Brian O'Conner
All Star
sony still has the right to 900 marvel charachters too for the next 7 years at least
The first movie was the first to gross $100M in a weekend.Dude is full of shyt. He's a known hater on here of that trilogy
The third Raimi movie and the TASM franchise was trash tho....
You just posting to post at this point.
Sony probably thinks they will continue to see big numbers from venom and will probably shelf Spider-Man until they get a big named director that will promise to “take care” of the franchise. But as it stands I ain’t fukking with any more non marvel produced movies about their characters. And I wouldn’t be surprised if all them shot flop going forward
Bruh. I grew up on comics. We are in the golden age with FX and great actors taking roles. Fans supporting. Bubble hasn’t bust. Now is the time.They're basically supporting monopolization without even knowing it. Is it really worth it to the film industry for Disney to own close to (if not) 50% of every studio just so Spiderman can interact with MCU characters? Apparently so for some people.
Bruh. I grew up on comics. We are in the golden age with FX and great actors taking roles. Fans supporting. Bubble hasn’t bust. Now is the time.
I don’t give two flying fukks about a monopoly when comics was DC or Marvel for me. Period. I don’t want to see 4000 marvel characters and then 6 in another universe. The fukk? If Sony had all the characters and Disney was hoarding 6, I’d say take the deal. It’s 50/50 on both sides. Call it a day.
I just wanna see my connected universe. Imagine DCU but Superman never shows up or is apart of the story. Hell no
Wasn't this the woman that was accused of abusing and stealing from Stan?yuup, even his OWN flesh and blood saying fukk DISNEY.
Uhhh ok... do you work for Sony or something? I don’t think it’s that seriousyuup, even his OWN flesh and blood saying fukk DISNEY. them nikkas can fukk themselves
Ooooooo you can feel the HURT oozing through this post... nikkas is GOING THROUGH IT frfr over comic book characters lmaoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
fukk this revision history the first 3 spider man movies almost buried the comic book live action movie genre
They were not loved. Damn near boo’d. I was in high school when they came out everyone hated these movies in my age group
Iron man and batman saved the genre. This the same forum that thinks Wu Tang was bigger than bone thugs in the 90s despite coming out same time and selling 20 million less records in the same time span i know better than to take anyone opinion here seriously on something i lived and experienced myself
They made $ cause it was a reintroduction to comic book movies with big budget and spider man nAme attached
The movies were trash
FactsThe old Spider-Man joints sold more tickets than these.
Wasn't this the woman that was accused of abusing and stealing from Stan?
Don’t feed the trollUhhh ok... do you work for Sony or something? I don’t think it’s that serious
So anyone that disagrees with you must be hurt right? It’s not just that marvel made better Spider-Man movies than Sony and I want to see that continue? Whatever
Wow what do you know. The two general consensus, best Spiderman movies ever made, were both made by Sony. Yet supposedly Sony never made any good Spiderman moviesi didn't adore SP2 as much as everyone else but it's still the best spider-man movie along with into the spider verse
Wow what do you know. The two general consensus, best Spiderman movies ever made, were both made by Sony. Yet supposedly Sony never made any good Spiderman movies