Do black women and white men couples..

[godkiller]

They criticized white women with generalizations, I proved my point.

This was not your point. Plus, generalizing about feminism as it relates to women isn't a "takedown". It's feminist ranting. Anyway, this was your original point:

You said: "I mean just last week I was on a majority white forum
where dozens of posters were gushing about their attraction
tp black women and what accompanied this was some pretty blatant
disparaging of white women."


1) there was no gushing about attraction.

2) the crux of some criticisms were of feminism and Western society in general. They weren't "takedowns"; you posted 4 examples of general feminist hating. There was no attack on white female beauty, body, etc. It's about feminism.

3) meanwhile I posted 10 examples (there was more) of the cacs, ironically, disparaging black women as being easy when you're white (and as much saying so). This is the basis of the entire bb.com thread, and the foundation from which the the bb.com OP beganthe thread after being rejected by 4 white girls and rebounding on an easy black girl. That's what opened his eyes to "black girls might be easy", anyone else think so". then the parade of responses "yah yah" come

4) on the final page, one bb.com poster basically summarizes the thread as being: " in a thread where white miscers are spouting their typical vitriol of ''black women are easy for us, they want to assimilate!''. so, ironically, the thread isn't praise but rather insult as that poster sees it and supposedly has seen it before since he implies the vitriol is "typical". The poster implies this is a typical bb.com belief which suggests that black girls being easy came up in another thread and got traction.

all this aside, you're a poster that attacks affirmative action and uses the term "miscer". prolly wasn't a coincidence u were thereabouts around bb.com, which explains why you're misrepresenting things in general

And your personal opinion on what constitutes an insult or an ignorant
generalization doesn't factor into that.
I'm done with it

My opinion is as valid as my ability to substantiate it. If I can prove 2+2 =4 then my opinion is as strong as any fact. In any factual case, there is a right and a wrong answer. So one of us is overstating the case, and given your 4 crappy examples and my 10 examples--including the bb.com user himself--I think I win. It is what it is: since I argued in this thread about delusion, I have to finish or else I lose creditability. My skrong posting has already risen my value

 

[mariahcooper]

Not true as per convention; black men are more variable and rank black women higher than average other groups on average, as the OKCupid study shows. Even though the black men on OKCupid don't represent the average nikka and probably only represent nerds and geeks (as most BM don't like Asian women like that), these black men still respond to black women messages at higher rates than cacs, Asians and Hispanics. So there you have it, facts. Any that criticize black men without criticizing cacs, Asians and Hispanics as being worse is a true delusional clown. If you're going to say, "I won't talk to groups of men that hate me!", any honest person would start with non-blacks before they get to blacks

well i really dont care about any of that, as long as im getting mine. I get hit on by all different races, and the black women i know do also. You keep pointing out these stats but they dont correlate with real life for me. and a lot of black women get hit on by hispanic and white men more than black men, so they date whos approaching them. either way you're just being the typical angry black male trying to convince black women not to date out.

stay mad

 

[mariahcooper]

No they didn't. The thread veered but they didn't criticize one white woman physically or otherwise. Some criticized feminism and attached it to haughty western white women. Others said talking to white women was harder than black women (with the subtle and open implication the latter are easier). That's as far as the "derogatory views" went.



Several? You posted four examples and they don't even down white women or say necessarily that they like black girls (there were some but you don't post them). The examples you give are tirades aimed at feminism using white women as examples. The thread opener post is basically a "black girls are easy" rant and you don't even realize it. The OP says:

"i did approach other girls, but i found out that white girls tend to have their defense shields up in clubs. Eventually saw that same white girl make out with a 6'2 super good looking guy. I approached maybe 2-3 HBB blondes but no go, they either told me "would you please go away i have a boyfriend" or they would point at a random direction and say "hey tha'ts my boyfriend over there and he wouldn't like it if you talk to me

whereas, i approached like 2 black chicks and 1 of them came with the boyfriend. I even introduced myself and he was chill as fuk, and was focused on having fun."

^^^^

So basically the bb.com OP went after 4 white women first, was rejected each and every time, rebounded on some black women and had easy success. And Ttat's what the thread is about. It's about how easy the black women was after bruh was rejected by white girls like four times in a row


----


Then the other posters chip in with their opinions (first page) saying black girls are easy if you're white (ergo, black women are sellouts, exactly as the OKCupid model predicts. Funny how science works?):

"The few times I've been cold approached by women they have been black chicks."

"can confirm. (live in south fl). if ur white looking and decent looking and u strike up a convo with a black chick it almost always goes smoothly"

"Can confirm black girls are easier to talk to than white chicks."

"because your white op. every girl wants to assimilate."

"When black people are friendly, they're VERY friendly. And why do you act so surprised? White women are up themselves a bit too much these days. A man they don't know has somehow become a rapist."

"go to the south and then report back"

"funny because i hear that black chicks get hit on all the time because black dudes approach a lot

but then, when i approach them, they are nice and chill as fuk. I would think they have a high defense shield because they got hit on so much but they are pretty chill. They even want to get to know you like "so where you from" "what's your name"

"Yes, its actually a bad thing because a lot of times, black females end up settling for deadbeat type black guys so if a professional looking white guy comes along, they might be responsive to it."

"Can confirm /10"






This is a stretch. It's anti-feminism talk. Let's review what you posted here:


bb.com:
"Because they aren't all full of that bull shyt neo feminazi crap
"You're raping me with your eyes!"

OP I've always agreed there is less hostility to break through when you go to talk to a black girl compared to a white girl."

^
This is a takedown of feminism, not white women. The guy even implies that black women are easier than white girls, just like I and the other bb.com poster summarized the thread as being.

bb.com:
"Maybe it has something to do with #Yesallwoman which comprises mostly of white woman claiming that men rape them. BTW

Fun fact:

"1 in 4 women have been raped" began with the study by Mary Koss et al, that was published in 1987 in Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. Her methodology has been critiqued quite a bit...she misconstrues a state definition of rape and uses vaguely worded questions in order to elicit positive responses. In effect...if ever you had sex and later regretted it, or felt you had been tricked (i.e. someone told you they loved you but were lying)...that counted as rape. "

So in the 1 in 4 woman are raped statistics. Rape includes if ever a woman had sex and later regretted it, and if someone had told a woman they loved them but were lying.

This is again a takedown of feminism, using rape as a weapon, feminists, etc using white women as props. Not a "takedown" of white women.



This was just a general continuation of the feminist thing.



This is just saying white girls are harder than black girls and black girls are easy. Also, estrogen is the feminine hormone. Where's the takedown?





You argue against affirmative action and call bb.com users "miscers". you're probably a cac

You also ignored the men in that thread who said black women dont put them on a pedestal like asian women do and aren't that easy to get. someone also brought up a stat in the thread saying black women are the only race that dont prefer white men the most. if thats the case then why do black men put other races on a pedestal when they consider them a last option also? Black men obv will take any ugly non black woman they can get i see it all the time, black women in interracial relationships have much better taste.

 

[-----]

[QUOTE="GiGi, post: 9505588, member: 16775"]Many black men do not view dark skinned or brown skinned black women as a prize or as the epitome of beauty. So when another race of man finds these black women attractive it is greeted with disbelief or skepticism. Do most white men like/want black women? Not necessarily. But there are a LOT who do.[/QUOTE]



Stop playin' yourself.

 

[-----]

I know a black man off the top of my head that talks about dating white women in every video and his whole channel is dedicated to traveling over seas to meet white women. Again this isn't exclusive to black women you're seeing what you want to see.

I don't believe you.

 

[godkiller]

You also ignored the men in that thread who said black women dont put them on a pedestal like asian women do and aren't that easy to get.

It's clear at this point you lack basic reading comprehension and analysis skills. The only posters in the thread that talk about pedestals are 1) black bb.com posters (wallace, stuntindojos, etc) and 2)that one poster who said that bw aren't on pedestals and so don't feel wanted (therefore they are easy). That's it. You got this wrong like you got the OKCupid analysis wrong; you are not smart and I tire of saying it. This is my final post.

someone also brought up a stat in the thread saying black women are the only race that dont prefer white men the most. if thats the case then why do black men put other races on a pedestal when they consider them a last option also?

them cacs have a white supremacist bias to everything. if it's not them on top of the world, they can't believe it. black men are variously ranked as the most masculine and physically attractive men, higher than cacs even, all else equal. that aside, men do not consider women's opinions that much. it's sexism but it's true. women don't run shyt

Black men obv will take any ugly non black woman they can get i see it all the time, black women in interracial relationships have much better taste.

a cac is a cac.

 

[filial_piety]

There's an interesting tidbit here....Children produced by Black Women/White Men tend to have lower IQ scores than children produced by Black Men/White Women...approximately 11 points lower.......this might explain why a white woman and black male couples have been able to produce a "Barack Obama" while 400 years of Black woman procreation with white men hasn't been able to...just a thought.

"Lee Willerman and his colleagues compared children with a black mother and a white father to children with a white mother and a black father. The cleanest comparison is for mixed-race children who lived only with their mother. Mixed-race children who lived with a white mother scored 11 points higher than mixed-race children who lived with a black mother. Since the black-white IQ gap averaged about 15 points at the time these two studies were done, they imply that about four-fifths of that gap was traceable to family-related factors (including schools and neighborhoods)"

http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/j/jencks-gap.html

I'm not spreading propaganda though......but it's an interesting caveat...

 

[godkiller]

There's an interesting tidbit here....Children produced by Black Women/White Men tend to have lower IQ scores than children produced by Black Men/White Women...approximately 11 points lower.......this might explain why a white woman and black male couples have been able to produce a "Barack Obama" while 400 years of Black woman procreation with white men hasn't been able to...just a thought.

"Lee Willerman and his colleagues compared children with a black mother and a white father to children with a white mother and a black father. The cleanest comparison is for mixed-race children who lived only with their mother. Mixed-race children who lived with a white mother scored 11 points higher than mixed-race children who lived with a black mother. Since the black-white IQ gap averaged about 15 points at the time these two studies were done, they imply that about four-fifths of that gap was traceable to family-related factors (including schools and neighborhoods)"

http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/j/jencks-gap.html

I'm not spreading propaganda though......but it's an interesting caveat...

This has nothing to do with anything and I highly doubt it's due to genetics. Mulattos are genetically the same and score between their racial heritage scores.

 

[filial_piety]

This has nothing to do with anything and I highly doubt it's due to genetics. Mulattos are genetically the same and score between their racial heritage scores.

Sure it does....it provides another angle to this whole BW/WM, BM/WW dynamic. I'm not sure whether what you "highly doubt" matters here (nothing personal)...the study says otherwise.

 

[TMNT4000]

It's clear at this point you lack basic reading comprehension and analysis skills. The only posters in the thread that talk about pedestals are 1) black bb.com posters (wallace, stuntindojos, etc) and 2)that one poster who said that bw aren't on pedestals and so don't feel wanted (therefore they are easy). That's it. You got this wrong like you got the OKCupid analysis wrong; you are not smart and I tire of saying it. This is my final post.



them cacs have a white supremacist bias to everything. if it's not them on top of the world, they can't believe it. black men are variously ranked as the most masculine and physically attractive men, higher than cacs even, all else equal. that aside, men do not consider women's opinions that much. it's sexism but it's true. women don't run shyt



a cac is a cac.

Link?

 

[Killer Instinct]

There's an interesting tidbit here....Children produced by Black Women/White Men tend to have lower IQ scores than children produced by Black Men/White Women...approximately 11 points lower.......this might explain why a white woman and black male couples have been able to produce a "Barack Obama" while 400 years of Black woman procreation with white men hasn't been able to...just a thought.

"Lee Willerman and his colleagues compared children with a black mother and a white father to children with a white mother and a black father. The cleanest comparison is for mixed-race children who lived only with their mother. Mixed-race children who lived with a white mother scored 11 points higher than mixed-race children who lived with a black mother. Since the black-white IQ gap averaged about 15 points at the time these two studies were done, they imply that about four-fifths of that gap was traceable to family-related factors (including schools and neighborhoods)"

http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/j/jencks-gap.html

I'm not spreading propaganda though......but it's an interesting caveat...

 

[GiGi]

There's an interesting tidbit here....Children produced by Black Women/White Men tend to have lower IQ scores than children produced by Black Men/White Women...approximately 11 points lower.......this might explain why a white woman and black male couples have been able to produce a "Barack Obama" while 400 years of Black woman procreation with white men hasn't been able to...just a thought.

"Lee Willerman and his colleagues compared children with a black mother and a white father to children with a white mother and a black father. The cleanest comparison is for mixed-race children who lived only with their mother. Mixed-race children who lived with a white mother scored 11 points higher than mixed-race children who lived with a black mother. Since the black-white IQ gap averaged about 15 points at the time these two studies were done, they imply that about four-fifths of that gap was traceable to family-related factors (including schools and neighborhoods)"

http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/j/jencks-gap.html

I'm not spreading propaganda though......but it's an interesting caveat...

Why wouldn't those stats make sense? White women even ones with biracial children still have access to their white privilege. Black women do not.


Barack Obama was raised by his white mother, white grandmother, white grandfather and Asian stepfather....after being abandoned by his BLACK father. But that's just a thought.

 

[filial_piety]

Barack Obama was raised by his white mother, white grandmother, white grandfather and Asian stepfather....after being abandoned by his BLACK father. But that's just a thought.

We all know that......but it still doesn't explain why they produce children with 11 IQ points higher

Again...not advocating ...just wondering...

 

[GiGi]

We all know that......but it still doesn't explain why they produce children with 11 IQ points higher

Again...not advocating ...just wondering...

Well let's hear YOUR thoughts on it

 

[filial_piety]

Well let's hear YOUR thoughts on it

Your guess is as good as mines.