Trump sued by Central Park Five for defamation over claims made during Harris debate
- Thread starter bnew
- Start date
Inappropriate Behavior
Trump wrote a letter that had nothing to do with their actual court case.
It was a democrat prosecutor that actually sent them to prison. The same type of character deficit prosecutor like Kamala Harris that only care about conviction rates. Her office routinely prosecuted innocent black people like Jamal trulove.
At the same time trump wrote the infamous letter, democrats like Biden and Hilary Clinton were creating the same “super predator” narrative that trump was alluding to in his letter.
Y’all are not serious.
Decades later after the Central Park Five were acquitted Trump still said they deserved to die.
You stupid fukking a$$hole.
Back for the payback
Typically shill response, can’t defend their position so they response with sassy post
I defended it just fine.Typically shill response, can’t defend their position so they response with sassy post
Your response was to come at me with some whataboutism.
You stupid fukking a$$hole.
Dameon Farrow
Superstar
Cult-Speak 101 right here. Damn. Hit every cylinder.
You didn’t even address it you sassy shill
Thats the main reason I was suprised to see them at that Democratic national convention. I just assumed they got an appearance fee and let them cook
That period was the definition of a #BothSides collaboration. Reagen bought the drugs in and flooded our communities. After the violence black folks wanted something done and Joe Biden decided it would be a good idea to throw black youth in jail and throw away the key. Bush Senior signed it into law. And yes the rhetoric of that time from people like Hillary definitely stoked hatred and created the environment for kids to be seen as animals.
They will probably win if they get it in the right court. More likely on saying they killed somebody. Because im pretty sure he just means they confessed to being guilty,which they later recanted because the confession was coerced.
Be careful, when you point out the hypocrisy of blue maga they’ll respond with a sassy post like @Remote or beg mods to silence youThats the main reason I was suprised to see them at that Democratic national convention. I just assumed they got an appearance fee and let them cook
That period was the definition of a #BothSides collaboration. Reagen bought the drugs in and flooded our communities. After the violence black folks wanted something done and Joe Biden decided it would be a good idea to throw black youth in jail and throw away the key. Bush Senior signed it into law. And yes the rhetoric of that time from people like Hillary definitely stoked hatred and created the environment for kids to be seen as animals.
They will probably win if they get it in the right court. More likely on saying they killed somebody. Because im pretty sure he just means they confessed to being guilty,which they later recanted because the confession was coerced.
Opinion: I fact-checked assumptions about Kamala Harris’ past
Kamala Harris was the San Francisco District Attorney (DA) from 2004 to 2011 and the California Attorney General (AG) from 2011 to 2017. The DA is an elected position that determines which arrests in a district to prosecute. The AG is an elected official who advises the governor and state...
www.urbanlegendnews.org
A study done by the NAACP and the Drug Policy Alliance (DPA) found that when looking at the top 25 major cities in California from 2006 to 2008, Black people were incarcerated for marijuana offenses at four to twelve times the rate of white people. However, San Francisco had such low marijuana arrests the city was not even included in the study. This suggests that, when Harris was DA, marijuana convictions also likely were relatively low and that, accordingly, the claim that Harris “prosecuted minor drug offenses ruthlessly” is not accurate.
She also started a program for first time offenders where they could earn their GED, job training and benefits. Once they completed their program, their record was expunged.
It was highly successful, and only 10% of people who completed the program were convicted of a crime again.
She was truly at the forefront of a lot of major criminal justice reform that we want to see happen. She stopped the trans panic defense, required her officers to wear body cams, refused to seek the death penalty, created re-entry programs, aimed to stop truancy - realizing that truancy led to incarceration, ignored prop 8, required officers to take implicit bias tests.
And she did this at a time when it wasn’t popular to do so.
She has some errors of course, and she has political moments too - where she’s clearly appealing to the people she needs to appeal to in order to keep power.
But we can’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. And we also can’t have progress without failures and missteps - so punishing people who try is not the way to go.
She also started a program for first time offenders where they could earn their GED, job training and benefits. Once they completed their program, their record was expunged.
It was highly successful, and only 10% of people who completed the program were convicted of a crime again.
She was truly at the forefront of a lot of major criminal justice reform that we want to see happen. She stopped the trans panic defense, required her officers to wear body cams, refused to seek the death penalty, created re-entry programs, aimed to stop truancy - realizing that truancy led to incarceration, ignored prop 8, required officers to take implicit bias tests.
And she did this at a time when it wasn’t popular to do so.
She has some errors of course, and she has political moments too - where she’s clearly appealing to the people she needs to appeal to in order to keep power.
But we can’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. And we also can’t have progress without failures and missteps - so punishing people who try is not the way to go.
