Another black child of a celebrity exposes her dad: Thanks Romeo !

[Uncouth Savage]

Was there a statement given from the ex-wife or her lawyer about the ex-wife’s absence? Was the ex-wife ever held in contempt for being absent?

It’s Kel’s lawyer giving an opinion on the ex-wife’s behavior. It’s the lawyer’s job to misconstrue and misrepresent the opponent’s actions.


I am not entertaining your request until you provide evidence of parental alienation from the mother.

Again, I am not saying that it’s not a possibility. If you are so certain that it did happen, where are the court documents where parental alienation was alleged?

Opinions from Kel’s lawyer mean nothing. If it were true, the lawyer would have put it in writing and used it in court.

You a terrible person.

 

[Colicat]

So the Lawyer’s OPINION means absolutely nothing.

The fact that its DOCUMENTED that the man had been fighting to see his kids for YEARS means absolutely nothing…

The FACT that her claims of the man owing her an obscene amount of money was thrown out of court means nothing…

The FACT that he willingly went to reunification therapy to reconnect with his kids, even dealing with the emotional pain of them saying to his face they didn’t want to see him means nothing…

But the daughters words that the man who went through ALL of that, on TOP of continuing to provide for her well into adulthood, is willfully a deadbeat, are to be held as gospel? Is that what your argument is?

I’ll repeat since you want to use hyperbole. Kel’s lawyer’s opinion on the ex-wife’s absence in court means nothing.

The daughter stated that Kel was out of her life for 10 years.

It is documented that Kel was absent from his daughters life for years.

Kel was mandated to go to counseling. It was not voluntary.

The deadbeat narrative is a straw man narrative that y’all illogical behinds made up to defend Kel.

Who called Kel a deadbeat? Quote them. I’ll wait.

Y’all aren’t even trying to to comprehend the complexity of a strained parent child relationship. Y’all just go into blame mom mode.

Fine. You want to blame the ex-wife for the poor father child relationship, go right ahead.

Show the receipts for parental alienation, or kindly STFU.

 

[Colicat]

She hate black fathers. She is part of that "sistahood" that has venom for black men.

@ me wasteman. I only hate “Black” men like you, and rightfully so; you aint shyt.

 

[Colicat]

You a terrible person.

because my opinion is different from yours? Y’all are a joke.

 

[The Radiant One]

I’ll repeat since you want to use hyperbole. Kel’s lawyer’s opinion on the ex-wife’s absence in court means nothing.

The daughter stated that Kel was out of her life for 10 years.

It is documented that Kel was absent from his daughters life for years.

Kel was mandated to go to counseling. It was not voluntary.

The deadbeat narrative is a straw man narrative that y’all illogical behinds made up to defend Kel.

Who called Kel a deadbeat? Quote them. I’ll wait.

Y’all aren’t even trying to to comprehend the complexity of a strained parent child relationship. Y’all just go into blame mom mode.

Fine. You want to blame the ex-wife for the poor father child relationship, go right ahead.

Show the receipts for parental alienation, or kindly STFU.

There is no mandating reunification therapy unless he wants to you know “reunify” if he wanted nothing to do with a child like you claim, he wouldnt have done the therapy

 

[Colicat]

While in court in November 2012, Kel’s lawyer accused Hampton of doing “what she wants to do”without consequence, including missing court dates.


His lawyer told the judge:



Again, you can’t have it both ways you cannot say opinions from his lawyer me nothing but suddenly the opinions from his daughter mean something if so, they would’ve also use that in court

Also his wife being held in contempt of court means she will be imprisoned that doesn’t happen to the custodial parent.

Has Kel gone to jail for not paying child support if not why is the wife saying he owes 1 million in back support?

I entertained your banal requests so now show me evidence of Kel rebuffing the children which is what the daughter am d mother claim

Kel’s lawyer’s opinion on the mother’s absence in court means nothing. The lawyer complaining to the judge had no legal basis.
Was there a default judgement entered?

This discussion pertains to the daughter’s opinion on her experience of her father.

What does Kel’s lawyers’s opinion on the ex wife’s attendance to court have to do with the daughter speaking on her experience?

Y’all are dragging so many straw men into the conversation because y’all don’t want to admit that you don’t have any evidence of parental alienation.

 

[Wild self]

@ me wasteman. I only hate “Black” men like you, and rightfully so; you aint shyt.

I aint shyt? You the one ripping black men away from their daughters! You always been a bird.

 

[Colicat]

I aint shyt? You the one ripping black men away from their daughters! You always been a bird.

You are a looney toon.

 

[Colicat]

There is no mandating reunification therapy unless he wants to you know “reunify” if he wanted nothing to do with a child like you claim, he wouldnt have done the therapy

Another straw man. Quote where I said that Kel wanted nothing to do with his daughter.

This hyperbole and illogical reasoning has got to stop.

 

[The Radiant One]

Another straw man. Quote where I said that Kel wanted nothing to do with his daughter.

This hyperbole and illogical reasoning has got to stop.

That’s what the daughter is saying and if you are going by those arguments than that is your position.

 

[Colicat]

That’s what the daughter is saying and if you are going by those arguments than that is your position.

It’s ok. You are committed to misconstruing the conversation. No need for further back and forth. Be well.

 

[The Radiant One]

It’s ok. You are committed to misconstruing the conversation. No need for further back and forth. Be well.

Again you are painting what the daughter is saying as truth but when evidence shows that it isn’t true you dismiss it. She keeps on saying Kel didn’t want anything to do with her but somehow he pays a lawyer for custody?

If he didn’t care he would t be fighting for years lol

 

[Colicat]

Again you are painting what the daughter is saying as truth but when evidence shows that it isn’t true you dismiss it. She keeps on saying Kel didn’t want anything to do with her but somehow he pays a lawyer for custody?

If he didn’t care he would t be fighting for years lol

Until you are honest about my viewpoint, there is no need to converse.

 

[The Radiant One]

Until you are honest about my viewpoint, there is no need to converse.

Your viewpoint is that he has been ignoring his children and this hasn’t been any real conversation as you require evidence from me but when I show mine you dismiss it.

If he’s been ignoring then why is he still battling over a divorce a decade ago?

 

[Ziggiy]

Until you are honest about my viewpoint, there is no need to converse.

What precisely IS your viewpoint?

If your arguing that the mother is being unfairly criticized and want proof to the contrary, can YOU provide proof that the mother made adequate and acceptable effort for the children to be with and spend time with their father? That all of Kel’s time and money fighting for VISITATION was simply a waste of resources and all it took for him to see his kids was simply be willing and present?


Because on ONE END we have verifiable documentation that says otherwise….

Or perhaps you’re argument is that the daughter somehow got this warped perception in her head that her father didn’t want to see her, DESPITE him attending reunification courses, all on her own? The mother bore absolutely NO responsibility whatsoever (as the primary caregiver) in shaping the child’s opinion of her father and the unfortunate situation that led to him not being an active participate in her upbringing?

Somehow SOME WAY a man paying and fighting for YEARS (as documented) for the right to visit his children and the message got misconstrued that HE was the reason for this so called “Parental Alienation”?


Again i’m seeking to comprehend what your argument is here. Because the truth of the matter is that SOMEBODY is responsible for this now grown woman feeling as if her father didn’t want to be in her life. And if we’re absolving the lying, scheming, vindictive mother (again this is all documented not just me piling on her) then that means we’re laying blame on the father who paid lawyers to fight for visitation. The father who attended reunification courses. The father who continued providing financially for her well INTO adulthood.


Please clarify