Another black child of a celebrity exposes her dad: Thanks Romeo !

The Radiant One

Superstar
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
3,181
Reputation
537
Daps
15,744
Can you cite any official documents that state the mother kept the children away from the father?

The court ordered remediation is from another thread on this issue that was posted today.

While parental alienation is a possibility, the truth of the matter is; it could have been a multitude of factors that led to Kel being estranged from his kids. The end result is the child is the ultimate loser.

The daughter’s post is indicative of her losing out on a positive relationship with her father.

Can you say documentation stating otherwise? I mean the mother has been convicted of identity fraud. So now he does remediation therapy and pays for various things in their lives. But now we have to have documentation? I’ll wait for your documentation. The daughter may have lost on a positive relationship because the mother and daughter attack him. If you want to build a relationship, why are you attacking your father on TikTok?
 

Colicat

Docile & dominant @ the same damn time
Supporter
Joined
Mar 29, 2014
Messages
13,999
Reputation
5,313
Daps
55,627
Reppin
Adjacent to the King
Can you say documentation stating otherwise? I mean the mother has been convicted of identity fraud. So now he does remediation therapy and pays for various things in their lives. But now we have to have documentation? I’ll wait for your documentation. The daughter may have lost on a positive relationship because the mother and daughter attack him. If you want to build a relationship, why are you attacking your father on TikTok?

You made the claim that the mother withheld the children from their father, then you want me to provide evidence?

You make no sense. You don’t have any evidence of your assertion. If you want to stick up for Kel because he’s a Black man, instead of being logical and fair minded; just say that.
 

The Radiant One

Superstar
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
3,181
Reputation
537
Daps
15,744
You made the claim that the mother withheld the children from their father, then you want me to provide evidence?

You make no sense. You don’t have any evidence of your assertion. If you want to stick up for Kel because he’s a Black man, instead of being logical and fair minded; just say that.


If you are acusó g someone of being a dead beat the burden of proof is in you.


I posted the article where Kell showed that his ex wife was convicted of identity fraud. You also just take the daughters word for it but he has a presence and still supports her in college but he’s a deadbeat? He does therapy (which he doesn’t have to do)
 
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
64,643
Reputation
27,646
Daps
384,252
Reppin
Ft. Stewart, Ga
So basically the mother was a terrible woman who weaponized the man’s own daughter against him and even with the mother doing her BEST to not only destroy his reputation but potentially have him put in JAIL with fake and false accusations and a daughter who was predisposed to hating him he STILL was fighting for visitation and reunification….


And nikkas from the jump automatically wanted to label him a deadbeat.


Ya’ll gonna learn to start waiting for the FACTS when it comes to your fetishes for vilifying black men.


About three weeks after reunification therapy, in November 2012, Kel described the “emotional” session at a court hearing–according to court transcripts.

“Yes. It really was [emotional]. To not see them in six years and to finally be able to see them, and my son was…was upset, and he was hurt,” Kel told the judge. “My daughter was also as well. They would look straight out the window and not at me. And they said that we don’t want to see you, we have a father.”
Kel added:

“They seemed very rehearsed, though. And I told them that I’ve been trying to see them for years and without talking about their mother, telling them that I loved them, and my number’s here if you want to reach me. Here it is. And I’m here for you, and I love you, and you might not feel this way later.”
While in court in November 2012, Kel’s lawyer accused Hampton of doing “what she wants to do” without consequence, including missing court dates.

His lawyer told the judge:

“She’s not here today. We’ve been here several times where she doesn’t show up. She comes up with any excuse not to participate in the process.”

 

Colicat

Docile & dominant @ the same damn time
Supporter
Joined
Mar 29, 2014
Messages
13,999
Reputation
5,313
Daps
55,627
Reppin
Adjacent to the King
If you are acusó g someone of being a dead beat the burden of proof is in you.


I posted the article where Kell showed that his ex wife was convicted of identity fraud. You also just take the daughters word for it but he has a presence and still supports her in college but he’s a deadbeat? He does therapy (which he doesn’t have to do)
The daughter said he wasn’t a presence in her life from the time she was 5 to the time she was 15. Court documents state that he went to mandated counseling after 6 years of not seeing the kids because the kids refused to see him. It’s not just taking the daughter’s word.

You are arguing the reason for his absence. Assigning blame.

Support your assertion with facts. What evidence of parental alienation do you have? It is definitely a possibility. So where is the evidence?

Committing identity theft to keep a home in your name is peanuts compared to parental alienation. It still doesn’t confirm that parental alienation occurred. That is a serious accusation.
 

The Radiant One

Superstar
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
3,181
Reputation
537
Daps
15,744
The daughter said he wasn’t a presence in her life from the time she was 5 to the time she was 15. Court documents state that he went to mandated counseling after 6 years of not seeing the kids because the kids refused to see him. It’s not just taking the daughter’s word.

You are arguing the reason for his absence. Assigning blame.

Support your assertion with facts. What evidence of parental alienation do you have? It is definitely a possibility. So where is the evidence?

Committing identity theft to keep a home in your name is peanuts compared to parental alienation. It still doesn’t confirm that parental alienation occurred. That is a serious accusation.

So the kids refused to see him but they have been reaching out? It was mandated because the kids can’t just refuse to not see a parent .

It’s not parental alienation

However, court docs say the father actively attempted to get visitation rights for several years after the split.

“Yes. It really was [emotional]. To not see them in six years and to finally be able to see them, and my son was…was upset, and he was hurt,” Kel told the judge. “My daughter was also as well. They would look straight out the window and not at me. And they said that we don’t want to see you, we have a father.”

“They seemed very rehearsed, though. And I told them that I’ve been trying to see them for years and without talking about their mother, telling them that I loved them, and my number’s here if you want to reach me. Here it is. And I’m here for you, and I love you, and you might not feel this way later.”





So which is it? You are painting that he hasn’t been in touch with his children but he made this video 9 years ago

His daughter said she made attempts to see her father and was rebuffed.

Show me evidence of that.
 

Colicat

Docile & dominant @ the same damn time
Supporter
Joined
Mar 29, 2014
Messages
13,999
Reputation
5,313
Daps
55,627
Reppin
Adjacent to the King
So basically the mother was a terrible woman who weaponized the man’s own daughter against him and even with the mother doing her BEST to not only destroy his reputation but potentially have him put in JAIL with fake and false accusations and a daughter who was predisposed to hating him he STILL was fighting for visitation and reunification….


And nikkas from the jump automatically wanted to label him a deadbeat.


Ya’ll gonna learn to start waiting for the FACTS when it comes to your fetishes for vilifying black men.


About three weeks after reunification therapy, in November 2012, Kel described the “emotional” session at a court hearing–according to court transcripts.

“Yes. It really was [emotional]. To not see them in six years and to finally be able to see them, and my son was…was upset, and he was hurt,” Kel told the judge. “My daughter was also as well. They would look straight out the window and not at me. And they said that we don’t want to see you, we have a father.”
Kel added:

“They seemed very rehearsed, though. And I told them that I’ve been trying to see them for years and without talking about their mother, telling them that I loved them, and my number’s here if you want to reach me. Here it is. And I’m here for you, and I love you, and you might not feel this way later.”
While in court in November 2012, Kel’s lawyer accused Hampton of doing “what she wants to do” without consequence, including missing court dates.

His lawyer told the judge:

“She’s not here today. We’ve been here several times where she doesn’t show up. She comes up with any excuse not to participate in the process.”


Was there a statement given from the ex-wife or her lawyer about the ex-wife’s absence? Was the ex-wife ever held in contempt for being absent?

It’s Kel’s lawyer giving an opinion on the ex-wife’s behavior. It’s the lawyer’s job to misconstrue and misrepresent the opponent’s actions.
So the kids refused to see him but they have been reaching out? It was mandated because the kids can’t just refuse to not see a parent .

It’s not parental alienation

However, court docs say the father actively attempted to get visitation rights for several years after the split.

“Yes. It really was [emotional]. To not see them in six years and to finally be able to see them, and my son was…was upset, and he was hurt,” Kel told the judge. “My daughter was also as well. They would look straight out the window and not at me. And they said that we don’t want to see you, we have a father.”

“They seemed very rehearsed, though. And I told them that I’ve been trying to see them for years and without talking about their mother, telling them that I loved them, and my number’s here if you want to reach me. Here it is. And I’m here for you, and I love you, and you might not feel this way later.”





So which is it? You are painting that he hasn’t been in touch with his children but he made this video 9 years ago

His daughter said she made attempts to see her father and was rebuffed.

Show me evidence of that.


I am not entertaining your request until you provide evidence of parental alienation from the mother.

Again, I am not saying that it’s not a possibility. If you are so certain that it did happen, where are the court documents where parental alienation was alleged?

Opinions from Kel’s lawyer mean nothing. If it were true, the lawyer would have put it in writing and used it in court.
 

The Radiant One

Superstar
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
3,181
Reputation
537
Daps
15,744
Was there a statement given from the ex-wife or her lawyer about the ex-wife’s absence? Was the ex-wife ever held in contempt for being absent?

It’s Kel’s lawyer giving an opinion on the ex-wife’s behavior. It’s the lawyer’s job to misconstrue and misrepresent the opponent’s actions.


I am not entertaining your request until you provide evidence of parental alienation from the mother.

Again, I am not saying that it’s not a possibility. If you are so certain that it did happen, where are the court documents where parental alienation was alleged?

Opinions from Kel’s lawyer mean nothing. If it were true, the lawyer would have put it in writing and used it in court.

While in court in November 2012, Kel’s lawyer accused Hampton of doing “what she wants to do”without consequence, including missing court dates.


His lawyer told the judge:

“She’s not here today. We’ve been here several times where she doesn’t show up. She comes up with any excuse not to participate in the process.”

Again, you can’t have it both ways you cannot say opinions from his lawyer me nothing but suddenly the opinions from his daughter mean something if so, they would’ve also use that in court

Also his wife being held in contempt of court means she will be imprisoned that doesn’t happen to the custodial parent.

Has Kel gone to jail for not paying child support if not why is the wife saying he owes 1 million in back support?

I entertained your banal requests so now show me evidence of Kel rebuffing the children which is what the daughter am d mother claim
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
64,643
Reputation
27,646
Daps
384,252
Reppin
Ft. Stewart, Ga
Was there a statement given from the ex-wife or her lawyer about the ex-wife’s absence? Was the ex-wife ever held in contempt for being absent?

It’s Kel’s lawyer giving an opinion on the ex-wife’s behavior. It’s the lawyer’s job to misconstrue and misrepresent the opponent’s actions.


I am not entertaining your request until you provide evidence of parental alienation from the mother.

Again, I am not saying that it’s not a possibility. If you are so certain that it did happen, where are the court documents where parental alienation was alleged?

Opinions from Kel’s lawyer mean nothing. If it were true, the lawyer would have put it in writing and used it in court.


So the Lawyer’s OPINION means absolutely nothing.

The fact that its DOCUMENTED that the man had been fighting to see his kids for YEARS means absolutely nothing…

The FACT that her claims of the man owing her an obscene amount of money was thrown out of court means nothing…

The FACT that he willingly went to reunification therapy to reconnect with his kids, even dealing with the emotional pain of them saying to his face they didn’t want to see him means nothing…

But the daughters words that the man who went through ALL of that, on TOP of continuing to provide for her well into adulthood, is willfully a deadbeat, are to be held as gospel? Is that what your argument is?
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
80,254
Reputation
11,030
Daps
216,314
So the Lawyer’s OPINION means absolutely nothing.

The fact that its DOCUMENTED that the man had been fighting to see his kids for YEARS means absolutely nothing…

The FACT that her claims of the man owing her an obscene amount of money was thrown out of court means nothing…

The FACT that he willingly went to reunification therapy to reconnect with his kids, even dealing with the emotional pain of them saying to his face they didn’t want to see him means nothing…

But the daughters words that the man who went through ALL of that, on TOP of continuing to provide for her well into adulthood, is willfully a deadbeat, are to be held as gospel? Is that what your argument is?

She hate black fathers. She is part of that "sistahood" that has venom for black men.
 

The Fade

I don’t argue with niqqas on the Internet anymore
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
23,836
Reputation
7,288
Daps
130,151
His ex wife is a hypertension/ high blood pressure inducing woman and gave her daughter the same generational curse.

They want us to fight the government all the time for every inconvenience they feel and think anything we do has no credibility

The ex wife has proven herself to not be credible
 
Top