@NoChill Jones
Request: If you have a conversation with me ..well first off, Hey thanks
That said, please converse with me based on what I have explicitly stated. I don't want to deal with a
"proxy conversation" based on previous thecoli threads you've engaged in with other people.
Working definitions (subject to cleaning up)
Proxy conversation - 1st party argues a perspective against an absent 3rd party's statements via the present individual they are currently engaged in conversation with. This is triggered by the 1st party falling into a
"semantic trap" concerning superficial similarities in position stated by the 2nd & 3rd parties statements.
hood definition: something I said sounds a little like the last nikka, so you talk to me like I'm that last nikka saying the same thing again.
X = [a,b,g,h]
Y = [a,b,j,k]
Semantic Trap ---> X==Y because they both contain [a,b,_,_]
NO X & Y are distinct as in some attributes are the same while others are different.
If I say [a,b,...] don't assume [...,g,h] is coming next.
I.E. if I never said it in the OP don't bring it up.
1. When did I say anything about not using the U.S. (fiat) bank note or not also buying / selling within the wider market U.S.
2. You need to abide by the city, county, state, federal Property, Real Estate, and zoning Laws like anyone else ...you thinking of building on federal reserve land or something
3. You need to abide by the same
guidelines as anyone else
Basic Importing and Exporting | U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Importing - Licenses/Permits
4. Correct, that's called a tax base
5. Where exactly in my OP did I use the word "separate"? What definition of "separate" are you using anyway?
1. How is it that "our piece of the pie" is not secured within the context outlined in the OP?
2. How is it that the context outlined in the OP doesn't lessen the capacity for cacs to "
fukk it up....just to throw thier own hatred in our faces" and increase our capacity to weather the attack?
3. This tells me a lot about your mentality and the range of political positions you are capable of coming to.
I.E. even if we give everyone the same ingredients(knowledge), what ultimately gets cooked(cognition) is dependent on who each person is cooking for.
(The end result of your cognitive process is dependent on your goals, principles, values, world view, etc ...some people simply don't have the same goals as you, has nothing to do with them being illogical.)
4. I'll bite
...and what exactly is this
"big picture" you speak of?
Here is a basic outline from a previous thread of my
"big picture"(
I plan to make a detailed thread soon)...