No its scary how much YOU THINK that sites sphere of influence is
Former Chiefs RB Larry Johnson Goes Off About LGBT Illuminatti; Update: Works For Infowars Now
- Thread starter DonKnock
- Start date
DonKnock
KPJ Gonna Save Us
Yeah, high-ranking masons are forcing Kerr to have his guys shoot more threes and telling Westbrook what he has to wear on the way to the team bus.
Wearing pink for breast cancer awareness month (which ended two years ago) was a secret Illuminati plot to promote the gay agenda.
Thunder coaches can’t even get through to Westbrook to change his play style on the court, but the Freemasons subliminal messages have bent him to their will
Seum is fast food sports talk. These nikkas are mostly retarded dawgYeah, high-ranking masons are forcing Kerr to have his guys shoot more threes and telling Westbrook what he has to wear on the way to the team bus.
Wearing pink for breast cancer awareness month (which ended two years ago) was a secret Illuminati plot to promote the gay agenda.
THE MACHINE
night owl
Cant believe how many people are completely against what he's saying 
Are there some shaky parts to his rant? Yes. But most of it seems to be spot on.
Are there some shaky parts to his rant? Yes. But most of it seems to be spot on.Yeah, high-ranking masons are forcing Kerr to have his guys shoot more threes and telling Westbrook what he has to wear on the way to the team bus.
Wearing pink for breast cancer awareness month (which ended two years ago) was a secret Illuminati plot to promote the gay agenda.
I think the overall point is the lack of testosterone in today's NBA game....
The "soul" has been taken out and nikkas have been neutered...
Its bigger than the coaches..they gotta adapt...
This nikka really might be on to something when you think about it...
Thunder coaches can’t even get through to Westbrook to change his play style on the court, but the Freemasons subliminal messages have bent him to their will
And yet right below y'all are fools saying, "Yeah a bit of it is confused but most of what he said is on point!"
Let's look at literally every single thing he said:
So the basic theory from the beginning is that the "masons" who run NFL/NBA would risk hundreds of billions of dollars in their established ultramasculine fan base out of the faint possibility that some of the 1% of gay folk in America are gonna spend ANY of their money on basketball and football.
Y'all don't see how stupid that is from the start? Gay folk spending a bunch of money on basketball football? You really see that happening? Enough money that it overrides the VASTLY more money that could be lost from the negative pushback to gay folk being catered to?
Two sports with gigantic homophobic fan bases ain't gonna fukk that up in order to cater to a bunch of LGBT fools who don't even like their sports anyway.
So...who is telling Westbrook to wear that shyt? And somehow Westbrook wearing that shyt is leading to gay folk rocking a bunch of Westbrook gear?
The 3pt is a gay shot? Analytics is gay? When coaches realized that 3 points are more than 2 it wasn't because teams that could hit threes were winning games, it was to attract a gay fan base?
This entire theory is that gay folk like three-pointers more than rough physical play....why? Why is that even an assumption that gay folk don't want to watch men being physical?
Who da fukk is fitting the "feminine archetype" in the NFL/NBA?
Players aren't working out as much? Gay people don't work out? Gay people don't like guys with muscles? I'm really scratching my head on this one.
The SEC somehow rigged it that Sam would get 12 sacks and 19 tackles for a loss his senior year? How exactly did they plan that? Or is it that they "planned" that the hometown team would take a flier on picking the SEC Defensive Player of the Year with damn near the last pick in the draft? They planned that 32 defensive ends would get taken before him? They planned that he would get cut after the preseason and never play a single NFL game?
Someone tell me which part of that exactly was part of some dastardly plot to attract gay folk.
Wait, they didn't buy a cupcake franchise to make money? They bought it on orders to promote the gay agenda? Cupcakes are gay now? Real football players only own "masculine" businesses?
How a player reacts to something is now controlled by the Illuminati, and any player who has drama over anything is actually the gay agenda.
Exactly how did the illuminati send their message? And wouldn't his entire Twitter thread fit into the category of "feminine behavior" itself?
The whole wearing pink ribbons thing mostly ended two years ago (teams diversified into other cancers now), and supporting breast cancer awareness was somehow going to sneak-attract gay people to the NFL?
And, "the NFL sweeps domestic violence under the rug therefore breast cancer awareness month must be gay" has got to be one of the BIGGEST logical reaches I've seen even for a conspiracy theorist. Y'all realize that doesn't make any sense, there's no connection there, right?
Every point he made was dumb when you look at it. Literally every one. And you are dumb if you agree with any of it.
I hope you're trolling.I think the overall point is the lack of testosterone in today's NBA game....
The "soul" has been taken out and nikkas have been neutered...
Its bigger than the coaches..they gotta adapt...
This nikka really might be on to something when you think about it...
You think the NBA has attracted a bunch of new gay fans? The NFL/NBA, during a time of immense popularity and profit, are on a mission to alienate their traditional fan base on the slight hope that the far smaller gay market will suddenly invest enormous amounts of money in sports they don't give a shyt about? You do realize that would be the stupidest business decision in history, right?
And which coaches would purposely avoid winning games, purposely try not to try successful "high testosterone" strategies, in order to follow some sort of vague orders to shoot more threes? Did Memphis not get the memo, did they not have to follow everyone else's rules?
It wasn't that late-90s/early-00s iso-ball was boring. It wasn't that fans hated 87-79 final scores. It wasn't that teams like the Knicks and the Nets were ugly as fukk as Finals teams. No, it was the gay agenda.
Coli has gone full retard on this one here.
Eccentric fashion is the only thing I can even see bringing in an LGBT audience.
Although we all know its not
3pt shooting and weight loss
Lemme find out one of yall was in that Zion is getting fat thread telling that nikka to hit to gym.
We'll see who the freemasons are
Eccentric fashion is the only thing I can even see bringing in an LGBT audience.
Although we all know its not
3pt shooting and weight loss
Lemme find out one of yall was in that Zion is getting fat thread telling that nikka to hit to gym.
We'll see who the freemasons are
Propaganda
Superstar
these type of threads honestly make me kind of sad for the future.
i hope it's just a phase for you guys cuz some of y'all are so far gone you'll believe anything no matter how fukking stupid it is, as long as it sounds like some kind of nefarious conspiracy.
please be better than this.
i hope it's just a phase for you guys cuz some of y'all are so far gone you'll believe anything no matter how fukking stupid it is, as long as it sounds like some kind of nefarious conspiracy.
please be better than this.
Crack Daniels
Under New Management
Someone help me understand...what is the actual goal of the “gay agenda”?
these type of threads honestly make me kind of sad for the future.
i hope it's just a phase for you guys cuz some of y'all are so far gone you'll believe anything no matter how fukking stupid it is, as long as it sounds like some kind of nefarious conspiracy.
please be better than this.
Yet you are the person who denies everything that is exposed in your face. Let bread and circus run your thought process.
And yet right below y'all are fools saying, "Yeah a bit of it is confused but most of what he said is on point!"
Let's look at literally every single thing he said:
So the basic theory from the beginning is that the "masons" who run NFL/NBA would risk hundreds of billions of dollars in their established ultramasculine fan base out of the faint possibility that some of the 1% of gay folk in America are gonna spend ANY of their money on basketball and football.
Y'all don't see how stupid that is from the start? Gay folk spending a bunch of money on basketball football? You really see that happening? Enough money that it overrides the VASTLY more money that could be lost from the negative pushback to gay folk being catered to?
Two sports with gigantic homophobic fan bases ain't gonna fukk that up in order to cater to a bunch of LGBT fools who don't even like their sports anyway.
So...who is telling Westbrook to wear that shyt? And somehow Westbrook wearing that shyt is leading to gay folk rocking a bunch of Westbrook gear?
The 3pt is a gay shot? Analytics is gay? When coaches realized that 3 points are more than 2 it wasn't because teams that could hit threes were winning games, it was to attract a gay fan base?
This entire theory is that gay folk like three-pointers more than rough physical play....why? Why is that even an assumption that gay folk don't want to watch men being physical?
Who da fukk is fitting the "feminine archetype" in the NFL/NBA?
Players aren't working out as much? Gay people don't work out? Gay people don't like guys with muscles? I'm really scratching my head on this one.
The SEC somehow rigged it that Sam would get 12 sacks and 19 tackles for a loss his senior year? How exactly did they plan that? Or is it that they "planned" that the hometown team would take a flier on picking the SEC Defensive Player of the Year with damn near the last pick in the draft? They planned that 32 defensive ends would get taken before him? They planned that he would get cut after the preseason and never play a single NFL game?
Someone tell me which part of that exactly was part of some dastardly plot to attract gay folk.
Wait, they didn't buy a cupcake franchise to make money? They bought it on orders to promote the gay agenda? Cupcakes are gay now? Real football players only own "masculine" businesses?
How a player reacts to something is now controlled by the Illuminati, and any player who has drama over anything is actually the gay agenda.
Exactly how did the illuminati send their message? And wouldn't his entire Twitter thread fit into the category of "feminine behavior" itself?
The whole wearing pink ribbons thing mostly ended two years ago (teams diversified into other cancers now), and supporting breast cancer awareness was somehow going to sneak-attract gay people to the NFL?
And, "the NFL sweeps domestic violence under the rug therefore breast cancer awareness month must be gay" has got to be one of the BIGGEST logical reaches I've seen even for a conspiracy theorist. Y'all realize that doesn't make any sense, there's no connection there, right?
Every point he made was dumb when you look at it. Literally every one. And you are dumb if you agree with any of it.
All this and still don't get it. You Kats don't really understand how things work in sports at all.
I agree...
