First Amazing Spider-Man 2 Reviews In :lupe:

Jimmy ValenTime

A really good Lawyer
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
6,338
Reputation
1,490
Daps
13,954
Reppin
The Bronx
We dodged a bullet by them cutting the Mary Jane scenes because we were spared from having a bland, lump of a woman like Shailene Woodley in the role.
Now they can recast the part with a chick that is actually attractive like Deborah Ann Woll from True Blood.
MH1BYuF.png


barney-yes.gif



Good pick bruh...

there this strip club in willaims burg and the girl looked EXACTLY like that and i asked her her stripper name and she said Mary Jane and

i was like :dahell: "like the comic books?!??!" and she said "no like the steve madden shoes":troll:
 

flo

All Star
Joined
Jan 30, 2013
Messages
3,136
Reputation
230
Daps
7,999
Reppin
NULL
Only thing we can hope for is that ASM2 is a huge bomb. I mean HUGE bomb. Like 200-300 mil below expectations type bomb.

Then MAYBE Sony would consider selling the rights back.

But even then what the fukk could Marvel do with it? Reboot Spidey AGAIN?????

They would more likely give the reigns back to Raimi again (beg for forgiveness first) and continue where he left off than sell it back to Marvel.
 

Dillah810

Flat Girther
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
40,970
Reputation
9,430
Daps
162,055
Reppin
Flint, Michigan
I saw that and was going to watch but then I didn't. Cliff notes or something because while I'm curious, I also have no real interest in watching what some sanctimonious fan thinks when I'd much rather get thoughts and opinions from the coli brehs.
Basically he says the reason why the DOFP is better than ASM2 (but also says this applies to all X-Men movies sans Last Stand and Orgins), despite the fact that ASM2 is more faithful to the source material, is because the X-movies have a singular focus while ASM2 is all other the place. Also voices his displeasure that Spiderman movies kinda have the same narrative while the X-movies takes you to different places within their narrative.

 

Bruce Wayne

THE GODDAMN BILLIONAIRE
Joined
Sep 5, 2012
Messages
13,718
Reputation
2,500
Daps
32,879
Reppin
Gotham City
We dodged a bullet by them cutting the Mary Jane scenes because we were spared from having a bland, lump of a woman like Shailene Woodley in the role.
Now they can recast the part with a chick that is actually attractive like Deborah Ann Woll from True Blood.
MH1BYuF.png
Don't forget the fact that Shailene Woodley looks too much like Andrew Garfield.
3eec4d22-d328-4666-922e-01167e4b4434_comiccon_spiderman_andrew630.jpg
 

Killer Instinct

To live in hearts we leave behind is to never die.
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
33,351
Reputation
11,811
Daps
153,431
Reppin
LWO
I saw this a little more than a week or so ago and was disappointed. Wasn't as good as the first and I thought they could have narrowed the plot and made the story more cohesive by omitting Electro in this one. Second half was better than the first and the clock tower scene was well done. Other than that, film was lackluster.
 

Mook

We should all strive to be like Mr. Rogers.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
22,402
Reputation
2,322
Daps
57,070
Reppin
Raleigh
Just saw it, I see I got a lot of more morons I gotta add to the list.

Lol @ garfield being a bad Peter Parker. You losers dont even know who peter parker is.

Movie was dope except for Harry Osborn and fukking with spiderman story period. <---might be an oxymoron lol.

They killed Norman off the bat, thats like killing the joker in a batman series :dwillhuh:

Harry turning into green goblin was :what: after peters dad said only his blood works. Who wrote this shyt?

These nikkas make no sense, like b. Theres fukking 50 years of books, just take it word for word from it :snoop:

Harry Osbron casting might be worst than the kirsten dunst. They should really just make a reboot of THIS one and go like this shyt never happened :mjlol: keep the first and go on from there :pachaha:
 

stepbackj34spud

Top 75 All-Time
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
30,855
Reputation
-5,525
Daps
61,703
Reppin
BK
Worst spiderman movie I've ever seen. Other than the upcoming Avengers and Superman/Batman flick, I'm done with Super hero movies. I'm not even surprised how bad these movies are anymore.
 

King Crimson

Member of a very exclusive gang
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
15,264
Reputation
2,285
Daps
29,959
Reppin
Bk/NY
Just saw it, I see I got a lot of more morons I gotta add to the list.

Lol @ garfield being a bad Peter Parker. You losers dont even know who peter parker is.

Movie was dope except for Harry Osborn and fukking with spiderman story period. <---might be an oxymoron lol.

They killed Norman off the bat, thats like killing the joker in a batman series :dwillhuh:

Harry turning into green goblin was :what: after peters dad said only his blood works. Who wrote this shyt?

These nikkas make no sense, like b. Theres fukking 50 years of books, just take it word for word from it :snoop:

Harry Osbron casting might be worst than the kirsten dunst. They should really just make a reboot of THIS one and go like this shyt never happened :mjlol: keep the first and go on from there :pachaha:
I think that was the point though. If Harry had Parker blood then I think he would've been cured and not turned into the Goblin... Another thing is, and I might be alone in this, but I don't think Norman is really dead... I refuse to believe that we'll get a Spiderman with no Norman Osborn. I think it's more likely that we'll see the inverse of the Raimi films. Where as Norman was Goblin before Harry, I think that in this one, we'll see Harry as Goblin then Norman... At least I hope we see Norman Goblin.
 
Top