Chris Paul is a TRUE point guard, unlike Steph Curry

Megadeus

Superstar
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
6,397
Reputation
1,590
Daps
30,400
Laughable. CP3 is obviously a great pg. But Curry has moved the pg position forward in way cp can only dream of. Cp is not in the same class I'm afraid. Curry will easy end up top 15. Cp will not be anywhere near top 20.

The point is that Currys game does not scream elite floor general the way a CP3's does. You are not a true PG if you need Draymond to command and facilitate for everyone.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
82,847
Reputation
8,620
Daps
223,404
The point is that Currys game does not scream elite floor general the way a CP3's does. You are not a true PG if you need Draymond to command and facilitate for everyone.
He doesn't need Draymond to do that; Draymond does that so it allows the Warriors to harness Steph's off-ball ability to open up scoring opportunities for the rest of the team. It's literally why the Warriors have had the most high-powered offense in the history of the game. Steph could easily play on-ball all the time (he did it under Jackson), but the offense wouldn't be as effective - Steph would put up better surface #s but his teammates wouldn't get the same degree of easy scoring opportunities.

Steph constantly running around in the halfcourt disturbs the flow of the defensive waters. The power of constant ball and player movement.
 

Ukbrotha

Superstar
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
15,982
Reputation
1,464
Daps
37,790
Reppin
Naija, London, Earth
The point is that Currys game does not scream elite floor general the way a CP3's does. You are not a true PG if you need Draymond to command and facilitate for everyone.
Sure, its pretty obvious Curry is a different type of PG. More about spacing and movement than one who controls the floor with the ball. I think it allows him to play with other elite players easier than cp personally.
 

SuperNintendo Chalmers

Send it to the friggin moon idiot
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
4,568
Reputation
1,590
Daps
27,648
Reppin
My goddamn self. Shout out to my real Africans
He doesn't need Draymond to do that; Draymond does that so it allows the Warriors to harness Steph's off-ball ability to open up scoring opportunities for the rest of the team. It's literally why the Warriors have had the most high-powered offense in the history of the game. Steph could easily play on-ball all the time (he did it under Jackson), but the offense wouldn't be as effective - Steph would put up better surface #s but his teammates wouldn't get the same degree of easy scoring opportunities.

Steph constantly running around in the halfcourt disturbs the flow of the defensive waters. The power of constant ball and player movement.

Right. He might be the GOAT combo guard. :manny:
 

Jekyll

Superstar
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Messages
7,645
Reputation
839
Daps
33,006
Reppin
NULL
Steph is a combo guard that isn't nearly as good without other allstars/shooters. CP3 is washed but he has shown to be alot better than what Steph is giving us now as the singular point guard.
 
Joined
Dec 19, 2017
Messages
14,505
Reputation
3,877
Daps
58,071
Steph is a less athletic AI, with MUCH better shooting ability but not as good defensively.

He essentially plays the point like AI but is really more of an undersized 2-guard.
 

BigMoneyGrip

I'm Lamont's pops
Supporter
Joined
Nov 20, 2016
Messages
79,564
Reputation
10,905
Daps
314,539
Reppin
Straight from Flatbush
Steph is a combo guard that isn't nearly as good without other allstars/shooters. CP3 is washed but he has shown to be alot better than what Steph is giving us now as the singular point guard.
So what was Steph before KD? All you clowns nikkas do is set the narrative as if Steph just came into the league after KD came to the warriors..
 
Top