If we're being honest our democracy cannot survive this level of misinformation constantly being peddled out. Hilary is right as she was about things in 2016. Many of us just didn't want to hear it.
If we're being honest our democracy cannot survive this level of misinformation constantly being peddled out. Hilary is right as she was about things in 2016. Many of us just didn't want to hear it.
nah, because the alternative is worse go live in china for a month, and report back to us. as bad as the misinformation has gotten on twitter....it has to be that way
and i'm definitely not turning over the legal definition of truth, to the same people who decided what "the science" was in 2020
I got called up by a Somali breh in Seattle who called me a tool cause I said I wanted Harris to win. He said so genocide isn’t a redline? I’m like you want me to want Trump to win so the Dems can be punished?
nah, because the alternative is worse go live in china for a month, and report back to us. as bad as the misinformation has gotten on twitter....it has to be that way
and i'm definitely not turning over the legal definition of truth, to the same people who decided what "the science" was in 2020
It doesn't have to be that way. It doesn't have to be Hillary's way, either. Social media companies need to do a hell of a better job of dealing with harmful shyt like child exploitation material, threats of violence, hate speech and disinformation, but getting rid of Section 230 will just make them over-moderate everything just to avoid lawsuits, and I think that will have a detrimental effect on speech, and lead to the loss of a lot of smaller platforms and communities like this one. Instead, we should push for clearer rules on what counts as harmful content, and push platforms to act responsibly, while investing in media literacy initiatives.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.