convicted of a crime, the charges were dismissed on August 12, 2015 without a trial ever taking place. She does NOT have to let prospective employers know she was convicted of a crime, because she never was. She complained at one point in the video that she has an ARREST on her record, not a conviction, and that she WORRIES it would impact her employment.

Okay she has an arrest on her record. Mistake on my part.


Lying again. She was arrested and booked under the orders of a conservative Republican D.A. in Orange County. She was never convicted and didn't spend any time in jail.

That's out her mouth in the interview that she went to jail. Also, Brahmin Indian Kamala was the Attorney General at that time and states-wide truancy laws were her pet project. Stop the deflecting. If Brahmin Indian Kamala was never born Ms. Peoples wouldn't have been arrested and would not have gone to jail.

Kamala Harris was just a D.A. in San Francisco when the California State Legislature passed the law with bipartisan support, and it was signed by a moderate Republican governor. She supported the law like many other D.A.'s did, but she didn't pass it or sign it.

Brahmin Indian Kamala Harris sponsored that bill, is specifically noted in that bill and out her own mouth takes full accountability for that bill. Not really sure what the shill is going on with this diatribe. This is what she said her first day as Attorney General




So, we are putting parents on notice. If you fail in your responsibility to your kids, we are going to work to make sure you face the full force and consequences of the law.


This is not the words of an individual with qualms about sending individuals to jail over child truancy. It's cold, ruthless and she fully understands that the people she is talking to when she makes statements like this are disproportionately poor/lower class.
 

Prince.Skeletor

Don’t Be Like He-Man
Bushed
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
28,754
Reputation
-7,239
Daps
55,730
Reppin
Bucktown
Why are you posting some random Filipina woman who just mass-spams right wing memes? :why:

Last week the right-wing talking point was that Kamala only claims her Indian heritage, this week the talking point is that Kamala refuses to claim her Indian heritage. :mjlol:

Because it's funny!

This entire debate is like who gives af
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,656
Daps
203,847
Reppin
the ether

2008

EVEN WITH THEIR FLAWS
NEITHER WERE BAD CHOICES
:devil:
:evil:


McCain / Palin was a horrible choice and Kamala if elected is almost certainly going to have a more progressive agenda than Obama did. :dead:


McCain got his ass kissed a lot because he was a war hero and a "maverick" who occasionally sided with Democrats and wasn't as bad a person as some Republicans. But he was a rich guy who consistently screwed over poor people, a massive warmongerer, and he backed almost every bad thing that Reagan did outside of trying to override Civil Rights legislation. Not to mention the fact that he picked SARAH PALIN to be his VP in a massive pander to the far right. He would have been terrible for the country as a president.

Not to mention that he was a huge proponent of legalizing illegal immigrants and was realtively liberal on LGBT, which I thought were your two big issues. :skip:
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
54,345
Reputation
11,543
Daps
368,806
Reppin
CHICAGO
McCain / Palin was a horrible choice and Kamala if elected is almost certainly going to have a more progressive agenda than Obama did. :dead:


McCain got his ass kissed a lot because he was a war hero and a "maverick" who occasionally sided with Democrats and wasn't as bad a person as some Republicans. But he was a rich guy who consistently screwed over poor people, a massive warmongerer, and he backed almost every bad thing that Reagan did outside of trying to override Civil Rights legislation. Not to mention the fact that he picked SARAH PALIN to be his VP in a massive pander to the far right. He would have been terrible for the country as a president.

Not to mention that he was a huge proponent of legalizing illegal immigrants and was realtively liberal on LGBT, which I thought were your two big issues. :skip:

I CLEARLY SAID "EVEN WITH THEIR FLAWS"


:devil:
:evil:



 
Top