Frederick Douglass Isn't Black

BmoreGorilla

Veteran
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
38,661
Reputation
29,757
Daps
250,723
Reppin
Man, woman, and child
Your mom and dad are mixed, so are your grand parents and their grandparents.


Only pure nikkas to ever live in this land were the ones who got off the Boat
According to the coli tho its very possible. Lets say you had a kid with a mixed girl. With a black dad tho :whoa:

The this kid has a kid with a black person and that kid has a kid with a black person after a few generations the gene pool has become "undiluted".

The family bloodline is back to 100% Black :ahh:

According to some tho someone who is 50/50 isn't either or. But if its 51% black and 49% white the person is black and vice versa. :pachaha:

Straight up you could make a tough ass algebraic word problem outta all this shyt :patrice:
 

Spatial Paradox

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
2,290
Reputation
1,120
Daps
12,145
Reppin
Brooklyn
1. Well we could say that between 50% and 60% means they can still be considered just biracial here in the US to reflect the fact that most of us AAs arent 100% black either.

What I was getting at was you're not even being consistent with who's what. And if you're going to be on a racial purity tip, you need a clear dividing line, not the inconsistent standard you've continually stood behind

2. Its not how things are though for those who do not subscribe to that view.

Hmmm, interesting. Sounds fine to just take whatever view you wish if you live in a social vacuum.

Race is a social classification that isn't based on science or genetics. Why can't you understand that? You're a fukking idiot, that's why.

Your personal opinion of what they are doesn't mean anything. They're classified, seen, and treated as black in the world that we live in. That's all race is, how people classify and treat you based on the color of your skin(phenotypical traits).

Tone aside, this is what it comes down to, whether you subscribe to that view or not. It's really not based on science or genetic (because if it were, we'd have to have a lot more categories than we do now), but on how society sees you and treats you based on physical appearance
 
Last edited:

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,992
Reputation
8,135
Daps
98,609
What I was getting at was you're not even being consistent with who's what. And if you're going to be on a racial purity tip, you need a clear dividing line, not the inconsistent standard you've continually stood behind

Hmmm, interesting. Sounds fine to just take whatever view you wish if you live in a social vacuum.
1. There is no lack of consistency. 60% and up makes you that race is how i view it. We arent even talking about purity since most of us AAs are mixed with a bit of something.

2. Is detaching your mind from racist whites foreign to you? All up under them for everything. Let that titty go bro.
 

Kuwka_Atcha_Ratcha

Superstar
Joined
Jul 17, 2012
Messages
13,684
Reputation
-4,185
Daps
16,493
Reppin
NULL
1. There is no lack of consistency. 60% and up makes you that race is how i view it. We arent even talking about purity since most of us AAs are mixed with a bit of something.

2. Is detaching your mind from racist whites foreign to you? All up under them for everything. Let that titty go bro.
why are you rounding race to the nearest ten
 

GreatestLaker

#FirePelinka
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,161
Reputation
980
Daps
44,228
1. There is no lack of consistency. 60% and up makes you that race is how i view it. We arent even talking about purity since most of us AAs are mixed with a bit of something.

2. Is detaching your mind from racist whites foreign to you? All up under them for everything. Let that titty go bro.
If we were to go by that rule then pretty much every single American mulatto is white. Since the average American mulatto is around 60% white.
 

Spatial Paradox

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
2,290
Reputation
1,120
Daps
12,145
Reppin
Brooklyn
1. There is no lack of consistency. 60% and up makes you that race. We arent even talking about purity since most of us AAs are mixed.

There is. According to you, a black person and a white person can have a white child. Or vice-versa. If that's the case, you either have a pointlessly narrow definition of being biracial vs. black/white or your stance is inconsistent

And how are we not talking about "purity"? This whole topic is about whether biracial/mixed people should be considered "black", never mind what those individuals actually see themselves as and how society sees them

2. Is detaching your mind from racist whites foreign to you? All up under them for everything. Let that titty go bro.

:pachaha:

You know what, I'll bite. What is the above supposed to even mean?


Cuz he is arguing just to argue and I think its funny entertaining him.

And your stance is so hopelessly confused and inconsistent and you don't even realize it. Which I find pretty entertaining :troll:
 
Top