Brehs who are talking about the consequences
What benefit does marvel killing of characters have for the product or company?
With that being said the crippling of Rhodes did feel like a cheap cop out to replace death
I agree. Can't be like the comics where characters "die" and then come back some issues later. These companies glut contracts and way too much money invested to really kill off anybody. The only character I see going down us possibly Cap in infinity war and bucky takes over.
Thats what I been saying too... to the cats that keep whining about "consequences" or mad that someone aint die. Why the fukk does someone have to die and what purpose does that serve if you're trying to build a universe? I'm still mad they killed buddy in AoU and hope somehow he's revived down the line.
I'm not mad at Rhodey getting fukked up cuz lets be real, in war there are always gonna be some injuries...... but again with the death thing.... if they are not currently dead in the cartoons or comics or have NEVER died in any medium, why kill them on the big screen just because?
If cats want characters to die so bad, I'd rather then Marvel just start creating random never been in comics characters for the movies, build them up and make them take the sacrificial bullet down the line.... but dont kill someone that dont need to be killed.... shyt is stupid.... villains included