1) Pregnancy is not only from fukking strictly without protection whether bc or condom.
2) my point is a woman can be pregnant while on a "false period" or during the dissolving of the other egg. That will not provide accurate results
3)So that literally means it does matter what tempo her period is on.
4) pregnancy test can't literally see the baby inside of you. The test for chemicals being released to "show pregnancy" with that being said if your hormones are out of wack, your taking certain medications during the test etc can give a false positive and negative.
These factors are not rare but common. The earliest you can determine a heart beat is a couple weeks in. Which leaves there abortion time between 2-3 weeks after pregnancy, in addition to actually being far enough from your initial period till your next possible missed one which could be 30 days post pregnancy to even notice.
You don't know what you're talking about bro. And I only know because of a 5 yr relationship with a woman who had reproductive issues.
I've already said that a couple of months is around the timeframe I start to have an "opinion" about this.
2 weeks is too soon of a cutoff
I've been counting periods and dealing with irregular periods for years at a pop with multiple women over my 30 years of chasing and cuffing women.
You're tying to say there's no reasonable way to manage this to where you know and decide what you're gonna do in the first couple of months. I call bullshyt. If your scenario is rare, then maybe that kind of person is more observant of their bodies, but if 90% of women are not that way, then you have to look at it from the perspective of the average.
Whatever you say, I say this is serious and these "unborn fetuses" deserve that much respect. Even if you want to abort, I think you have to be respectful enough to do it early "enough"... we can tease out the details of what that means down to a number of weeks, but there is a point at which it becomes the height of macabre