BREAKING: Dan Campbell under investigation for game-fixing...colibrehs coppin pleas

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
50,628
Reputation
18,560
Daps
275,281


We've been playing this way all season, and it worked. I'm never going to get mad at a coach sticking to his game plan or identity. You go for it because you expect your guys to make plays. Reynolds dropped what would have been an easy 1st down on that first 4th down. I have no respect for arguments that are purely based on hindsight.

If you want to kill someone, kill the OC for going empty backfield on the second 4th down. Campbell did nothing wrong.
:manny:
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
52,625
Reputation
11,420
Daps
360,943
Reppin
CHICAGO


We've been playing this way all season, and it worked. I'm never going to get mad at a coach sticking to his game plan or identity. You go for it because you expect your guys to make plays. Reynolds dropped what would have been an easy 1st down on that first 4th down. I have no respect for arguments that are purely based on hindsight.

If you want to kill someone, kill the OC for going empty backfield on the second 4th down. Campbell did nothing wrong.
:manny:


SO WHY DIDNT HE GO FOR IT
AT THE END OF THE HALF
WHEN THEY WERE MUCH CLOSER
TO THE ENDZONE?

THAT STAT IS MISLEADING.
:devil:
:evil:
 

jdubnyce

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
51,432
Reputation
12,554
Daps
238,798
Reppin
t-dot till they bury me


We've been playing this way all season, and it worked. I'm never going to get mad at a coach sticking to his game plan or identity. You go for it because you expect your guys to make plays. Reynolds dropped what would have been an easy 1st down on that first 4th down. I have no respect for arguments that are purely based on hindsight.

If you want to kill someone, kill the OC for going empty backfield on the second 4th down. Campbell did nothing wrong.
:manny:

But they kicked a 28yrd fg on 4th
right before half :dwillhuh:
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
50,628
Reputation
18,560
Daps
275,281

SO WHY DIDNT HE GO FOR IT
AT THE END OF THE HALF
WHEN THEY WERE MUCH CLOSER
TO THE ENDZONE?

THAT STAT IS MISLEADING.
:devil:
:evil:


Because it was a <30 yard chip shot FG before halftime and the Niners were getting the ball first? VS a 48 yard FG while down 3. Come on fam. Do you watch football or not. You can't possibly be comparing those two decisions, which were completely different.
 

Trojan 24

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
36,320
Reputation
3,214
Daps
139,070
Reppin
Just Win Baby

SO WHY DIDNT HE GO FOR IT
AT THE END OF THE HALF
WHEN THEY WERE MUCH CLOSER
TO THE ENDZONE?

THAT STAT IS MISLEADING.
:devil:
:evil:


That FG kept the momentum in their favor and was a great way to enter the half. Makes no sense to then flip the script when you had a chance to go up 3 scores. Then you double down on that and pass up a chance to tie the game and allow your team a chance to reset :dead:
 

Based Lord Zedd

Colts or Die
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
10,550
Reputation
1,326
Daps
29,162
Reppin
Houston TX
Because it was a <30 yard chip shot FG before halftime and the Niners were getting the ball first? VS a 48 yard FG while down 3. Come on fam. Do you watch football or not. You can't possibly be comparing those two decisions, which were completely different.

Isn't that effectively what the tweet you posted did? Compare a bunch of different 4th down scenarios to paint a narrative that the Lions didn't make a poor decision tonight.
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
52,625
Reputation
11,420
Daps
360,943
Reppin
CHICAGO
Because it was a <30 yard chip shot FG before halftime and the Niners were getting the ball first? VS a 48 yard FG while down 3. Come on fam. Do you watch football or not. You can't possibly be comparing those two decisions, which were completely different.

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE 45 YARDER
ON THEIR FIRST POSSESSION OF THE SECOND HALF TO TRADE FGS WITH SF
AND GAIN A 17 PT LEAD....
SAME SCENARIO AS THEIR PREVIOUS POSSESSION.

YOU DEFINITELY TAKE THE fukkING FG
DOWN 3 MID WAY THROUGH THE 4TH.
THAT ISNT EVEN DEBATABLE.
:devil:
:evil:
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
50,628
Reputation
18,560
Daps
275,281

WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE 45 YARDER
ON THEIR FIRST POSSESSION OF THE SECOND HALF TO TRADE FGS WITH SF
AND GAIN A 17 PT LEAD....
SAME SCENARIO AS THEIR PREVIOUS POSSESSION.

YOU DEFINITELY TAKE THE fukkING FG
DOWN 3 MID WAY THROUGH THE 4TH.
THAT ISNT EVEN DEBATABLE.
:devil:
:evil:

Ok, so the one where Goff got the ball right to his receiver who then dropped the ball. It was the right call. You play to win the game.

I'm so tired of this "take the FG/points" argument as if it's an automatic chip shot. It's not.


Am I taking a 70% chance on the road or am I letting my QB, who has balled out all year, make a play? And guess what, he made a play. The receiver dropped the ball.
 

CHICAGO

Vol. 9: Trapped
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
52,625
Reputation
11,420
Daps
360,943
Reppin
CHICAGO
Ok, so the one where Goff got the ball right to his receiver who then dropped the ball. It was the right call. You play to win the game.

I'm so tired of this "take the FG/points" argument as if it's an automatic chip shot. It's not.


Am I taking a 70% chance on the road or am I letting my QB, who has balled out all year, make a play? And guess what, he made a play. The receiver dropped the ball.


:dead:GOING UP 3 SCORES IS PLAYING
TO WIN THE GAME.

:devil:
:evil:
 

wire28

Blade said what up
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
50,298
Reputation
12,021
Daps
186,235
Reppin
#ByrdGang #TheColi
Because it was a <30 yard chip shot FG before halftime and the Niners were getting the ball first? VS a 48 yard FG while down 3. Come on fam. Do you watch football or not. You can't possibly be comparing those two decisions, which were completely different.
You can’t have it both ways man.

“They were aggressive all season”

Well were was it then. That could have been a kill shot going up 21

He took the easy way out and wanted to be up 3 scores but somehow lost his balls to actually “be aggressive”

Then decided to get back to being aggressive when they just needed to stop the bleeding.

If he misses a FG once then okay atleast you tried. You didn’t even give him a chance to fukk up because you decided to go for a historically low % play multiple times on the road against the #1 seed
 

FlyBoy718

All Star
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
4,338
Reputation
583
Daps
10,100
Reppin
BK
Yeah it was a complete collapse in the second half
But not kicking that FG to make it a 3 score lead again was egregious
That turned the entire game around
I know Reynolds dropped it but still that's why you don't make that risk
Then breh doubled down and chose not to kick a FG to tie the game. While it's no guarantee, you need the points.
 
Top