What precisely IS your viewpoint?
If your arguing that the mother is being unfairly criticized and want proof to the contrary, can YOU provide proof that the mother made adequate and acceptable effort for the children to be with and spend time with their father? That all of Kel’s time and money fighting for VISITATION was simply a waste of resources and all it took for him to see his kids was simply be willing and present?
Because on ONE END we have verifiable documentation that says otherwise….
Or perhaps you’re argument is that the daughter somehow got this warped perception in her head that her father didn’t want to see her, DESPITE him attending reunification courses, all on her own? The mother bore absolutely NO responsibility whatsoever (as the primary caregiver) in shaping the child’s opinion of her father and the unfortunate situation that led to him not being an active participate in her upbringing?
Somehow SOME WAY a man paying and fighting for YEARS (as documented) for the right to visit his children and the message got misconstrued that HE was the reason for this so called “Parental Alienation”?
Again i’m seeking to comprehend what your argument is here. Because the truth of the matter is that SOMEBODY is responsible for this now grown woman feeling as if her father didn’t want to be in her life. And if we’re absolving the lying, scheming, vindictive mother (again this is all documented not just me piling on her) then that means we’re laying blame on the father who paid lawyers to fight for visitation. The father who attended reunification courses. The father who continued providing financially for her well INTO adulthood.
Please clarify
OMG. Straw man galore. I am convinced nan one of y’all read my posts for comprehension purposes.
My viewpoint:
It is asinine to keep bringing up and blaming the mother for Kel’s absence from the daughters life. The daughter is grown now. What’s done is done. The fact of the matter is, he missed time.
I understand and acknowledge Kel’s financial commitment to his children’s life. I understand and acknowledge Kel’s consistent back and forth to family court.
Moral of the story:
Moving forward, If Kel truly wants to be a good father to his daughter, time and emotional support makes up missed time. Not money, not apartments, not cars.