OR WE CAN TALK ABOUT HOW
THEY WASTED A BUNCH OF TIME
AND A TIMEOUT IN THE RED ZONE
WHEN THEY COULD HAVE SIMPLY KICKED A SHORT FG AND PLAYED DEFENSE
WITH 3 TIMEOUTS LEFT.
Right.
OR WE CAN TALK ABOUT HOW
THEY WASTED A BUNCH OF TIME
AND A TIMEOUT IN THE RED ZONE
WHEN THEY COULD HAVE SIMPLY KICKED A SHORT FG AND PLAYED DEFENSE
WITH 3 TIMEOUTS LEFT.
You can’t have it both ways man.
“They were aggressive all season”
Well were was it then. That could have been a kill shot going up 21
He took the easy way out and wanted to be up 3 scores but somehow lost his balls to actually “be aggressive”
Then decided to get back to being aggressive when they just needed to stop the bleeding.
If he misses a FG once then okay atleast you tried. You didn’t even give him a chance to fukk up because you decided to go for a historically low % play multiple times on the road against the #1 seed
They literally said after half they talked to Campbell and he said “they were a smidge too far” he was going to go for it there too. And should have since “aggressive” is the cultureYea this makes no sense dude. Lions have taken short FGs all season. That has nothing to do with being aggressive. The aggression they've shown has been about long FGs in no man's land where punting makes no sense and a FG isn't automatic. In those situations when it's 4th and manageable, they've gone for it. The only way you think this is a contradiction is if you don't understand football. And I know you understand football so I'm baffled why you're making this argument right now.
Ran the ball on third downRight.
The players fukked up plenty but even with that they was still in the game til the final minute but coaching gave them no shot
Like you said at that point they would have needed a FG anyway so all of a sudden you are okay with him kicking a 45 yarder with 5 seconds left? Or a 25 yarder with 1 minute and 3 timeouts
But what he's saying is correctYea this makes no sense dude. Lions have taken short FGs all season. That has nothing to do with being aggressive. The aggression they've shown has been about long FGs in no man's land where punting makes no sense and a FG isn't automatic. In those situations when it's 4th and manageable, they've gone for it. The only way you think this is a contradiction is if you don't understand football. And I know you understand football so I'm baffled why you're making this argument right now.
Right.
The players fukked up plenty but even with that they was still in the game til the final minute but coaching gave them no shot
Like you said at that point they would have needed a FG anyway so all of a sudden you are okay with him kicking a 45 yarder with 5 seconds left? Or a 25 yarder with 1 minute and 3 timeouts
We've been playing this way all season, and it worked. I'm never going to get mad at a coach sticking to his game plan or identity. You go for it because you expect your guys to make plays. Reynolds dropped what would have been an easy 1st down on that first 4th down. I have no respect for arguments that are purely based on hindsight.
If you want to kill someone, kill the OC for going empty backfield on the second 4th down. Campbell did nothing wrong.
Even with his players fukking up he could have saved them from themselves but chose stupidity every timeThat meathead Campbell would have gone for it and thrown a hail Mary for the win
Even with his players fukking up he could have saved them from themselves but chose stupidity every time
Ok, so the one where Goff got the ball right to his receiver who then dropped the ball. It was the right call. You play to win the game.
I'm so tired of this "take the FG/points" argument as if it's an automatic chip shot. It's not.
Am I taking a 70% chance on the road or am I letting my QB, who has balled out all year, make a play? And guess what, he made a play. The receiver dropped the ball.