I’d give him $22-24M a season, 3-4 years. Ideally as that deal goes on he slides in the pecking order of the team. Like I said he’s a fourth option ideally on a championship team.What a good price in your opinion?
It's clear that Julius Randle can't be option #1, he's an option #2 type player. A team's offense can't be centered around Julius Randle period.
The Knicks need an elite point guard. We haven't had one since Walt Frazier. The Knicks also need a solid knock-down 3 point shooter like Bogdanović.
Mitch would have made a big difference man.![]()
he makes a big enough difference in a 1 point game in game 1If Mitch plays we’re still down 3-1![]()
Mitch would have made a big difference man.![]()
If Mitch plays it’s 2-2 (Trae does not get that shot off in game one)If Mitch plays we’re still down 3-1![]()
That’s not how it works no telling how he even performs for all we know dude could have been in foul trouble. He’s not enough of a difference maker to swing this series.he makes a big enough difference in a 1 point game in game 1![]()
He's not even a #2 option Randle is a #3 or #4 option at best on a championship team
Knicks shouldn’t extend him. I would say there was no chance but he is a CAA client. The two sides shouldn’t be able to meet on an agreement. Knicks should offer 20-22 and CAA should counter with 24-26.I’d give him $22-24M a season, 3-4 years. Ideally as that deal goes on he slides in the pecking order of the team. Like I said he’s a fourth option ideally on a championship team.