I'm not a christian anymore folks.

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,088
Reputation
8,084
Daps
120,344
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Lewis Black said:
Of course you would mop the floor with me in a debate when you say stuff like this.

No problem:

41OihvwP3BL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

4.5 Slavery

4.5.1 Definition

Freedom in the ancient Near East was a relative, not an absolute state, as the ambiguity of the term for "slave" in all the region's languages illustrates. "Slave" could be used to refer to a subordinate in the social ladder. Thus the subjects of a king were called his "slaves," even though they were free citizens. The king himself, if a vassal, was the "slave" of his emperor; kings, emperors, and commoners alike were "slaves" of the gods. Even a social inferior, when addressing a social superior, referred to himself out of politeness as "your slave." There were, moreover, a plethora of servile conditions that were not regarded as slavery, such as son, daughter, wife, serf, or human pledge.

A better criterion for a legal definition of slavery is its property aspect, since persons were recognized as a category of properly that might be owned by private individuals. A slave was therefore a person to whom the law of property applied rather than family or contract law. Even this definition is not wholly exclusive, since family and contract law occasionally intruded upon the rules of ownership. Furthermore, the relationship between master and slave was subject to legal restrictions based on the humanity of the slave and concerns of social justice.

:popcorn:
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
305,928
Reputation
-34,259
Daps
616,277
Reppin
The Deep State
Go theological noncognitivism and study what makes people tick. Atheism is illogical.


People are the cause of all that. BTW, 'scripture' hasn't changed. Vocabulary has. 'Slavery' in the Bible is not the same thing as what it became 1600 years later. This is an old and tired criticism that has been debunked and is invalid.



If you read them like the proverbial words of some 'deity', of course they'll seem that way. Read them like literature and they make a lot more sense.​

This man is condoning slavery ya'll. :dahell:

Look at him. :scust:
 

OG_StankBrefs

Da Spice...
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
27,540
Reputation
6,715
Daps
98,663
Reppin
Caladan
Keep sucking the 'White Man's' dikk.....

nones-demog-4.png


That's why your bref stank.

:youngsabo:



:dead: @ you thinkin a fukkin chart is gonna make believin in 2 humans populatin an entire planet, bodies of water turnin into blood, seven headed beasts, mufukkas turnin into pilars of salt and people livin to be hundreds of years old anymore plausible.

Go sitcho old ass down somewhere, nikka. :camby:
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,088
Reputation
8,084
Daps
120,344
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Napoleon said:
This man is condoning slavery ya'll. :dahell:

Look at him. :scust:

LOL. Your reading comprehension sucks.

THIS is what YOU mean by 'slavery'.......

http://www.dol.gov/dol/aboutdol/history/moynchapter3.htm

"[In the United States,] the slave was totally removed from the protection of organized society (compare the elaborate provisions for the protection of slaves in the Bible), his existence as a human being was given no recognition by any religious or secular agency, he was totally ignorant of and completely cut off from his past, and he was offered absolutely no hope for the future. His children could be sold, his marriage was not recognized, his wife could be violated or sold (there was something comic about calling the woman with whom the master permitted him to live a 'wife'), and he could also be subject, without redress, to frightful barbarities — there were presumably as many sadists among slaveowners, men and women, as there are in other groups. The slave could not, by law, be taught to read or write; he could not practice any religion without the permission of his master, and could never meet with his fellows, for religious or any other purposes, except in the presence of a white; and finally, if a master wished to free him, every legal obstacle was used to thwart such action. This was not what slavery meant in the ancient world, in medieval and early modern Europe, or in Brazil and the West Indies.

:popcorn:
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,088
Reputation
8,084
Daps
120,344
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
OG_StankBrefs said:
:dead: @ you thinkin a fukkin chart is gonna make believin in 2 humans populatin an entire planet, bodies of water turnin into blood, seven headed beasts, mufukkas turnin into pilars of salt and people livin to be hundreds of years old anymore plausible.

Go sitcho old ass down somewhere, nikka. :camby:

Where did I say you should believe that?

Where in the text does it state you should?

:popcorn:
 

Dafunkdoc_Unlimited

Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
44,088
Reputation
8,084
Daps
120,344
Reppin
The Wrong Side of the Tracks
Lewis Black said:
If being a slave was different back then why did mosses have to free them?

Because not all Ancient Near Eastern civilizations viewed slaves the same way. Some regarded them as nothing but property. Others regarded them as family members.​
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,481
Daps
26,219
I'm not even one of them atheist what thinks nothing came from nothing but recently ive been feeling like damn.....the bible some bullshyt man lol. Before christianity/islam etc there were people who believed that there religion was the one true religion, what makes us any different.

People out here quoting scriptures what have been changed, arguing if jesus was black, ignoring the bible was pro slavery etc it's ridiculous man. Where was this god when black people were getting raped, killed, hanged, eaten by alligators?

I believe in a higher power but the bible/quran/torah sounds like b.s to me.
There is no such thing as Christians anyway.

There is righteousness and submission to ur creator.
Evilness
White supremacy as a world system.

Everyone falls into one of those.


The black church unfortunately, falls into evilness and curruption along with the religion that white supremacist created
 
Top