WHO WINS?


  • Total voters
    250

Frump

Superstar
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
15,506
Reputation
-2,403
Daps
44,729
Reppin
NULL
On a related note to my last post, I think a lot of the misguided perspectives on the odds of victory are because some of the shared content is based on who is popular as opposed to who is informed/credible. For example, I saw this tweet reposted by multiple people in this thread the other day:


Lots of engagement on the tweet but is it coming from a reputable source? Is the guy saying it informed on the topic? Does he have a background in politics? Polling? Running campaigns?

A quick search for him online & his Facebook:
nx4SolM.png
When we are listening to an IT Recruiter for political analysis, it makes sense why we have some misguided perspectives on the race:beli:


Also there are pollsters or former pollsters who disagree with how Silver does polling

You can take he’s polling over anyone else if you choose but there is no evidence that it would be wise to do so. He’s hit or miss like everyone else since 2016




 

Macallik86

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
6,409
Reputation
1,367
Daps
20,961
Or they aren’t trying to repeat 2016 and don’t want to get complacent in a close race. I’m not saying they are up by a ton. In todays day and age every election is gonna be somewhat close

Silver isn’t infallable if you want to believe him over others fine but there is no evidence that he is better at it then everyone else

The actions of Trump and his campaign lately aren’t that of someone who thinks they are up imo
Actually, his accuracy relative to other pollsters is how he rose to prominence:
Political predictions are “big this year because of Nate Silver,” said Sam Wang, who runs the rival site Princeton Election Consortium. “He loves discussing the details of the data, and his commentary is quite good. He’s made this hobby mainstream.”

Between his live TV appearances on election night, Mr. Silver updated his model and determined around 8 p.m., after New Hampshire went to Senator Obama, that Senator McCain had no way of winning. By the end of the night, Mr. Silver had predicted the popular vote within one percentage point, predicted 49 of 50 states’ results correctly, and predicted all of the resolved Senate races correctly.
I think his track record is better than anyone else (publicly) out there, which is why he was recognized by Time Magazine of one of the most influential people in the world:

When Dems were winning everything during the Obama-era and his polls reflected that, Republicans hated him. That's what makes the Dems hating on his polls now so sad because we would rather believe he has an ulterior motive (like Republicans) instead of accept that the race is tight and we might risk losing:
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
176,390
Reputation
22,249
Daps
579,013
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
Thanks!

You're still a bad-faith sh!tty poster tho :umad:

There's a difference between me telling fellow Democrats to avoid cognitive dissonance and embrace the race (and data) as it is, versus you calling people cacs, saying they post too much in TLR so their opinion doesn't count, both-siderism bullsh!t, etc

He gets upset when people explain to him how he's wrong so he starts with throwing around random insults, lying, whatever... Lol

Also, everyone in here can clearly see that I post a lot more info than what's supposedly on "cable news..."

It's not my fault posters like him want to skip past or look over data that I present in here to get off their daily narratives... :manny:
 

Frump

Superstar
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
15,506
Reputation
-2,403
Daps
44,729
Reppin
NULL
Actually, his accuracy relative to other pollsters is how he rose to prominence:

That's also why he was recognized by Time Magazine of one of the most influential people in the world for his polling:

When Dems were winning everything during the Obama-era and his polls reflected that, Republicans hated him. That's what makes the Dems hating on his polls now so sad because we sound like Republicans:

He’s also been wrong before and some people don’t think he’s done a good job of updating the formula

Here’s what I know it’s a close race somewhere near 50/50 regardless. Nobody should think it’s gonna be a blowout

If you want believe Nate and nobody else you have every right to but either way this is a close race that will come down to a few thousand votes in PA
 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
4,616
Reputation
141
Daps
13,911
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
He’s also been wrong before and some people don’t think he’s done a good job of updating the formula

Here’s what I know it’s a close race somewhere near 50/50 regardless. Nobody should think it’s gonna be a blowout

If you want believe Nate and nobody else you have every right to but either way this is a close race that will come down to a few thousand votes in PA
If Trump debates then I think we’re going to be headed towards blowout territory. America ignored his lunacy against Biden because Biden’s performance shocked everyone. This time his insanity will be on full display and America won’t like it. It’ll also be one of the most televised debates ever
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
176,390
Reputation
22,249
Daps
579,013
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
@Macallik86 My issue with Nate Silver (and don't get me wrong, I'm still checking for his data/models) is that he doesn't really admit when he is wrong and he's carrying on petty beefs with former colleagues that make him look like like he has an ax to grind..

All I want is data from these pollsters. That's it.
 

Macallik86

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Dec 4, 2016
Messages
6,409
Reputation
1,367
Daps
20,961
@Macallik86 My issue with Nate Silver (and don't get me wrong, I'm still checking for his data/models) is that he doesn't really admit when he is wrong and he's carrying on petty beefs with former colleagues that make him look like like he has an ax to grind..

All I want is data from these pollsters. That's it.
No disagreement from me.

A few weeks back, I listened to his episode on Ezra Klein's podcast, and when came to discussions around policy/society/cancel culture/etc, I wouldn't go as far as saying Ezra sonned him, but Ezra was clearly intellectually superior and picked apart Nate Silver in a few areas.

It makes sense because Ezra Klein is a former editor and journalist (who covered governmental policy) and makes well-thought-out arguments for a living... He was operating in his area of expertise and Silver was floundering.

In the same vein tho, putting Nate's quirks/pettiness or hot-takes aside, if we are limiting strictly to his polls, it's the one thing he's good at the best in the world at, and so it makes sense to try and listen to the message objectively.
 
Last edited:

John Reena

Superstar
Joined
Jan 27, 2016
Messages
15,028
Reputation
-965
Daps
44,089
But we should shyt on people when they vote democrat, especially when the alternative is trump

Smooth mind logic at its best here ladies and gentleman.

This guy shyts on people all day then begs not to get shyt on when the “moral” candidate he is voting for gets outted for being a grifter :mjlol:

Imagine voting for Cornel West, a guy being propped up by republicans to help Trump.
 
Top