You've already conceded fakkit. This is over. Don't start obsessing over me like some chic with a crush.that kid is a proud nubian warrior according to @Gravity and other one drop idiots
Keep my name out of your mouth cocksucker.
You've already conceded fakkit. This is over. Don't start obsessing over me like some chic with a crush:
You've already conceded fakkit. This is over. Don't start obsessing over me like some chic with a crush.
Keep my name out of your mouth cocksucker.
You've conceded that you're trying to redefine what "black" means to exclude biracials. That's an admission that you understand that biracials are black. That's all I've wanted from your stupid ass and now that you've done that it's over. No more debating over the shyt. You can keep mentioning/tagging/quoting me on the issue all you want. It's a wrap son. You lostconceded to what? you're a delusional idiot and i love putting it on display.
blake griffen is black right? black griffens son is black too right?
you idiot, i've always stated the race needs reorganization, this is nothing new. biracials gotta go and nikkas like you who think you can create black children from white women gotta goYou've conceded that you're trying to redefine what "black" means to exclude biracials. That's an admission that you understand that biracials are black. That's all I've wanted from your stupid ass and now that you've done that it's over. No more debating over the shyt. You can keep mentioning/tagging/quoting me on the issue all you want. It's a wrap son. You lost
No, before you were saying that biracials aren't black. Now you're saying that we need to reorganize the race to exclude biracials from being classified as black. That's two different positions.you idiot, i've always stated the race needs reorganization, this is nothing new. biracials gotta go and nikkas like you who think you can create black children from white women gotta go
No, before you were saying that biracials aren't black. Now you're saying that we need to reorganize the race to exclude biracials from being classified as black. That's two different positions.
Don't waste your time on me. You're never going to convince me to go along with that stupid shyt. Get your no life having ass off of this site for a change and go around campaigning seeing how many other blacks will go along with your position. When you've got enough support and power to enforce your position and prevent biracials from being classified as black in this society, then I'll take you seriously. Until then you're just worrisome ass nobody Internet geek.
Are you seriously advocating the racism classification system where every group separates themselves out like we did in the 1800's? Biracials will be different from octaroons, which will also be different from whatever racial admixture is out there. So while the "black" folk are busy separating themselves based on racial mixture, white are busy incorporating every fair skinned ethnic group into the official "white" classification. Black make themselves more insignificant while the percentage of "white" americans grows larger and larger, despite the negative birth rate in most anglo communities.i've never denied that biracials have been historically lumped in with black folks, which is inherently problematic.
and the construct will change, i dont have to fight for them to be re-classified, they're going to fight for separation themselves. it's going to be c*nts like you trying to persuade them to reject their white half on some "b-but what about slavery, the white man hates you too. you're black like me" type shyt
edit: oh, and i see you still dancing over my question. blake griffen is black right? black griffens son is black too, right? i bet you consider your white wife black as well
Gotdamn you have no integrity. You just tell blatant lies with no shame. You've been arguing that biracials aren't black for the longest.i've never denied that biracials have been historically lumped in with black folks, which is inherently problematic.
and the construct will change, i dont have to fight for them to be re-classified, they're going to fight for separation themselves. it's going to be c*nts like you trying to persuade them to reject their white half on some "b-but what about slavery, the white man hates you too. you're black like me" type shyt
edit: oh, and i see you still dancing over my question. blake griffen is black right? black griffens son is black too, right? i bet you consider your white wife black as well
Are you seriously advocating the racism classification system where every group separates themselves out like we did in the 1800's? Biracials will be different from octaroons, which will also be different from whatever racial admixture is out there. So while the "black" folk are busy separating themselves based on racial mixture, white are busy incorporating every fair skinned ethnic group into the official "white" classification. Black make themselves more insignificant while the percentage of "white" americans grows larger and larger, despite the negative birth rate in most anglo communities.
nikkas like yourself still don't understand the game huh...
Gotdamn you have no integrity. You just tell blatant lies with no shame. You've been arguing that biracials aren't black for the longest.
You've never seen me try and persuade anybody to claim anything. I've even told you over and over that race is a social construct based on what you look like. You can't choose your race and you certainly can't choose someone else's race for them. Blacks don't have the power to claim anybody. fukk a biracial that wants to run from being black. fukk a Raven Symone. fukk a Tiger Woods. They're c00ns just like you. You'll never see me tryna persuade c00ns like that to call themselves black. If biracials like those want to delude themselves into thinking that they're not black then that's on them. That wake up call is inevitable.
I'm just in awe of how stupid you and the posters who dap your posts are. Just look at what you've said here, you're basically saying that "biracials aren't black regardless of them being classified as black". Anybody who thinks that makes any kind of sense is an idiot.biracials aren't black, regardless of how they've been lumped into our group. stop running towards white classifications for your own agenda.
Except biracials do share our genetics. As AAs we are all mixed to some degree or another. The biracials that you want to exclude from our community are our direct descendants.we all know race is a social construct, does that mean we shouldn't preserve our genetics? our culture? everything that makes black people "black"?
This is the kind of corny feminine shyt that you need to let go of bruh. You're only forced to resort to shyt like this because you know understand up on its on. It's just a smoke screen. Again, the people that dap you doing this only expose their own stupidity.nikkas like you want us all to look like blake griffens son while claiming we're black, which is bytch shyt. you want to fight white supremacy by breeding into it.
if you have a problem with biracials "running from black," how about you stop creating them?
Bruh, I've literally explained how "black" is defined to you 100 times. I think I've even answered this Blake Griffin question before. I know I've explained my position on people like Paula Patton's son. Go back and find it in one of my old posts. You can apply the definition that I've given you to any specific individual that you want to think of.edit: and why you keep ignoring my question? is it "trolling"? what is blake griffen? what is his son? they black just like you, right?
I'm just in awe of how stupid you and the posters who dap your posts are. Just look at what you've said here, you're basically saying that "biracials aren't black regardless of them being classified as black". Anybody who thinks that makes any kind of sense is an idiot.
Except biracials do share our genetics. As AAs we are all mixed to some degree or another. The biracials that you want to exclude from our community are our direct descendants.
Our subjugation to white supremacy in this land has lasted for over 400 years. For over 250 of those years we were literally enslaved. That only ended 150 years ago. After slavery we had Jim Crow which lasted another 100 years or so. During the times of slavery and Jim Crow black men- white women relations were obviously prohibited while white men raped black women with no consequence. So of the 400+ years of our subjugation here, we've only been voluntarily producing biracials for the last 50 or so years. That means that for over 350 years biracial blacks have been a product of black women being raped for the most part. Those biracials were routinely abandoned by the white parent and community and not afforded the privileges that would come with it. Those biracials were absorbed back into the black community and are directly related to us. If you can admit that biracials have always been in our tribe then why do you want to get brand new and kick them out?
This is the kind of corny feminine shyt that you need to let go of bruh. You're only forced to resort to shyt like this because you know understand up on its on. It's just a smoke screen. Again, the people that dap you doing this only expose their own stupidity.
Bruh, I've literally explained how "black" is defined to you 100 times. I think I've even answered this Blake Griffin question before. I know I've explained my position on people like Paula Patton's son. Go back and find it in one of my old posts. You can apply the definition that I've given you to any specific individual that you want to think of.
You think that repeating the same dumb shyt over and over is how you win a debate