skyrunner1
Superstar
I think Diageo requested..Why is a federal magistrate judge assigned to a state case? That is a new York city specific law not a federal law case. Shouldn't it be a municipal judge?
I think Diageo requested..Why is a federal magistrate judge assigned to a state case? That is a new York city specific law not a federal law case. Shouldn't it be a municipal judge?
Again. The media convinced people this was normal. Movies too.
2423 makes it a federal felony punishable by up to 30 years to travel across state lines, into the United States, or even to a foreign country (if that person is a U.S. citizen or permanent resident) for the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual conduct... He's friedWhy is a federal magistrate judge assigned to a state case? That is a new York city specific law not a federal law case. Shouldn't it be a municipal judge?
It's a two way street, chicks are bird brains who want get "mixey" paired with creep nikkas waiting in the cut to pounch. Hoes being stupid don't mean they deserve to get raped, but when you try to have the convo on what they need to do to protect themselves from creeps you get met with the shaming argument so I personally stay outta them situations all to gather.
Federal courts don't hear state cases only federal law. But another poster explained why it might fall under federal jurisdiction, still odd.The case was filed in SDNY. i.e. federal court
I thought it was a federal civil case. Which exist.Federal courts don't hear state cases only federal law. But another poster explained why it might fall under federal jurisdiction, still odd.
This is civil, not criminal so there is no jail time, just miney.The law is a New York city law, not even a state law, which makes it super odd why it's in federal court.2423 makes it a federal felony punishable by up to 30 years to travel across state lines, into the United States, or even to a foreign country (if that person is a U.S. citizen or permanent resident) for the purpose of engaging in illegal sexual conduct... He's fried
Naw it's a NYC admin law.I thought it was a federal civil case. Which exist.
But idk. Above my pay grade. I’m not an attorney.
Even though its a civil case Its cause they are using the crossing of state lines for sex trafficking which is against federal law. Federal court can hear civil cases too.This is civil, not criminal so there is no jail time, just miney.The law is a New York city law, not even a state law, which makes it super odd why it's in federal court.
People playing with a real lose definition of sex trafficking. There was not a commercial sex act involved.Even though its a civil case Its cause they are using the crossing of state lines for sex trafficking which is against federal law. Federal court can hear civil cases too.
People playing with a real lose definition of sex trafficking. There was not a commercial sex act involved.
Look if a woman was raped I am all for throwing the book at the rapist. But so many allegations lack any proof whatsoever.
Being an a$$hole to women is not illegal. Treating women poorly is not illegal. Puff is a a$$hole it's been on display for years. Definitely not a good person. But that's not illegal. If she got proof the fry him. But he said she said from an event that happened 20 years ago .....nah.
This is not why the system goes after you tho.No, he was just a piece of shyt for too many years and that always comes back to haunt you