Ann Coulter: Central Park 5 is guilty. The evidence against them is overwhelming.
- Thread starter #1 pick
- Start date
Everything aside none of that makes them guilty. It doesnt even provide speculation of them being guilty. What a dumb c*nt.
Toe Jay Simpson
Searchin’
Act like you know more than the justice system that reluctantly admitted they messed up brehs
eastsideTT
Superstar
she's still alive? I feel like this is the only way we'll ever know: every year or so she'll pop up and say something totally out of pocket to let people know she's still breathing. The world wouldn't care otherwise
Burned Verses
Superstar
And here’s the millionth reason why this ados chit for clowns
Last edited:
richaveli83
Veteran
fukk that cave bytch.
I think many of them are misinformation agents. I noticed how this shyt picked up after the 2016 election were foreigns were targeting African American voters. I think they still are manipulating narratives and using what is a sensitive topic in our community to troll and have people separated on hypothetical issues instead of focusing on attainable collective goals.Fools were out there in that ADOS thread claiming that she was an ally and that she BEEN an ally.
The government been screwing over Native American treaties for centuries, do you think they will ever do right by us? You couldn’t begin to repay us for the centuries of injustice
Trajan
Veteran
I rate Tariq for the way he handled her. She jumped on his timeline talking that ADOS shyt and he said since you're so concerned what's your position on reparations...or something to that effect.
She never replied to him
She never replied to him
Kyle C. Barker
Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
I wish she wasn't.
She was able to goad trump into forcing a government shutdown by basically calling him a p*ssy if he didn't do so.
Then on a smaller scale as she was able to gaslight certain posters on this board into thinking she was an ally
Can't be dismissive of the fact that @VegasCAC has his white ass all up and through the thread trying to tell black people how they should feel and how to operate/function. Dafuq is this about??
and black posters actually dapped this bullshyt spewing out of this cac's mouth. When he's representative of the "Anne Coulters" of the world. This is some twilight zone shyt. Black posters talking about white "allies" as vocal representatives and a white boy chiming in on black issues - then people wonder why whites feel emboldened enough to even think they have an opinion on our affairs. (I honestly didn't know who this @VegasCAC until that thread, I thought he was trolling with the name. but wow, this shyt is blatant) But said white boy should really just shut the fukk up and mind his business bc he's really not in position to know what our directives or goals are.
xoxodede
Superstar
Yeah, don't forget when I posted a few pages after that -- that I took that back.
Super troll ass.
Kyle C. Barker
Migos VERZUZ Mahalia Jackson
I rate Tariq for the way he handled her. She jumped on his timeline talking that ADOS shyt and he said since you're so concerned what's your position on reparations...or something to that effect.
She never replied to him
He was respectfully trying to build with her
Ados Coulter
The media demanded a rewrite, and Morgenthau was just the man to do it.
Reyes’ “confession” changed nothing about the evidence presented at trial. It was always known that other rapists got away: A small sample of semen on the jogger’s sock and cervix did not match any of the defendants'. That’s why, in her summation, prosecutor Elizabeth Lederer told the jury: "Others who were not caught raped her and got away."
Now we know: Reyes was one of those who “got away.”
Unlike the confessions of the boys convicted of the attack, Reyes's confession would result in no punishment. To the contrary, he was rewarded with a highly desirable prison transfer. Coincidentally, his conscience struck only after he was imprisoned with one of the convicted Central Park rapists, Kharey Wise, who happened to be the leader of a prison gang.
To be extra sure that the psychopath was telling the truth:
-- Reyes was never given a polygraph test.
-- The police were prohibited from interviewing him.
-- In fact, the police were prevented from even reviewing transcripts of the D.A.’s interviews with Reyes.
-- The police were further barred from interviewing Reyes’ prison acquaintances -- who said he’d admitted to joining a rape already in progress after hearing the jogger’s screams.
Ah, the argy-bargy of our hallowed adversary system of justice!
The maniacally repeated claim that “there was no physical evidence to tie the boys to the crime” is utter nonsense intended to fool the stupid.
What “physical evidence” were they expecting? There were no tire tracks, footprints, bullet casings or gun powder residue to be tested. The jogger’s pulverized body was found lying in a puddle of mud. The only conceivable “physical evidence” would be DNA.
But the use of DNA to solve crimes was nearly unheard of in 1989. No police force in the country would look for DNA to make a case. It was only about a year earlier that DNA had been used for the first time in any criminal court in the U.S.(Florida).
The very month that the jogger was attacked, newspapers were excitedly reporting on a novel forensic technique, a “still unfolding laboratory discovery, a genetic ‘fingerprint’ created from the body's deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA” -- as the Chicago Tribune put it.
Even five years later, DNA evidence wasn’t enough to convict O.J. Simpson.
Remember Robert Chambers, the “Preppie Killer”? He killed Jennifer Levin in Central Park three years before the Central Park wilding. Guess what? There was no “physical evidence” tying Chambers to Levin’s murder, either. Police solved it the same way they solved the Central Park rape case: circumstantial evidence and a confession.
Does anyone think Chambers is innocent? (No -- he’s white.)
Which reminds me: There was no “physical evidence” tying David Berkowitz to the Son of Sam killings. Nor was there any “physical evidence” tying John Gotti to the murder of Paul Castellano. There was no “physical evidence” tying Lee Harvey Oswald to President Kennedy’s assassination. Are they all innocent, too?
Hard to believe, but it was possible for crimes to be solved before 2001! (That's about when the use of DNA in criminal cases became widespread.)
What the police had against the Central Park Five were detailed confessions, on videotape, given in the presence of their parents or adult relatives; the deeply incriminating statements of at least a half-dozen of their friends and acquaintances; and the defendants’ knowledge of facts about the crime that only the perpetrators would know.
We’ll review some of the guilt evidence next week.
link:June 12, 2019 - THE WILDING OF LINDA FAIRSTEIN
*Read the whole article, I copied and paste the 2nd half. Ann is a good writer and she is correct with her facts when it comes to DNA usage
pretty sure if marcia and chris gave
a dna...bet it would have matched 999999%
