I don’t think sooooI mean there's no other BP related stories announced. Your stance is too late. lol
I don’t think sooooI mean there's no other BP related stories announced. Your stance is too late. lol
Oh what's the next BP related project you plan on not seeing?I don’t think soooo
Right , but saying the obvious isn’t as fun as pretending like it was supposed to in order to fuel our narrativeIt’s been 15 years surely people didn’t think this cultural dominance the MCU and other comic book universes was gonna last forever right?
Disney obviously did hence by the details of the article. Common sense would have told them and anyone else who insisted as well that they were setting themselves up for failure tying the multiverse to multiple TV shows and movies, yet you had some posters in here insisting that it was okay.It’s been 15 years surely people didn’t think this cultural dominance the MCU and other comic book universes was gonna last forever right?
he had mystery in Loki. we didn't really see what he could do yet, so it sold the idea that he could be a universe threatening villain... then he showed up in Antman as the "conqueror" and shot lasers out of hands and delivered his lines like some Shakespeare in the Park jobber and shyt. oh and he had a dumb gyroscope egg ship or some shyt. wow, cool. "he is the master of time." we just left the Thanos saga where that motherfukker could fukk with time, and still had 5 other stones to do other shyt, all better than "pew, pew, i shoot shyt from my hands like 20 other characters we've seen already." Kang sucked, and if that's how they intended to intro that Kang, he would have sucked in any movie. Any props that character got was just because everyone was reaching for something decent in that dud of a movie.Problem with Kang was him being the villian in Ant Man. His variant was fine in Loki.
Its one situation where Feige probably should have just told Ali nah we good in hindsightThe problem with Blade is Disney had no interest in making it in the first place.