How Many Of Ya'll Think Tim Walz Would Be A Better President Than Kamala Harris?

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
42,790
Reputation
3,020
Daps
131,873
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
Hit dogs hollering, like clockwork.


What's the over-under on a strong correlation between a preference for white male leadership and worshiping a cac Jesus :jbhmm: we typically see this in white women but again I'm not surprised to see it from "Black" people. Considering how many effort cacs put into making some of us compliant and all.
You must have me confused with those other posters that you go at it with on a daily basis.

I've made it clear more than once on here that I'm voting for Harris, but I'm not going to sit here and pretend like she's this perfect candidate that everyone liked when we can easily pull receipts on everybody on this site in agreement. Even the media had soured on her as well at one point and time.

The only thing that's essentially changed is that she's now the nominee and it's an all hands on deck situation to beat Trump. Let's keep it really and 100% honest without an of the phoniness that people are doing.
 
Last edited:

Unbothered

ELEVATING to HIGHER LEVELS with POSITIVE VIBES ✨
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
2,129
Reputation
433
Daps
5,245
Reppin
'Cuse, New York
I'm not surprised some of you are more comfortable with white leadership.
Yeah, it's hypocritical how some of the same ones chastising Kamala with the whole “is she or is she not Black” shtick as a reason to not support her but, in turn, would gladly support a white person.

I'm not saying this because of anything against Walz but rather noticing the hypocrisy in some posters.

I can't wait until 2028 or 2032 to see if the same charade on here continues when (nothing against them either) Whitmer, Newsom, etc, who are both white, get into the picture.
 

AngryBaby

All Star
Joined
Oct 13, 2014
Messages
4,176
Reputation
116
Daps
11,482
I’m surprised some of ya’ll charged up for Indian leadership
Is this a productive comment when it comes to making sure maga doesn't win? Which is actually the biggest threat to not just black people but aby marginalized group?

Is this even a productive thread? Black people are looking real stupid right now and like we are our own worst enemies when we do shyt like this.

Contrarianism for the sake of it, instead of being on fukking code.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,005
Reputation
3,755
Daps
105,009
Reppin
Detroit
I'm sure Walz would be fine, but I don't see any inherent reason that he'd be better than Kamala.

Yeah, it's hypocritical how some of the same ones chastising Kamala with the whole “is she or is she not Black” shtick as a reason to not support her but, in turn, would gladly support a white person.

I'm not saying this because of anything against Walz but rather noticing the hypocrisy in some posters.

I can't wait until 2028 or 2032 to see if the same charade on here continues when (nothing against them either) Whitmer, Newsom, etc, who are both white, get into the picture.

Most people saying that are just MAGA and don't want to admit it - don't fall for the bad faith arguments.

In 2028/2032 they'll still make up some reason not to support whoever the Dem is, whether it's Kamala or whoever else.
 

Prince.Skeletor

Don’t Be Like He-Man
Bushed
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
28,754
Reputation
-7,239
Daps
55,730
Reppin
Bucktown
Is this a productive comment when it comes to making sure maga doesn't win? Which is actually the biggest threat to not just black people but aby marginalized group?
This thread is not going to change one mind.
It’s just a discussion.

When was the last time you changed someone’s mind on the internet & their voting decision??

People will support who they decide to whether they read threads or not
 

UpNext

Superstar
Joined
Aug 23, 2019
Messages
4,417
Reputation
910
Daps
16,050
I'm sorry but what is this foolishness?

Breh...

Nvm
Not very complicated, Kamala Harris is a center right prosecutor who ran one of the worst Presidential campaigns of the 21st century (relative to money spent and her results produced). As a VP she served under a milquetoast return to status quo President (Biden), fumbled the biggest assignment she was given (immigration) and had an office that was mired by mass turn over and chaos (described by many long time advisors as one of the worst ran offices they've ever seen).

By all intents and purposes, a terrible candidate. She's only in the position she's in and has the support that she has because she stood next to Biden and is not Trump as she never would have been selected by the people to be here. They could make any Democrat under the age of 65 serving a notable position with a pulse into what Kamala is right now as they are not Trump and would have been endorsed by Biden as well. She doesn't even have to have a basic agenda in writing on her webpage:

Kamala Harris for President

to have the support she has right now. Just don't be Trump and don't look like you have dementia is the bar right now.

Her as a President will more likely than not be status quo. Nobody in life is really going to notice anything but their life getting progressively tougher, everything will continue to get more expensive, wages will continue to stagnate, life will continue to go on.

I'm going to remove the component of Walz likely having to actually won a primary to be in a Presidential position as he wasn't the VP.

Tim Walz is a well-liked center left governor with a proven history of being able to deliver progressive policies in his home state across partisan lines

(Tim Walz works across partisan lines to get students free food and mandatory paid time off for families, Kamala Harris works across party lines to criminalize child truancy , big difference right there).

Within the party I see him get love from progressives to Manchin which shows me he probably is well qualified to get the Democratic party to fall in line in ways Harris (and Biden) probably can't. From what I also read he definitely has a better opportunity at winning support from the right in terms of getting policies pushed through congress.


By all intents and purposes this is the basic outline of someone I'd call a competent candidate who has the likelihood of actually pushing a policy you can point to and say your day to day life actually got better because he was in office. I'd pick him over Biden as well because I know these folks:


have that problem that causes them to read things that aren't there. You can see it heavy in this thread already.
 
Last edited:
Top