Jokic himself isn't the damning factor.
Except he is, because he's been one of the league-leaders in plus-minus for years now, when the likes of Gordon, MPJ, KCP etc haven't even been on the team.
Its the teammates all being net rating leaders. Are those guys lying about how the coach manages the reserves? Are the Nuggets a championship caliber squad? Are those players all top 5 at their positions? If not then the logic is pretty cut and dry & the numbers make perfect sense in that context.
It's because they're in lineups with Jokic, and they're above-average quality starters.
Jokic was missing his #2 and #3 options last season, and yet he still had the 7th highest plus/minus in the league playing with a lottery support cast - no other Denver player was in the #20. Whereas Boston had four players, PHX had three, Milwaukee had two, Memphis had three etc. He's the best playmaker/offensive centerpiece in the league and it's the reason why all the players that play in the lineups he's in end up having such a high plus/minus.
No greater indication than this -
Apart from Murray, these guys struggle to score effectively without Jokic on the floor.
That person who wrote that is a Giannis apologist and is blatantly manipulating the stats to tell a story that isn't reflective of reality.
If those players weren't making top-10 net ratings on other teams then that would be helping prove the point. The system they're running has the starters always playing at full strength compared to the more rotational play of other teams
It's not the system - it's Jokic.
The starting 5 for Denver aren't even in the top-5 for most-played minutes in the league. In fact, if you compare the Denver starting 5 (only 471 minutes) and compare them to the Kings starting 5 (732 minutes), you'll see that their starters playing together pale in comparison to the amount of time that the Kings starters do.