"Death to the Pessimistic State of Mind" - Nas Voice: NYK '23 Pre-Season Thread

Peter Popoff

Baba Yega in black uptowns
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
30,278
Reputation
11,079
Daps
88,221
I don't know. Woj usually tweets ambiguously unless it's a done deal but it seems pretty direct that Utah wanted RJ and that he was in the discussion which is why the ext was pushed back.
Yea, Knicks probably wanted to package him with Randle but Ainge laughed cause he don't want that bum Randle.
 

tremonthustler1

aka bx_representer
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
83,523
Reputation
9,184
Daps
207,109
Reppin
My Pops Forever RIP
I don't know. Woj usually tweets ambiguously unless it's a done deal but it seems pretty direct that Utah wanted RJ and that he was in the discussion which is why the ext was pushed back.
There was talk that either Mitchell would get dealt or NY would move onto re-upping RJ and wrapping up their offseason for now. Outside of the picks, it feels like they're haggling over pieces that aren't that important (basically any Knick player not named Grimes maybe)


Now, I think he'll eventually be a Knick, but realistically Utah's gonna keep him through at least the all-star game because it's in SLC.

Ainge didn't wanna pay RJ (granted he's paying THT now). Where Ainge looks bad now is that if he was hellbent on dealing Mitchell for max value then he shoulda held off on dealing the Frenchman first because that offer was never coming off the table.
 

firemanBk

The Manslayer
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,106
Reputation
1,711
Daps
41,699
Reppin
Brooklyn
I don't know. Woj usually tweets ambiguously unless it's a done deal but it seems pretty direct that Utah wanted RJ and that he was in the discussion which is why the ext was pushed back.
Maybe they did and this was the Knicks being like "fukk you we still have the best deal you can get but now he's completely off the table regardless" which is true. Even without Barrett there is no team that can offer the combination of matching salaries, the draft capital or young players the Knicks can offer
 

Voice of Reason

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
45,209
Reputation
666
Daps
128,428
Maybe they did and this was the Knicks being like "fukk you we still have the best deal you can get but now he's completely off the table regardless" which is true. Even without Barrett there is no team that can offer the combination of matching salaries, the draft capital or young players the Knicks can offer



Right this means they took Barrett off of the table.

I wonder what happens next:jbhmm:


Seems like they don't want to budge on Picks either.
 
Top