Ezekiel 25:17
Veteran
Her gross salary was $250k. What dumb bytch. Your life is officially and permanently in the mud
Cacs been on her ass since defiantly trying to prosecute those cops for Freddie Grays murder.
too bad the law doesn’t see it that way. Her personal interpretation isn’t good enough. Hell, she may have fared better saying it was for the tax lien.
And she handed them an alley-oop.Cacs been on her ass since defiantly trying to prosecute those cops for Freddie Grays murder.
I think there was specified language. But she hired Reed Smith so she should be fine.I see cacs in here… It’s her retirement money and if any of you clowns had a gov retirement or deferred compensation account in 2020 you was allowed to withdraw up to 100k out of your retirement due to Covid… Cops, Postmen, firefighters etc did this across the board..
She will be found not guilty… This indictment is just to muddy her name
If she facially ignored the language, again, it won't be as easy an argument. If there's some ambiguity it should be a slam dunk.She was well within her right to withdraw her own money so how is it stupid?
What was the criteria? In 2020 you were allowed to withdraw up to 100k without PENALTY… Try again homie
cops, firefighters, correctional officers etc didn’t experience any hardship yet they took full advantage of withdrawing from their retirement to buy houses, cars boats etc
Mosby had not experienced adverse financial consequences stemming from the coronavirus as a result of ‘being quarantined, furloughed or laid off’ or ‘having reduced work hours’ or ‘due to lack of childcare’ or ‘the closing or reduction of hours of a business I own or operate’” - all perquisites for obtaining the loan, which Mosby attested to under penalty of perjury,” federal prosecutors wrote in the indictment.
What do you have against Marilyn?
Outside of the Keith Davis prosecution, she's done her best to keep black people out of jail in Baltimore.
As long as you tell the truth on the application you can do whatever you want.So she can’t do what she see fit with her own money
According to the article
I mean
A hardship distribution is a withdrawal from a participant's elective deferral account made because of an immediate and heavy financial need, and limited to the amount necessary to satisfy that financial need. The money is taxed to the participant and is not paid back to the borrower's account.
And buying a half mill rental property with the money probably will never qualify as an immediate and heavy financial need. You tried and so did she.
Spoken like a city worker who withdrew out of his pension under questionable circumstances.how are they going to decide what type of adverse consequences she had. To me that screams personal interpretation. Unless I see otherwise. It needs to say x amount of loss to salary or something. If it just says hardship you decide that.
Lmao an immediate and heavy financial need.what qualifies?