Are Africans and people of African descent who aren't AA black?

Bonk

God’s Son
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
4,430
Reputation
1,164
Daps
16,751
Reppin
In Da 15th

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,881
Reputation
9,501
Daps
81,307
People of African descent have been called "black" for over a thousand years. Many of the Precolonial names for African regions and Countries known to outsiders literally translates to "land of the blacks" in a multitude of foreign languages. You must really be retarded to think that African Americans are the only ones who can use "black" as an identifier

they've been called a word that translates to "black" or dark skinned but the "black" that we use today, pioneered in the USA is more expansive/inclusive and much different and the one that has gone global. This is why africans, tons of west indians and latin americans are shocked when they come to the USA and find out they're "black" or just exactly how great the range of what people who identify as "black" in the USA can look like because "black" in the usa while having a bases in phneotype is more about african descent and state of mind regardless of your look


jB3qSkA.png


qriZkj5.jpg



vS1soxc.jpg


4INvIdC.jpg


uzAjnYz.jpg
.
.












Stuart Hall (Jamaican)

Stuart Hall (cultural theorist) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

.
.


..say "black" wasn't used in Jamaica until the 1970's, right around the time of the Civil Right and BlackPower in the USA:jbhmm:











when "black" became an identity in Jamaica

 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,881
Reputation
9,501
Daps
81,307
Sudan is another one. Comes from the Arabic "Aswad" = black.

Ethiopia = burnt face.

while those are describing a complexion, the modern term "black" goes beyond that. This is why a good deal of those same sudanese and ethiopions that you speak of who are not hip to western racial classifications will tell you they aren't "Black" in a racial sense
 

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,508
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
while those are describing a complexion, the modern term "black" goes beyond that. This is why a good deal of those same sudanese and ethiopions that you speak of who are not hip to western racial classifications will tell you they aren't "Black" in a racial sense
lol untrue

But continue
 

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,508
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
@IllmaticDelta

Horners and NS were recently apart of the "Caucasoid race." That had more to do with their thinking than the term Athiopian.

And the term DID go beyond skin complexion. Because the Greeks noted curly hair, thick lips and other features unique to Africans at the time. Hell Northwest Africans were noted as "lighter Aethiopians." So again it went BEYOND complexions. You need to read some early Greek/Roman text.
 

GrindtooFilthy

World Class SuperVillain
Supporter
Joined
Feb 22, 2014
Messages
16,022
Reputation
3,052
Daps
43,039
Reppin
MA, CT, NH
black is the just the pc term of negro

if you can trace your lineage back to sub Saharan Africa you are not black

how is this up for debate
 

IllmaticDelta

Veteran
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
28,881
Reputation
9,501
Daps
81,307
@IllmaticDelta

Horners and NS were recently apart of the "Caucasoid race." That had more to do with their thinking than the term Athiopian.

Horners had their own thoughts before they knew anything about the anthro world

And the term DID go beyond skin complexion. Because the Greeks noted curly hair, thick lips and other features unique to Africans at the time. Hell Northwest Africans were noted as "lighter Aethiopians." So again it went BEYOND complexions. You need to read some early Greek/Roman text.

the greek word originally just meant anyone darker than themselves regardless of continent/location, including indians. Im talking in regards to north east africans/abbysinians
 

KingSlime

All Star
Joined
May 14, 2015
Messages
601
Reputation
240
Daps
3,009
they've been called a word that translates to "black" or dark skinned but the "black" that we use today, pioneered in the USA is more expansive/inclusive and much different and the one that has gone global. This is why africans, tons of west indians and latin americans are shocked when they come to the USA and find out they're "black" or just exactly how great the range of what people who identify as "black" in the USA can look like because "black" in the usa while having a bases in phneotype is more about african descent and state of mind regardless of your look
Black ethno racial consciousness has existed already in every single society where african slavery or colonialism has taken place. You posted a string of etymological diatribes about non AA's apparently not knowing they were "black" until coming to the United States when using the term "black" as a mainstream cultural identifier didn't even hit the United States until the 60's.

When African Americans of previous generations called themselves Negros, or Coloured or what have you did you think that made them any less aware of the social status of themselves and people who looked like themselves in a predominantly white societies all around the world and the cultural ties that held them together as a community? Are African Americans gifted with a degree of sentience that other negroes aren't?

They just had different ways of describing what was the same exact thing: A trans-ethnic and trans-nationalistic marker of identity for those who are descended from Africa and victims of the global system of white supremacy. And this is disregarding the fact that many black communities outside of the U.S. starting heralding the idea of black consciousness using that literal word decades before African Americans. Afro-Arab scholar Al Jahiz who was born in 7th Century Iraq wrote an entire book on what it meant to be black. The affirmation of black identity is stated explicitly in the first few lines of the Haitian Constitution. In the 1930s Francophone black countries in Africa and the Caribbean had the Negritude,( or "the Blackness" movement in English) propelled many independence movements for the continent. Etc.
 

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,508
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
@IllmaticDelta

Wrong again.

1. Describe "anthro world" because it was Europeans during their first contact that said they were not "Negroids." And can you PROVE Horners especially Oromos who identify as black had their minds made up before European contact?


2. Wrong again. It wasnt just ANYONE darker than them otherwise Persians and other Near Easterners TOO would be grouped in as Aethiopian. More importantly Indians(southern) were grouped in as EASTERN Aethiopians. Separate from Africans they saw. They knew the difference.
 

Bawon Samedi

Good bye Coli
Supporter
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
42,413
Reputation
18,635
Daps
166,508
Reppin
Good bye Coli(2014-2020)
The "Black" that AAs created was basically a "genetic version." "Black" can now be a DNA. A more evolved version of the one drop rule...

This is why lighter skinned Afro Latinos or even North Africans who consider themselves "Black" are using the new and improved AA version of "Black."

But the strictly phenotypic version of Black clearly predates AAs. Any arguing against that is denial. This is why SOME non-AAs have a hard time accepting blacks with non-stereotypical black features as black because they're using the strictly dated phenotype version.
 
Top