Unfortunately, I mentioned Julia came out a couple months after the Kerner Report which studied the riots in the 60s and I made an explicit point to draw that parallel to Kamala Harris' vice presidency. There was nothing fallacious about my post, your flagrant use of a strawman on the other hand. Because you don't know this information, it doesn't mean I'm being fallacious.
Since you have the time, here are my sources:
Some other sources:
The above image is the Kerner Commission responsible for the report of the same name, Roy Wilkins is the first man on the left sitting down. Hal Kanter said he spoke to Roy Wilkins, the timeline matches.
Diahann Carroll about Julia in her own words:
I got more, but I ain't got time tonight.
I'm in favor of black people not working against their interests by siding with people who are using them.
Because that's how laws work. People violate them and then get taken to court. It's like asking why a drug trade exists if drugs are illegal.
Are you disputing that California was a Free State, or that there was a categorical difference between Free States and Slave States? Because it was sort of the overriding political issue of U.S. history at that point in time and the only issue that has led the country into Civil War, so a lot of folk black and white both would be pretty shocked if you're trying to claim there's no difference.
All this. Just a starting point but we needed a starting point. Getting it in any state is good but a big notable one like California is especially good. California actually has the 5th-largest Black population in the USA by numbers, but the fact that it doesn't have its own legacy of Black slavery is gonna be a factor of course.
I disputed the fact you claimed that California does not have a legacy of Black Slavery and I posted evidence that California does have a legacy of slavery and that there were Black Slaves who were forced to do labor in California, and California was fine with slavery and it shows that California was complicit in slavery of FBA/Freedman and how California owes FBA/Freeman reparations.
An actual supporter wouldn't view this as creating division, but as addressing a problem that has to be fixed. Look at this:
I've never argued that California shouldn't pay reparations. I've praised this task force from the beginning.
But it obviously doesn't have the same impact in a Free State as it would in a Slave State.
That's not controversial anywhere breh, sometimes I think you just talk to hear yourself talk. Go find a Trump rally to defend, since you claimed you prefer him to Democrats anyway.
When they start cutting them checks and it’s time for me to abandon Caribbean culture and claim my ADOS side.
There's a Twitter space on the new California law:
That's a powerful statement, Breh. If we can direct change with that small of a percentage, imagine what we can accomplish now that more of us are starting to get on code nationwide.It's crazy that the Black population in California is 6.5% and that 6.5% includes immigrant Black people and FBA/Freedman, which makes the FBA/Freedman population of California less than 6.5%, but with that small percentage we (FBA/Freedman) are able to make things move.
Newsome allegedly said he wasn’t gonna run this cycle.
I wouldn’t bank on that.
ironically Tariq will probably try to find a problem with this and try to nitpick and hyperfocus on any flaws he can find